Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Franchise besighede is ʼn alledaagse verskynsel in die Suid-Afrikaanse en Internasionale besigheidswêreld. Ingevolge afdeling 12(2)(c) van Regulasie 287 van die Petroleum Produkte Wet No. 120 van 1977 word ʼn groothandelaar van petroleum produkte verbied om ʼn kleinhandellisensie te besit anders as vir doeleindes van opleiding. Die gevolg hiervan is dat petroleum maatskappye gebruik maak van franchisehouers om hulle vulstasies en geriefswinkels namens hulle te bedryf aangesien die franchisehouers toegelaat word om kleinhandellisensies te besit vir besigheidsdoeleindes. Die konsep van ʼn franchise is daarop gebaseer dat ʼn franchisehouer die franchise van ʼn bestaande, en dikwels welvarende, besigheid bekom vanaf ʼn franchisegewer en dan die besigheid onder die vaandel van daardie franchise bedryf. Die franchisehouer betaal dikwels ʼn eenmalige enkelbedrag franchisefooi aan die franchisegewer en addisioneel daartoe ʼn deurlopende franchisefooi, gewoonlik op ʼn maandelikse basis. Die deurlopende franchisefooi word normaalweg bereken as ʼn persentasie van omset van die franchise besigheid, of dit word bereken volgens ʼn alternatiewe formule of metode soos uiteengesit in die betrokke franchise-ooreenkoms. Wanneer franchisehouers hul inkomstebelasting vir ʼn spesifieke jaar van aanslag bereken, word hulle gekonfronteer met die vraag oor hoe om die franchisefooie vir inkomstebelastingdoeleindes te hanteer. Die inkomstebelasting hantering van die eenmalige enkelbedrag franchisefooi blyk meer onduidelik te wees as dié van die deurlopende fooi. Die bewoording wat in die franchise-ooreenkoms gebruik word om hierdie eenmalige enkelbedrag te omskryf is dikwels vaag en verg verdere interpretasie wat uit die aard van die saak die korrekte inkomstebelasting hantering daarvan bemoeilik. Hierdie studie stel gevolglik ondersoek in na die inkomstebelastinghantering van franchisefooie betaalbaar deur die franchisehouers in die Suid-Afrikaanse petroleumbedryf ingevolge die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomstebelastingwet No. 58 van 1962. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Franchise businesses are an everyday occurrence in the South African and International business world. A wholesaler of petroleum products is prohibited in terms of section 12(2)(c) of Regulation 287 of the Petroleum Products Act No. 120 of 1977 to own a retail license for purposes other than that of training. As a result, petroleum companies make use of franchises where the franchisee is allowed to own a retail license and is therefore able to operate a service station and convenience store on the companies’ behalf. The concept of a franchise is based on the principle that a franchisee obtains the franchise of an existing, often prosperous, business from a franchisor, and then operates the business under the banner of this franchise. The franchisee usually pays a once-off lump sum fee and in addition to this fee a continuous franchise fee, usually on a monthly basis. The continuous franchise fee is usually calculated as a percentage of the turnover of the franchise business, or it is calculated using an alternative formula or method as set out in the franchise agreement. Franchisees are confronted with the question on how to treat the payment of the franchise fees for income tax purposes when they calculate their income tax liability for a specific year of assessment. The income tax treatment of the once-off lump sum franchise fee seems to be less clear than that of the continuous franchise fee. The wording used in franchise agreements to define and describe the once-off fee is often vague and requires further interpretation. This encumbers the correct income tax treatment of the fee. This study therefore investigates the income tax treatment of franchise fees payable by franchisees in the South African petroleum industry in terms of the South African Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962.

Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2009. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Due to the integration of IT into all aspects of modern-day businesses, it is vital that the risks associated with IT are governed as an integral element of enterprise-wide corporate governance. The Third King Report on Corporate Governance (King III) was issued by the South African Chapter of the Institute of Directors in September 2009 and becomes operational on 1 March 2010. This marks the first time that the King Report has specifically addressed IT governance. King III will apply to all corporate entities. Such entities could benefit from applying an IT governance framework to ensure that they adequately address all aspects of IT governance, as required by King III. One of the comprehensive frameworks available is COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology) issued by ISACA (previously known as the Information Systems Audit and Control Association). King III mentions the fact that COBIT could be used to assess and implement IT governance within an entity. The aim of this research is to determine whether the use of COBIT ensures compliance with King III’s requirements relating to IT governance. It was found that the main requirements in King III relating to IT governance and the processes of COBIT are well aligned, and, as a result, COBIT could be used effectively to ensure compliance with King III in relation to IT governance. However, an entity would still have to pay attention to certain King III-specific requirements. Furthermore, it was found that the application of the principles in COBIT could further strengthen the IT governance of an entity, as COBIT also addresses the more detailed activities, such as the implementation and operation of the IT system, which is not specifically addressed by King III.

Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2009. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Op 9 Februarie 2007 het President Thabo Mbeki in sy “State of the Nation Address” aangekondig dat voorstelle vir ‘n bydraende verdienste-gebaseerde nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds as deel van die 2007- begroting voorgelê sal word. Die raamwerk vir so ‘n nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds is uiteengesit in ‘n dokument wat gepubliseer is in ‘n geskrif wat deur die Nasionale Tesourie beskikbaar gestel is vir openbare terugvoer. Hierdie stelsel beoog om deur middel van ‘n verpligte belasting wat maandeliks van lede se salarisse afgetrek sal word, ‘n fonds daar te stel wat ten doel het om ‘n sekere vlak van inkomste ná ‘n lid se aftrede te verseker. Die aangeleentheid het onlangs dekking in die pers ontvang onder die opskifte “Lede wat nie vroeg genoeg doodgaan nie, kan pensioenfondse knou”, “Aftreefonds-paniek” en "Nasionale fonds straks deur private sektor bestuur, staat gaan nie almal se geld vat”. Uit hierdie artikels kan afgelei word dat die Suid-Afrikaanse publiek bekommerd is oor die vooruitsig dat die regering aangedui het dat hulle voortaan aftreefondse sal bestuur onder die nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds. Dit is ‘n welbekende feit dat soortgelyke stelsels in baie ekonomieë wêreldwyd teenwoordig is, en tans onder geweldige finansieringsdruk gebuk gaan. Hierdie navorsing is onderneem om die Suid-Afrikaanse publiek in staat te stel om ‘n ingeligte besluit te neem oor die risiko van ‘n finansieringskrisis by die voorgestelde Suid- Afrikaanse nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds deur die volgende te doen: · Identifisering van die oorsake van finansieringsprobleme by maatskaplike aftreefondse wêreldwyd. · ‘n Vergelyking te tref tussen die voorgestelde Suid-Afrikaanse nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds en beter praktyke vir maatskaplike aftreefondse. · ‘n Oorweging of die bogenoemde oorsake van finansieringsprobleme by maatskaplike aftreefondse wêreldwyd, van toepassing is op die Suid-Afrikaanse situasie. iii Die navorsing het op die volgende gedui: · Die hoofoorsake van finansieringskrisisse by nasionale maatskaplike aftreefondse wêreldwyd is: die teenwoordigheid van finalebydraeskemas, afname in die aftreeouderdom van die bevolking, die teenwoordigheid van langer lewensverwagtings en die afname in bevolkingsgroei. · Die voorgestelde Suid-Afrikaanse nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds is byna identies aan die stelsel van beste praktyke soos voorgelê deur die Wêreldbank. Die feit dat die struktuur van die stelsel gebaseer is op soortgelyke stelsels wat reeds suksesvol geïmplementeer is in die res van die wêreld, behoort die Suid Afrikaanse publiek positief te beïnvloed. · Die Suid-Afrikaanse nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds sal nie gebaseer wees op ’n finalebydraeskema nie en sal gevolglik nie blootgestel wees aan die risiko nie. Die fonds sal egter, soortgelyk aan die internasionale situasie, blootgestel wees aan ‘n afname in aftree-ouderdom, afname in geboortes en ‘n toename in lewensverwagting. Gebaseer op die bogenoemde bevindinge is dit duidelik dat die Suid-Afrikaanse voorstel vir ’n nasionale maatskaplike aftreefonds, wel blootgestel sal wees aan finansieringsrisiko’s. Die skrywer glo egter dat deur die Suid-Afrikaanse voorstel te baseer op die beste praktyke soos uiteengesit deur die Wêreldbank, hierdie risiko’s op die mees effektiewe manier gehanteer sal word. Die Suid-Afrikaanse voorstel is dus weens sy samestelling, nie voor sy inwerkingtreding reeds gedoem tot die ontwikkeling van ’n finansieringskrisis nie. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: On 9 February 2007 President Thabo Mbeki announced in his “State of the Nation Address” that proposals for an earnings-based national social security fund will be tabled as part of the 2007 budget. The framework for such a national social security fund is documented in a paper released by National Treasury and currently available for public feedback. The purpose of this system is to establish a fund which will ensure that members retain a certain level of income after retirement. This will be done by way of a compulsory tax, which will be deducted from members’ salaries on a monthly basis. This matter recently received widespread press coverage under the headlines “Lede wat nie vroeg genoeg doodgaan nie kan pensioenfondse knou”,”Aftreefonds-paniek” en “Nasionale fonds straks deur die private sektor bestuur, staat gaan nie almal se geld vat”. It is clear from these articles that the South African public is concerned about the prospect that the government indicated that they will be managing retirement funds under the national social security fund. It is also a well-known fact that similar systems worldwide are currently facing major financial pressure. The purpose of this research was to enable the South African public to make an informed decision regarding the financing risk associated with the proposed South African national social security fund by performing the following steps: · Identification of the causes of financing problems at social security funds worldwide. · To compare the proposed South African national social security fund to better practice for social security funds. · To consider whether the abovementioned causes of financing problems in social security funds worldwide, is also applicable to the South African situation. The research indicated the following: v · The main causes of financing crises in national social security funds worldwide are: the presence of final contribution schemes, the decline in the retirement age of the population, the presence of longer life expectancy and the decline in the population growth. · The proposed South African national social security fund is basically identical to the system of best practices as published by the World Bank. · The South African national social security fund will not follow the system of a final contribution scheme and will therefore not be exposed to the risk associated with these schemes. The fund will, however, in line with the international situation, be exposed to the risks associated with the decline in age of retirement, decline in population growth and an increase in life expectancy. Based on the findings listed above it is apparent that the South African proposal for a social security fund will be exposed to finance risks. The writer however believes that by basing the proposal on the best practices as set out by the World Bank, these risks will be mitigated in the most effective manner. The South African proposal is therefore, due to its composition, not doomed to the development of a financing crisis before its coming into existence.

Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2009. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: In November 2006 section 103(1) of the Act was abolished and replaced by a new Part IIA, containing sections 80A to 80L, which targets impermissible tax avoidance arrangements. Section 80A(c)(ii) introduced a new concept to the South African tax law: a misuse or abuse of the provisions of the Act, including Part IIA thereof. The objective of this study was to establish the origin, meaning, application and effect of section 80A(c)(ii) of the Act. The evolution of section 80A(c)(ii) was therefore examined where after the enacted version was analyzed. It was essential to determine the origin of section 80A(c)(ii) in order to establish some point of reference from which inferences could be drawn as to the possible application and effect thereof. Case law, practice statements and articles relating to its proposed root was then examined. A ‘misuse or abuse’ of a provision, it was found, implies, frustrating or exploiting the purpose of the provision. This contention was confirmed by existing Canadian precedent. Such an interpretation, however, has a strong resemblance to the words in which the draft version of section 80A(c)(ii) was couched. It is therefore in contrast to the presumption that different words (in the enacted version) imply a different meaning. The precise meaning of the words ‘misuse or abuse’ is thus still elusive. It was established that section 80A(c)(ii) has its roots in section 245 of the Canadian Act. Section 245(4) was regarded as an effective comparative to section 80A(c)(ii) as it also contained a so-called misuse or abuse rule. The application of this rule in the Canadian tax environment required the following process: - Interpret (contextually and purposively) the provisions relied on by the taxpayer, to determine their object, spirit and purpose. - Determine whether the transaction frustrates or defeats the object, spirit or purpose of the provisions. Section 245(4) had the effect of reviving the modern approach (a contextual and/or purposive theory) to the interpretation of statutes in Canada. Reference to the ‘spirit’ of a provision (above) was found not to extend the modern approach to statutory interpretation: it does not require of the court to look for some inner and spiritual meaning within the legislation. As section 245(4) was regarded as an effective comparative to section 80A(c)(ii) it was contented that it would have a similar effect, than that of its Canadian counterpart, on the approach to statutory interpretation in South Africa. However, it was established that a modern approach to statutory interpretation was already authoritative in South Africa. This finding led the author to the conclusion that section 80A(c)(ii) could at best only reinforce the case for applying such an approach. Such a purpose for section 80A(c)(ii) was however found to be void in the light of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, which was enacted in 1996, and provides a sovereign authority for the application of the modern approach. It was also found that the practical burden of showing that there was a ‘misuse or abuse of the provisions of this Act (including the provisions of this Part)’ will rest on the shoulders of the Commissioner, notwithstanding section 82 of the Act. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Artikel 103(1) van die Inkomstebelastingwet is herroep in November 2006 en vervang deur Deel IIA, bestaande uit artikels 80A tot 80L, wat daarop gemik is om ontoelaatbare belastingvermydingsreëlings te teiken. Artikel 80A(c)(ii) het ‘n nuwe konsep in die Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomstebelastingreg ingebring: ‘n misbruik of ‘n wangebruik van die bepalings van die Wet, insluitende Deel IIA. Die doel van hierdie studie was om die oorsprong, betekenis, toepassing en uitwerking van artikel 80A(c)(ii) vas te stel. Die ontwikkeling van artikel 80A(c)(ii) is daarom ondersoek waarna die verordende weergawe daarvan geanaliseer is. ‘n Sleutelaspek van die analise was om die oorsprong van artikel 80A(c)(ii) vas te stel. Hierdie oefening het ‘n verwysbare bron daargestel waarvan afleidings rondom die moontlike toepassing en uitwerking van artikel 80A(c)(ii) gemaak kon word. Hofsake, praktyknotas en artikels rakende die voorgestelde oorsprong is vervolgens ondersoek. Daar is vasgestel dat ‘n ‘misbruik of wangebruik’ van ‘n bepaling neerkom op die frustering of uitbuiting van die doel van ‘n bepaling. Hierdie bewering is bevestig deur bestaande Kanadese presedent. So ‘n interpretasie is egter soortgelyk aan die woorde waarin die konsepweergawe van artikel 80A(c)(ii) uitgedruk is. Dit is daarom in teenstelling met die vermoede dat ‘n wysiging van die woorde (in die verordende weergawe) ‘n gewysigde betekenis impliseer. Die presiese betekenis van die woorde ‘misbruik of wangebruik’ is dus steeds ontwykend. Daar is bevind dat artikel 80A(c)(ii) waarskynlik sy ontstaan in artikel 245 van die Kanadese