Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-05T18:11:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 12 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Nesta dissertação de mestrado, procuro mostrar a contribuição de determinadas concepções de organização textual para a representação do texto realizada pelo modelo da Rhetorical Structure Theory – RST (Mann; Thompson, 1988). A RST é uma teoria que explica a estrutura textual por meio de um modelo de relações que se estabelecem, recursivamente, entre partes do texto consideradas pelo analista como núcleos e satélites. Porém, apesar de abarcar a coerência retórica relacional, a RST, como teoria, não lida com outras concepções que dêem conta do processo complexo de organização textual. Dessa forma, como modelo, ela representa o texto de forma limitada. Neste trabalho, investigo a possibilidade de a RST ser associada a determinadas concepções de organização textual, como a relação entre texto e contexto e o processo estratégico top-down de formação do texto. Para tanto, realizo uma investigação em duas partes: uma teórica e uma de análise. Na parte teórica, apresento um quadro teórico que embasa as concepções de / In this master’s degree paper work, I aim to show the contribution of some conceptions of textual organization to the text representing process carried out by Rhetorical Structure Theory – RST (Mann; Thompson, 1988). RST is a theory that explains the text structure by postulating a model of relations which recursively hold between parts of text labeled nucleus or satellite by the analyst. However, even accounting for the rhetorical relational coherence, RST, as a theory, doesn’t include other conceptions to account for the complex process of textual organization. Thus, as a model, it produces a limited text representation. In this paper work, I investigate the possibility of associating RST with some conceptions of textual organization, like the relationship between text and context and the top-down strategic process of text construction. To do so, I carry out an investigation in two parts: a theoretical one and an analytical one. In the theoretical part, I show a theoretical framework that supports the conce

Cette thèse aborde un phénomène du changement linguistique spécifique à la langue française en tant que langue romane : la généralisation de l’emploi des personnels sujets considérée comme acquise au 17e siècle. Les relevés opérés dans un corpus littéraire en prose réparti sur le 16e s. montrent que cette progression, bien qu’elle soit continue, est inégale selon que les personnels sujets réfèrent au locuteur ou à l’allocutaire de la situation contextuelle ou qu’ils réfèrent à un élément cotextuel. Aussi, pour expliciter cette disparité, cette étude s’appuie sur l’hétérogénéité interne au paradigme des personnels sujets et distingue les personnels déictiques locutifs je/nous, et allocutifs tu/vous, et les anaphoriques il(s)/elle(s), et propose la raison énonciative comme principal facteur d’emploi. Elle s’efforce de démontrer que leur emploi correspond à un choix émanant de l’énonciateur qui s’effectue dans des cadres cotextuels repérables, illustrés par deux corpus, les assertions fictionnelles postérieures à un discours direct fictif (chap. 3) et un ensemble de propositions subordonnées (chap. 4). Dans le premier, le recours aux personnels sujets quel que soit leur mode référentiel pallie une saturation textuelle traditionnelle en voie de disparition. Dans le second, l’énonciateur (fictif ou fictionnel) signifie son intention de prendre en charge la représentation des instances de la situation coénonciative (je ou vous) au lieu de la laisser à l’initiative de son allocutaire. Au terme de cette thèse, le passage d’une morphosyntaxe variée à la progressive fixation de l’ordre phrastique PSV se trouve justifiée par trois critères, énonciatif, pragmatique et textuel. / This thesis addresses a phenomenon of language change specific to the French language as a Romance language: the generalisation of the use of subjective personals considered asestablished on the end of the 16th century. The listings extracted from a literary corpus inprose show that, even though it has a significantly evolution, the progression depends on whether the subjective personals refer to the locutor or to the allocutor in the context or if theyrefer to the co-text. To explain that the discrepancy, this study is based upon the internal heterogeneity of the paradigm in subjective personals, making the difference between the first person deictic personals je/nous, the second person ones tu/vous and the anaphoric subjectivepersonals il(s)/elle(s), and it gives an enunciative reason as the main factor of use. To us, their use corresponds to a choice by the enunciator, choice made within a defined co-text, illustrated by two corpus: fictional assertions posterior to a fictitious direct speech (chap. 3) and a set of dependent clauses (chap.4). In the first one, resorting to subjective personals regardless of their referential mood compensates for a traditional textual saturation which ison its ellapsing way. In the second one, the (fictitious or fictional) enunciator signifies his intention to be responsible for the representation of the co-enunciative situation’s occurrences instead of leaving it to his allocutor’s initiative. At the end of this thesis, the transition from a mutable morphosyntax to the progressive fixation of the SP V sentential order will be justifiedby three different criteria, enunciative, pragmatic and textual.