Spelling suggestions: "subject:"soft drinks."" "subject:"oft drinks.""
41 |
Investigating the association between sugar-sweetened beverages intake and risk of metabolic syndrome among Ellisras rural youth : Ellisras longitudinal studySeloka, Mohlago Ablonia January 2022 (has links)
Thesis (M. A. (Physiology)) -- University of Limpopo, 2022 / Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is amongst the underlying causes of mortality and morbidity globally. However, lifestyle habits such as frequent consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) contributes to its onset. The study was aimed at investigating the association between MetS and SSBs intake among Ellisras rural youth. Additionally, to find the best obesity indices to predict MetS.
Methods: The current study included a total of 593 Ellisras rural youth, aged 22 to 30 years (289 males and 304 females). Anthropometric measurements, blood pressure (BP), and biochemical assessment were taken using standards procedures. A validated 24hrs recall questionnaire and food manuals were used to collect SSBs data. Binary logistic regression was applied to determine the association between SSBs intake and MetS components for the adjusted model. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the best single-factor models to predict MetS on commonly selected obesity indices.
Results: The SSBs quartile 4 was associated with a high risk of high fasting blood glucose (FBG) for adjusted (OR=2.32; CI=1.15-4.70; p<0.05) and unadjusted (OR=2.34; CI=1.16-4.73; p<0.05) models were a significant linear trend (p for trend=0.049) in males was found. Low risk of reduced high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was associated with the second and fourth SSBs quartiles for unadjusted ((OR=0.40; CI=0.18-0.85; p<0.05; OR=0.37; CI=0.13-0.80; p<0.05) respectively and adjusted model (OR=0.40; CI=0.18-0.85; p<0.05; OR=0.37; CI=0.17-0.80; p<0.05) respectively in females. Moreover, the fourth SSBs quartile was likely to decrease the risk of high triglycerides (TG) for unadjusted (OR=0.12; CI=0.01-0.87; p<0.05) and adjusted (OR=0.10; CI=0.01-0.83; p<0.05) models were the significant linear trend (p= trend 0.006) was observed also in females. There was a significant linear trend association between SSBs quartiles consumption and high TG in males and high waist circumference (WC) in females, but logistic regression analysis didn’t depict any significant association (p>0.05). In males, single model fit built based on WC (comparative fit index (CFI)=1.00; turker lewis index (TLI)=1.05; RMSEA=0.00; akaike information criterion (AIC)=-2680) and waist to height ratio
v
(WHtR) (RMSEA=0.00, CFI=1.00; AIC=-2662, TLI=1.05;) suggested a better fit index as compared to body mass index (BMI) and neck circumference (NC). Among females, a single model fit built on NC obtained a better fit index (RMSEA=0.05, CFI=0.90, and AIC= -429.21, TLI=0.71).
Conclusion: In this study, there was an association between SSBs consumption and some MetS components (high TG, reduced HDL-C, and high FBG). Obesity indices including WHtR, NC, and WC were the best predictors of MetS. Future studies are recommended to further investigate the association of the risk of MetS and the consumption SSBs and the best obesity indices to predict MetS to assist in efforts to help curb MetS and related risk factors in rural areas of South Africa.
|
42 |
Efecto de dos bebidas refrescantes en la adhesión de brackets. Observación mediante microcopio electrónico de barrido del esmalte intacto y sellado por una resina tras la exposición a dichas bebidasNavarro Garre, Rául 24 February 2012 (has links)
OBJETIVO: Evaluar el efecto de Coca-Cola® y Schweppes® Limón en la fuerza adhesiva, el adhesivo remanente y la microfiltración debajo de los brackets. Examinar mediante microscopio electrónico de barrido (MEB) el efecto de estas bebidas en el esmalte intacto y esmalte sellado.
MÉTODO: Se cementaron 120 brackets en incisivos bovinos y se dividieron 1) grupo control, 2) Coca-Cola®, 3) Schweppes® Limón. Los dientes fueron sumergidos en las bebidas tres veces al día (15 minutos) durante 15 días. La fuerza de adhesión fue medida con una máquina universal de ensayos y el adhesivo remanente, utilizando un equipo de análisis de imagen. La microfiltración en la interfase esmalte-adhesivo y adhesivo-bracket se determinó utilizando azul de metileno. Para las observaciones al MEB se utilizaron 108 dientes.
RESULTADOS: No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la fuerza adhesiva y el adhesivo remanente entre grupos. La microfiltración en la interfase esmalte-adhesivo para Coca-Cola® y Schweppes® Limón fue significativamente mayor que para el grupo control. En la interfase adhesivo-bracket la microfiltración de Coca-Cola® fue mayor que el grupo control, mientras que la microfiltración de Schweppes® Limón no difirió significativamente ni de Coca-Cola® ni del grupo control. Las bebidas produjeron erosión del esmalte y pérdida del material adhesivo. / Objective: To evaluate the effect of Coca-Cola® and Schweppes®-Limón on bond strength, adhesive remnant and microleakage beneath brackets. To examine by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) the effect of these drinks on intact and sealed enamel.
Methods: 120 brackets were bonded to bovine incisors and divided into: 1)Control-group; 2)Coca-Cola®; 3)Schweppes®-Limón. The teeth were submerged in the drinks 3 times/day (15 minutes) during fifteen days. Shear bond strength was measured with a universal test machine, and adhesive remnant using image analysis equipment. Microleakage at the enamel-adhesive and adhesive-bracket interfaces was detected using methylene blue. 108 teeth were used to examine by SEM the effect of the drinks on intact and sealed enamel.
Results: No significant differences were found in bond strength and adhesive remnant between groups. Microleakage at the enamel-adhesive interface for Coca-Cola® and Schweppes®-Limón was significantly greater than for the control. At the adhesive-bracket interface microleakage was significantly greater with Coca-Cola® than with the control whilst microleakage with Schweppes®-Limón did not differ significantly from either Coca-Cola® or the control. The drinks produced enamel erosion and loss of adhesive.
|
Page generated in 0.0434 seconds