Inkomstebelastingwet gehad het. Artikel 245(4) van die Kanadese Inkomstebelastingwet is beskou as ‘n effektiewe vergelykende artikel vir artikel 80A(c)(ii), aangesien dit ook oor ‘n sogenaamde misbruik of wangebruik reël beskik. Die toepassing van hierdie reël in die Kanadese belastingmilieu vereis die volgende werkswyse: - Interpreteer (kontekstueel en doeldienend) die bepalings waarop die belastingpligtige steun, ten einde die oogmerk, gees en doel daarvan vas te stel. - Bepaal of die transaksie, deur die belastingpligtige aangegaan, die oogmerk, gees of doel van die bepalings frustreer. Artikel 245(4) het aanleiding gegee tot die herstel van die moderne benadering (‘n kontekstuele en/of doeldienende teorie) tot die interpretasie van wetgewing in Kanada. Daar is bevind dat die verwysing na die ‘gees’ van ‘n bepaling (hierbo) nie aanleiding gee tot die uitbreiding van die moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg nie: dit vereis nie dat die hof moet soek na die innerlike of geestelike betekenis van die wetgewing nie. Aangesien artikel 245(4) as ‘n effektiewe vergelykende artikel vir artikel 80A(c)(ii) beskou is, is daar aangeneem dat dit ‘n soortgelyke uitwerking, as sy Kanadese eweknie, op wetsuitleg in Suid Afrika sal hê. By nadere ondersoek is daar egter bevind dat ‘n moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg alreeds gesaghebbend in Suid Afrika is. Hierdie bevinding het die skrywer tot die gevolgtrekking gebring dat artikel 80A(c)(ii), in beginsel, slegs die saak vir die moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg in Suid Afrika sal versterk. Indien hierdie die doel is wat die wetgewer gehad het met die verordening van artikel 80A(c)(ii), sal dit egter niksseggend wees in die lig van die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid Afrika, wat verorden is in 1996, en ‘n oppermagtige gesag bied vir die moderne benadering tot wetsuitleg. Daar is ook vasgestel dat die onus op die Kommissaris rus om te bewys dat daar ‘n ‘misbruik of wangebruik van die bepalings van hierdie Wet (waarby ingesluit die bepalings van hierdie Deel)’ was, ondanks artikel 82 van die Wet.

Thesis (MComm)--University of Stellenbosch, 2005. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Insetbelasting soos omskryf in artikel 1 van die Wet op Belasting op Toegevoegde Waarde No. 89 van 1991 (“die Wet”) kan teruggeëis word waar die goedere of dienste, ten opsigte waarvan die insetbelasting geëis word, vir die maak van belasbare lewerings verkry is. Waar goedere of dienste verkry word, gedeeltelik vir die maak van belasbare lewerings en gedeeltelik vir die maak van vrygestelde lewerings, moet ʼn toedeling van die insetbelasting ooreenkomstig die bepalings van Artikel 17(1) van die Wet gemaak word. Artikel 17(1) bepaal dat die omset-gebaseerde toedelingsmetode gebruik moet word vir die toedeling van toedeelbare insetbelasting. Hierdie metode wat voorgeskryf word gee aanleiding tot die volgende twee probleemstellings, naamlik : · Onduidelikheid in die Wet rakende die hantering van verskillende tipes lewerings binne die toedelingsformule, en · Onduidelikheid oor welke bedrae of gevalle by die toedelingsformule inof uitgesluit moet word. Artikel 17(1) bepaal ook dat, indien die omset-gebaseerde toedelings-metode nie toepaslik vir ʼn ondernemer is nie, ʼn alternatiewe metode gebruik kan word mits die alternatiewe metode ʼn redelike en regverdige alternatief daarstel. Hierdie uitsondering gee aanleiding tot ʼn derde probleemstelling, naamlik: · Wat kan as ʼn redelike en regverdige alternatief beskou word? Laastens maak Artikel 17(1) voorsiening vir ʼn voorbehoudsbepaling wat bekend staan as die de minimis-reël. Hiervolgens hoef ʼn ondernemer nie te voldoen aan Artikel 17(1) indien die ondernemer se totale belasbare lewerings minstens 95% van sy totale lewerings beloop nie. Die voorbehoudsbepaling maak egter nie voorsiening vir die hantering van abnormale omstandighede wat die implementering van die voorbehoudbepaling kan beïnvloed nie. Dit gee aanleiding tot die vierde probleemstelling, naamlik : · Watter maatreëls bestaan daar om te verseker dat die de minimis-reël nie deur abnormale omstandighede beïnvloed word nie? In hierdie studie word Artikel 17(1) krities ontleed ten einde te poog om oplossings vir bostaande probleemstellings te vind. Relevante wetgewing en publikasies van lande soos die Verenigde Koninkryk, Kanada, Australië en Ierland is ook bestudeer en na aanleiding hiervan kan die volgende afleidings gemaak word, naamlik: · dat ʼn lewering uit meer as een tipe lewering kan bestaan, hetsy belasbaar of vrygestel. Sodanige lewerings kan geklassifiseer word as toevallige-, saamgestelde- of gemengde lewerings wat, afhangend van die tipe lewering, die insetbelasting wat teruggeëis mag word, verskillend kan beïnvloed. Uitsluitsel oor die klassifikasies van lewerings moet verkry word alvorens dit in die toedelingsformule ingesluit word; · dat die in- of uitsluiting van spesifieke bedrae en gevalle in die toedelingsformule eerstens aan die hand van die