• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • No language data
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

Robust low bit rate analysis-by-synthesis predictive speech coding

Salami, Redwan Ali January 1990 (has links)
No description available.
2

Digital encoding of speech signals at 16-4.8 KBPS

Kondoz, Ahmet M. January 1988 (has links)
Speech coding at 64 and 32 Kb/s is well developed and standardized. The next bit rate of interest is at 16 Kb/s. Although. standardization has yet to be made, speech coding at 16 Kb/s is fairly well developed. The existing coders can produce good quality speech at rates as low as about 9.6 Kb/s. At present the major research area is at 8 to 4.8 Kb/s. This work deals first of all with enhancing the quality andkcomplexity of some of the most promising coders at 16 to 9.6 Kb/s as well as proposing new alternative coders. For this purpose coders operating at 16 Kb/s and 12 to 9.6 Kb/s have been grouped together and optimized for their corresponding bit rates. The second part of the work deals with the possibilities of coding the speech signals at lower rates than 9.6 Kb/s. Therefore, coders which produce good quality speech at bit rates 8 to 4.8 Kb/s have been designed and simulated. As well as designing coders to operate at rates below 32 Kb/s. it is very important to test them. Coders operating at 32 Kb/s and above contain only quantization noise and usually have large signal to noise ratios (SNR). For this reason their SNR's may be used for comparison of the coders. However, for the coders operating at 16 Kb/s and below this is not so and hence subjective testing is necessary for true comparison of the coders. The final part of this work deals with the subjective testing of 6 coders, three at 16 Kb/s and the other three at 9.6 Kb/s.

Page generated in 0.0594 seconds