The purpose of this dissertation was to study the property tax and property tax exemptions in the United States and in Indiana. The main body of this dissertation, however, deals with the State of Indiana. The method of the study is primarily legalistic: the Constitution of Indiana, the laws of Indiana, and relevant decisions of the Indiana courts provide the major portion of the research material. These constitutional and statutory provisions were considered as to the manner in which they were interpreted by the judicial authorities of the State of Indiana.Taxes and taxation are areas of great concern in the United States today. As this concern has increased, more and more attention has been paid to the property tax. This tax provides much of the revenue of county and municipal governments in the United States and plays a very important part in our national revenue system.This tax has been severely castigated by numerous critics who have studied it over the years, with some of the strongest criticisms aimed at exemptions, which have been made from the taxes. Every state in the Union has provided for at least some categories of exemption, with most allowing fairly large amounts of property to be exempted. These categories of exemptions include the property of: the federal government, states, local governments, churches, charitable organizations, veterans, and others.Very much the same thing has been done in Indiana. The State Constitution gives the legislature the power to grant exemptions from the property tax through law. This has been done in all the categories listed above, as well as some others.The scope of a statute can be expanded or contracted trememdously by judicial interpretation. Judges can make new law through their decisions or greatly change the scope of laws already written.Indiana courts have interpreted the tax exemption statutes numerous times over the years. In the cases brought before them the courts have made certain rules to guide those who are applying for exemption. These rules have also let the taxing authorities know the meaning and scope of the tax exemption statutes.The courts in construing these statutes have read them in a strict manner and have not, as a rule, expanded their meaning through interpretation.The courts have held that all exemptions are a departure from the principle that all real estate should be taxed and construed them in a narrow manner. The courts have also considered them in the light of whether or not there is a public benefit involved.In looking at the numerous exemptions that have been granted by state law, the courts determine if this has been done under a constitutional grant of power. If there is a constitutional basis for the statute, the courts than look at other aspects of the law.The courts in Indiana have not contributed to the increase in the amount of tax exempt property in the state. This has been done by the State Legislature. The courts have construed the statutes in the way that they felt was intended by the legislature. If the amount of tax exempt property is to be decreased, it will have to be done by the legislative body of the state and not the courts.

Issued also as thesis, Columbia University. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1998. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [100]-104).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Columbia University, 1929. / Vita. Published also as Teachers college, Columbia university, Contributions to education, no. 349. Bibliography: p. 123-124.

Akademisk avhandling--Uppsala. / Summary in German. Scandinavian university books. Includes bibliographical references.

The tax exemptions granted to financial institutions like Subchapter S banks and credit unions cost billions of dollars to the government. The dissertation investigates the effect of tax exemption on competitiveness, performance and portfolio risk of credit unions and Subchapter S banks. The methodologies include difference in differences estimation, univariate and multivariate analysis. The first essay entitled “The tax exemption to Subchapter S banks: who gets the benefit?” investigates the effect of tax exemption to Subchapter S banks on stakeholders and on job creation. Specifically, we investigate the effect of adoption of Subchapter S status on the four stakeholders of the banks: the customers of the bank, the employees of the bank, the owners of the bank and the government. The results indicate that the tax exemptions to Subchapter S banks do not create new jobs, and that the owners of the bank are the sole beneficiary of the tax exemptions since there is a significant increase in bank’s return on equity after it adopts the Subchapter S status. The second essay entitled “A comparison of credit unions and Subchapter S banks: who shares higher tax benefits with customers?” examines whether credit unions are doing a better job of sharing the tax benefit with its customers. The results indicate that the credit union members do not receive the benefit in terms of lower loan rates, higher deposit rates or lower service charges. The findings also indicate that tax exemptions have been directed to support inefficient operations. The third essay entitled “Asset quality comparison between credit unions and Subchapter S banks” compares the asset quality of for-profit Subchapter S banks with not-for-profit credit unions. The results indicate that credit unions have better asset quality, but Subchapter S banks are superior in utilizing assets and generating higher net interest margin.

Forms in pocket. / Digitized by Kansas State University Libraries

The primary objective of this dissertation was to identify and estimate the relative importance of factors used by the Tax Court in deciding hobby loss cases. This was accomplished in two steps. The first step was to review the Treasury Regulations, cases and literature pertaining to hobby losses to determine the relevant factors used by the Court in deciding this issue. The second step involved using probit analysis to identify which of these factors actually influenced the Court in deciding hobby loss cases and to determine the relative importance of the factors. A secondary purpose was to to explore the probit model's ability to predict decisions likely to be appealed. The probit model was based on the analysis of 219 post-1954 Tax Court cases involving determination of whether activities were or were not engaged in for profit. By application of log-likelihood techniques, it was determined that the model developed was stable over time and across lines of "business," the implication being that cases decided both before and after the passage of Section 183 and involving all types of activity should have precedential value in conflicts between taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service. Five factors were found to be significant predictors: manner of operation, level of expertise, time expended, history of income and loss, and presence of elements of personal pleasure. It is important to note that the two factors not susceptible to tax planning--success in other activities and financial status of the taxpayer--were insignificant discriminators between business and hobby outcomes. The implication is that with careful tax planning, one can organize and operate a given activity so that it is likely to receive favorable tax treatment. The probit model proved to be unable to predict decisions likely to be appealed. The probability that a particular case would be classified by the Court as a business did not appear to be a significant predictor of whether a taxpayer would appeal an adverse decision.

A research report submitted to the Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Commerce / The debt reduction provisions contained in s 19 and para 12A of the Eighth Schedule to the Income Tax Act 58 of 1962 seek to reverse the tax benefits claimed or enjoyed by debtors in relation to debt which has been forgiven, wholly or in part. In most cases, the application of these provisions should not lead to any difficulty. Nevertheless, some scenarios are not adequately provided for by the legislation, including debt reduction in favour of debtors carrying on mining operations, as well as partial debt reductions. Furthermore, the applicability of some of the exemptions to these provisions is unclear. Despite recent amendments to these provisions, which will apply to years of assessment commencing on or after 1 January 2013, the legislature has not addressed these issues. Key words: allowance assets; base cost; capital assets; capital gains tax; debt forgiveness; debt reduction; debt waiver; deemed donation; donation; donations tax; exemption; group of companies; operating expenditure; mining capital expenditure; tracing of expenditure; trading stock.

Religious institutions have been tax-exempt from almost all taxes for more than two centuries. The two primary justifications used to protect this ‘status’ is the constitution and the concept that churches provide positive externalities that believers and non-believers all benefit from. This paper examines the relationship between religiosity and five socially important characteristics: high school graduation rate, a divorce rate, incidence of domestic violence, and levels of substance abuse and crime. I run multiple simple and full regressions across 207 counties in Texas. In four of the five analyses, religiosity has a strong statistically significant desirable impact. With the addition of control variables, other explanatory variables like median household income and number of divorces have coefficients with greater magnitude but the same statistical significance as that of religiosity.