ekonomiese aktiwiteitstoets gemeet moet word. Die resultate van ʼn ekonomiese aktiwiteitstoets sal aandui watter invloed ʼn spesifieke bedrag of geval op die toedelingsformule kan hê. Die spesifieke eienskappe van elke bedrag of geval moet daarna ontleed word om te bepaal of sodanige bedrag of geval by die toedelingsformule in- of uitgesluit moet word om die manipulasie van die toedelingsformule te voorkom; · dat riglyne bepaal moet word of die toepassing van ʼn alternatiewe toedelingsmetode redelik en regverdig is ten einde enige onsekerhede uit die weg te ruim. Dit behoort op ‘n soortgelyke wyse geïmplementeer te word as die bestaande riglyne in die wetgewing van lande soos Kanada, Ierland en die Verenigde Koninkryk; · dat die de minimis-reël uitgebrei moet word deur nie net na ʼn vaste persentasie te verwys nie, maar ook die gebruik van historiese syfers, randwaardes en maandelikse ontledings in te sluit, soos wat dit tans die gebruik in Kanada en die Verenigde Koninkryk is. Daar bestaan dus reeds in ander lande wetgewing wat die probleemareas, soos in die Suid-Afrikaanse wetgewing geïdentifiseer, aanspreek. Dit is dus nodig om aan die hand hiervan die Suid-Afrikaanse wetgewing uit te brei ten einde enige onduidelikhede en areas vir moontlike manipulasie uit te skakel / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Input tax as defined in Section 1 of the Value Added Tax Act No. 89 of 1991 (“the Act”) can be deducted where goods or services are acquired by the vendor for the purpose of consumption, use or supply in the course of making taxable supplies. Where the goods or services are acquired by the vendor partially for the purpose of making taxable supplies and partially for the purpose of making exempt supplies, an apportionment of the input tax that can be deducted, has to be done in terms of Section 17(1) of the Act. Section 17(1) determines that the turnover-based apportionment method should be used for apportionment of the input tax. This prescribed method gives rise to the following problem statements: · The Act is not clear as to how different types of supplies should be treated in the apportionment formula, and · The Act is not clear as to which specific amounts or cases should be included or excluded from the apportionment formula. Section 17(1) further determines that, if a vendor finds the turnover-based method of apportionment inappropriate, the vendor can use an alternative method as long as the method is a fair and reasonable alternative. This exemption to the rule gives rise to a third problem statement, namely: · What should be seen as fair and reasonable alternative method? Finally, a proviso is found in Section 17(1), better known as the de minimisrule. According to the rule no apportionment is necessary in terms of Section 17(1) if the total taxable supplies constitute at least 95% of total supplies. The proviso does not take abnormal circumstances into account that can affect the implementation of the proviso. This gives rise to the fourth problem statement: · What controls exist to ensure that the de minimis-rule is not influenced by abnormal circumstances? In this study Section 17(1) is critically analyzed to find solutions for the above problem statements. Relevant acts and publications of countries such as the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and Ireland were examined. The following conclusions can be drawn from the study: · A supply can consist out of more than one type of supply, either taxable or exempt. These supplies can be classified as coincidental supplies, combined supplies or mixed supplies. Each one of these supplies can have a material influence on the apportionment formula and should be considered carefully before they are included in the formula. · The inclusion or exclusion of any specific amount or case as part of the apportionment formula should first be measured against the economic activity test. The results of the economic activity test will indicate which effect the specific amount or case will have on the apportionment formula. Thereafter the distinctive characteristics of the amount or case should be analysed to ensure correct treatment of the specific amount or case in the apportionment formula to prevent the manipulation of the apportionment formula. · Guidelines should be identified to determine whether an alternative method of apportionment is fair and reasonable, in conjunction with the specific guidelines identified by the legislation of countries such as Canada, Ireland and the United Kingdom. · The de minimis-rule should be broadened not to only include the use of a fixed percentage, but also the use of historical figures, rand values and monthly analysis as is the case in Canada and the United Kingdom. As can be seen from the above there already exist legislation in other countries that addresses the problem areas as identified in South African legislation. It is therefore necessary to broaden the South African legislation to eliminate any uncertainties and areas for possible manipulation.

Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die belastingaftrekbaarheid van werknemerverwante voorwaardelike aanspreeklik-hede, met spesifieke verwysing na die verkoop of beëindiging van ʼn besigheid, is in meegaande studie ondersoek. Dit word bevind dat in die geval van die beëindiging van ‘n besigheid, alle voorwaardelike aanspreeklikhede op datum van beëindiging van die besigheid, waarskynlik nooit vervul kan word nie, spesifiek in geval waar dit gekoppel is aan die vereiste dat ʼn werknemer op ʼn toekomstige datum steeds in diens moet wees van die besigheid. Die voorwaardelike verpligting word dus nooit vervul nie en geen betalings hoef aan voormalige werknemers gemaak te word nie. Geen aftrekking aan die voormalige werkgewer word dus toegestaan in gevalle waar verlof- of bonusbetalings gemaak word na beëindiging van die besigheid, indien die verpligting nie reeds onvoorwaardelik bestaan het voordat die beëindiging van die besigheid plaasgevind het nie. Dit word verder bevind dat in die geval waar ʼn besigheid gelikwideer word, die voormalige en voornemende werkgewer se verpligting teenoor die werknemers se voorwaardelike aanspreeklikhede verval. Verder is dit ook waarskynlik dat geen belastingaftrekking toegestaan sal word nie, omrede die voorwaardelike aanspreeklikheid nie vervul is op datum van likwidasie nie. Dit word verder bevind dat in die geval waar ʼn besigheid as lopende saak verkoop word, die voornemende werkgewer ingevolge Artikel 197 van die Wet op Arbeidsverhoudinge verplig word om alle dienskontrakte, tesame met alle regte en verpligtinge wat bestaan tydens die oordrag, oor te neem asof hy in wese in die skoene tree van die voormalige werkgewer. Voorts word die voormalige werkgewer ook gebind aan die betaling van bedrae, soos deur die verkoopskontrak bepaal, of andersins in gevalle waar die voornemende werkgewer nie die verpligting om te betaal, kan nakom nie. Beide die voormalige en voornemende werkgewer bly dus wetlik aanspreeklik vir die betaling van bedrae soos uitgestippel in die verkoopskontrak, in gevalle waar ‘n besigheid as lopende saak verkoop word. Dit word verder bevind dat die Inkomstebelastingwet ‘n belastingaftrekking moet toestaan aan die voormalige of voornemende werkgewer wat ‘n werknemerverwante-betaling maak uit hoofde van die wette soos neergelê deur die Wet op Arbeidsverhoudinge. Sodoende sal die Inkomstebelastingwet die oogmerke van die Wet op Arbeidsverhoudinge onderskraag, met gevolglike voordelige uitwerking op die ekonomie en beskerming van werknemers se werksekuriteit. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study explores the tax deductibility of employee-related contingent liabilities, with specific reference to the sale or discontinuation of a business. It is concluded that in the case of the discontinuation of business activities, all contingent liabilities at the date of discontinuation (with the specific requirement that employees will still be employed by the business at a future date) will probably never be fulfilled. The contingent liability is thus never fulfilled and no payments need be made to the former employees. No tax deduction is therefore granted to the former employer where leave or bonus payments were made after the discontinuance of business activities, if the liability did not unconditionally exist prior to the discontinuance of the business. It is further concluded that in the case of the liquidation of a business, the former and prospective employers are released from any obligation towards the contingent liabilities of the employees. Furthermore it is also unlikely that any tax deduction will be granted, due to the contingent liability being unfulfilled at the date of liquidation. It is further concluded that in the case where a business is sold as a going concern, the prospective employer is obliged to take over all existing employee contracts as well as all rights and obligations existing at the time of transfer, in terms of Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The former employer is also bound to the payment of amounts, as stipulated by the contract of sale, or otherwise in cases where the prospective employer cannot honour the liability to pay. Both former and prospective employers are legally liable for the payment of amounts as stipulated in the contract of sale, in cases where a business is sold as a going concern. It is further concluded that the Income Tax Act should allow a tax deduction to the former or prospective employer who makes an employee-related payment in terms of the Labour Relations Act. As a result the Income Tax Act will support the objectives of the Labour Relations Act, resulting in a positive effect on the economy as well as the protection of employees’ work security.

