Not available / text

Not available / text

Pavement performance prediction in terms of fatigue cracking and surface rutting are essential for any mechanistically-based pavement design method. Traditionally, the estimation of the expected fatigue field performance has been based on the laboratory bending beam test. Full-scale Accelerated Pavement Testing (APT) is an alternative to laboratory testing leading to advances in practice and economic savings for the evaluation of new pavement configurations, stress level related factors, new materials and design improvements. This type of testing closely simulates field conditions; however, it does not capture actual performance because of the limited ability to address long-term phenomena. The same pavement structure may exhibit different response and performance under APT than when in-service. Actual field performance is better captured by experiments such as Federal Highway Administration's Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) studies. Therefore, to fully utilize the benefits of APT, there is a need for a methodology to predict the long-term performance of in-service pavement structures from the results of APT tests that will account for such differences. Three models are generally suggested to account for the difference: shift factors, statistical and mechanistic approaches. A reliability based methodology for fatigue cracking prediction is proposed in this research, through which the three models suggested previously are combined into one general approach that builds on their individual strengths to overcome some of the shortcomings when the models are applied individually. The Bias Correction Factor (BCF) should account for all quantifiable differences between the fatigue life of the pavement site under APT and in-service conditions. In addition to the Bias Correction Factor, a marginal shift factor, M, should be included to account for the unquantifiable differences when predicting the in-service pavement fatigue life from APT. The Bias Correction Factor represents an improvement of the currently used "shift factors" since they are more general and based on laboratory testing or computer simulation. By applying the proposed methodology, APT performance results from a structure similar to an in-service structure can be used to perform four-point bending beam tests and structural analysis to obtain an accurate estimate of the necessary Bias Correction Factor to estimate in-service performance.

No description available.

M. Tech. Civil Engineering. / The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of an increase in stone size and volume on asphalt. This will be limited to asphalt surfacing with a viewpoint to the coal haulage industry.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

This study reports the development of the Grievance Expression Scale (GES), a self-report measurement instrument of how organizational members express objections or complaints that they have about one another's behavior. The GES focuses on grievance expression as a precursor to conflict, and was developed in response to a lack of focus in current conflict instruments on conflict communication behavior and the influence of situational variables on that behavior. Additionally, the scale was derived from an interdisciplinary theoretical base, incorporating organizational conflict management research in communication, management, anthropology, and sociology. Four forms of the GES were administered to 830 currently employed adults waiting for jury duty and attending a city street fair. A four-factor scale was found, consisting of third party, confrontation, toleration, and discipline factors. Reliability, content, discriminant, and construct validity of the GES were supported. Further development should include tests of theory utilizing the GES.