Spelling suggestions: "subject:"epeech anda dearing cience"" "subject:"epeech anda dearing cscience""
121 |
Evidence-based Practice and Speech Sound Disorders: The why? And the How? Part I and IIWilliams, A. Lynn 01 January 2004 (has links)
No description available.
|
122 |
Feature Retention and Phonological Knowledge across DAS, PI, and Typical speechFord, T., Rowland, A., Williams, A. Lynn 01 January 2002 (has links)
No description available.
|
123 |
Phonological Intervention with Children: Word vs. Conversation LevelAgee, C., Bowden, C., Williams, A. Lynn 01 January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
124 |
Profiles of Early and Later Vocalizations in Children with Cleft Lip and/or Palate and Children without CleftsScherer, Nancy J., Williams, A. Lynn, Kalbfleisch, John 01 January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
125 |
Audiology Makes Rapid Advances in PolandSliwa, Lech, Kochanek, Krzysztof, Durrant, John D., Smurzynski, Jacek 01 February 2008 (has links)
Excerpt: Over the past 15 years, dramatic developments have occurred in the field of audiology in Poland. Three major factors have influenced the ongoing changes: development of new programs for treatment and prevention of hearing loss, a substantial improvement of qualifications of audiologists and related specialists, and the rapidly growing availability of advanced technology and treatment methods. These developments are now being accelerated by a dramatic growth in research and development in hearing science and clinical audiology in Poland.
|
126 |
Education in AudiologyDurrant, J., Collet, L., Fagelson, Marc A., Hatzapoulous, S., McPhereson, Daniel, Musiek, F., Skarzynski, H., Tavartkiladze, G. 19 May 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
127 |
Statistically Derived Factors of Varied Importance to Audiologists When Making a Hearing Aid Brand Preference DecisionJohnson, Earl E., Mueller, Gustav, Ricketts, Todd 01 January 2009 (has links)
To determine the amount of importance audiologists place on various items related to their selection of a preferred hearing aid brand manufacturer. Three hundred forty-three hearing aid-dispensing audiologists rated a total of 32 randomized items by survey methodology. Principle component analysis identified seven orthogonal statistical factors of importance. In rank order, these factors were Aptitude of the Brand, Image, Cost, Sales and Speed of Delivery, Exposure, Colleague Recommendations, and Contracts and Incentives. While it was hypothesized that differences among audiologists in the importance ratings of these factors would dictate their preference for a given brand, that was not our finding. Specifically, mean ratings for the six most important factors did not differ among audiologists preferring different brands. A statistically significant difference among audiologists preferring different brands was present, however, for one factor: Contracts and Incentives. Its assigned importance, though, was always lower than that for the other six factors. Although most audiologists have a preferred hearing aid brand, differences in the perceived importance of common factors attributed to brands do not largely determine preference for a particular brand.
|
128 |
The Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Listeners with Hearing ImpairmentJohnson, Earl E., Bell, Dan 01 April 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
129 |
Better Hearing Devices and Many Forms of DeliveryJohnson, Earl E. 01 April 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
130 |
A Statistics PrimerJohnson, Earl E. 01 March 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.0809 seconds