Thesis (MAcc)--University of Stellenbosch, 2003.

Thesis (MAcc)--Stellenbosch University, 2011. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The quality of external audits has increasingly come under the spotlight over the last decade as a result of a number of audit failures. The use of scientifically based statistical sampling as a sampling technique is allowed, but not required by International Standards on Auditing. The science behind this sampling technique can add to the credibility and quality of the audit. Accordingly the main objective of this study was to explore certain key aspects of the use of statistical sampling as a sampling technique in the audits of financial statements done by South African Registered Auditors accredited by the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). A literature review of the most recent local and international studies related to the key aspects addressed in this study was done. An empirical study was then done by means of a questionnaire that was sent to the JSE-accredited auditing firms for completion. The questionnaire focused on what was allowed by the firms’ audit methodologies regarding the key aspects investigated in this study and not on the actual usage of statistical sampling in audits performed by the firms. The following main conclusions were drawn in respect of the four key aspects that were investigated: 1. In investigating the extent to which statistical sampling is used by auditing firms, it was found that the majority of them was allowed to use the principles of statistical sampling. Upon further investigation it was found that only 38% were explicitly allowed to use it in all three sampling steps (size determination, selection of items and evaluation of results). The evaluation step was identified as the most problematic statistical sampling phase. 2. Two reasons why auditors decided not use statistical sampling as a sampling technique were identified, namely the perceived inefficiency (costliness) of the statistical sampling process, and a lack of understanding, training and experience in the use thereof. 3. In investigating how professional judgement is exercised in the use of statistical sampling, it was found that the audit methodologies of the majority of the auditing firms prescribed the precision and confidence levels to be used, and further that the minority indicated that they were allowed to adjust these levels using their professional judgement. The partner in charge of the audit was identified to be typically responsible for final authorisation of the sampling approach to be followed. 4. It was found that approximately a third of the auditing firms did not use computer software for assistance in using statistical sampling. The majority of the auditing firms did however have a written guide on how to use statistical sampling in practice available as a resource to staff. The value of this study lies in its contribution to the existing body of knowledge in South Africa regarding the use of statistical sampling in auditing. Stakeholders in statistical sampling as an auditing technique that can benefit from this study include Registered Auditors in practice, academics, and, from regulatory, education and training perspectives, the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors and the South African Institute of Chartered Accountants. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Na aanleiding van 'n aantal oudit mislukkings in die afgelope dekade het die kwaliteit van eksterne oudits toenemend onder die soeklig gekom. Die gebruik van wetenskaplik gebaseerde statistiese steekproefneming word deur die International Standards on Auditing toegelaat, maar nie vereis nie, as 'n steekproefnemingstegniek. Die wetenskap agter hierdie steekproefnemingstegniek kan tot die geloofwaardigheid en die kwaliteit van die oudit bydra. Die hoofdoel van hierdie studie was gevolglik om sekere sleutel aspekte van die gebruik van statistiese steekproefneming as 'n steekproefnemingstegniek in die oudits van finansiële state soos gedoen deur Suid-Afrikaanse Geregistreerde Ouditeure geakkrediteer deur die Johannesburgse Effektebeurs (JSE), te verken. 'n Literatuurstudie van die mees onlangse plaaslike en internasionale studies wat verband hou met die sleutel aspekte wat in hierdie studie aangespreek word, is gedoen. 'n Empiriese studie is daarna gedoen met behulp van 'n vraelys wat vir die voltooiing aan die JSE-geakkrediteerde ouditeursfirmas gestuur is. Die vraelys het gefokus op wat toegelaat word deur die firmas se oudit metodologieë ten opsigte van die sleutel aspekte ondersoek in hierdie studie en nie op die werklike gebruik van statistiese steekproefneming in oudits wat deur die firmas uitgevoer word nie. Die volgende hoofgevolgtrekkings is gemaak ten opsigte van die vier sleutel aspekte wat ondersoek is: 1. In die ondersoek na die mate waarin statistiese steekproefneming gebruik word deur ouditeursfirmas, is gevind dat die meerderheid toegelaat was om die beginsels van statistiese steekproefneming te gebruik. By verdere ondersoek is gevind dat slegs 38% uitdruklik toegelaat word om dit te gebruik in al drie steekproefneming stappe (grootte-bepaling, keuse van items en evaluering van resultate). Die evalueringstap is geïdentifiseer as die mees problematiese statistiese steekproefnemings fase. 2. Twee redes waarom ouditeure besluit het om nie statistiese steekproefneming as 'n steekproefnemingstegniek te gebruik nie is geïdentifiseer, naamlik die vermeende ondoeltreffendheid (hoë koste) van die statistiese steekproefnemingsproses, en 'n gebrek aan begrip, opleiding en ondervinding in die gebruik daarvan. 3. Met die ondersoek van die wyse waarop professionele oordeel uitgeoefen word in die gebruik van statistiese steekproefneming, is gevind dat die presisiepeil en vertrouensvlakke wat gebruik word deur die meerderheid van die ouditeursfirmas se oudit metodologieë voorgeskryf word, en verder het die minderheid aangedui dat hulle hierdie vlakke mag aanpas deur hul professionele oordeel te gebruik. Die vennoot in beheer van die oudit is geïdentifiseer as tipies verantwoordelik vir die finale goedkeuring van die steekproefnemingsbenadering wat gevolg word . 4. Daar is gevind dat ongeveer 'n derde van die ouditeursfirmas nie gebruik maak van rekenaarsagteware vir bystand in die gebruik van statistiese steekproefneming nie. Die meerderheid van die ouditeursfirmas het egter 'n geskrewe gids oor hoe om statistiese steekproefneming in die praktyk te gebruik as 'n hulpmiddel aan personeel beskikbaar. Die waarde van hierdie studie lê in sy bydrae tot die bestaande liggaam van kennis in Suid-Afrika met betrekking tot die gebruik van statistiese steekproefneming in ouditkunde. Belanghebbers in statistiese steekproefneming as 'n oudittegniek wat kan baat vind by hierdie studie sluit in Geregistreerde Ouditeure in praktyk, akademici, en, vanuit regulerings-, opvoedings- en opleidingsperspektiewe, die Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors en die Suid-Afrikaanse Instituut van Geoktrooieerde Rekenmeesters.

Thesis (MComm) -- Stellenbosch University, 2011. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The study’s focus is to provide an analysis of the development of the definition of royalties in the context of Model Tax Conventions (‘MTC’). The secondary focus of the study is to analyse the evolution of the concept of beneficial ownership as a limitation to the application of the treaty benefits contained in royalty provisions of the MTC’s. In terms of the focus of the study, it is concluded that the most significant developments with regards to the definition of royalties, since originating in the League of Nations Model Convention’s first Draft Model in 1928, occurred during the final Committee meetings held in Mexico and London (producing the Mexico and London Draft Models respectively) and in terms of the Organisation for European Economic Cooperation (‘OEEC’), which set out the founding principles of the definition. It is also concluded that the later MTC’s did not significantly change the Treaty royalty definition but added clarification as to the meaning of the term by way of the Commentaries to the MTC. The secondary focus of the study concludes that the term has not really changed since it was first used in an international context. The most recent case law on the matter confirmed that the attributes of the concept is that of ownership and that the matter is one which needs to be decided from a legalistic perspective and should not be based on the economic interpretation of the term ‘beneficial ownership’, which could effectively turn the concept into a broad anti-avoidance provision. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: geen opsomming

Thesis (MAcc)--Stellenbosch University, 2012. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: The primary aim of this study is to provide a critical evaluation of the correctness of the judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeal in the case of Commissioner: South African Revenue Services v Brummeria Renaissance (Pty) Ltd [2007] SCA 99 (RSA). The primary question investigated in this study, is whether the court had indeed decided correctly when it concluded that: “…the right to retain and use the borrowed funds without paying interest had a money value, and accordingly that the value of such a right must be included in the companies‟ gross income for the years in which such rights accrued to the companies.” The question will be investigated by: i. evaluating the relevance of the doctrine plus valet quod agitur quod quam simulate concipitur (the “plus valet-doctrine”) and the in fraudem legis-doctrine, in relation to the facts of the Brummeria-case; ii. consideration of certain basic principles regarding „rights‟ (real rights, corporeal rights as well as rights of recovery and performances), „property‟, interpretation of contracts as it manifests in South African Law, and the common law principles regarding mutuum and considering the relevance thereof in the Brummeria-case; iii. considering the principles of pactum antichreseos and the relevance thereof to the facts of the Brummeria-case; iv. considering further legal tax technical aspects with a view to consider whether the “accruals” of the Brummeria-case have indeed constituted an „amount‟ for purposes of the „gross income‟-definition in section 1 of the Act; and v. considering the exact moment (or year of assessment) when an amount (based on the assumption that an „amount‟ has accrued to the taxpayer) had to be included in the taxpayer‟s gross income. The relevance of United States tax rules (regarding the income tax implications of interest-free loans) on interest-free loans in Life Rights Agreements will also be considered. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die oorkoepelende doelstelling van hierdie studie is om ‘n kritiese evaluering van die korrektheid van die Hoogste Hof van Appèl se uitspraak in die saak van Kommissaris: Suid-Afrikaanse Inkomstediens v Brummeria Renaissance (Edms) Bpk [2007] SCA 99 (RSA) te verskaf. Die oorkoepelende vraagstuk wat in hierdie studie ondersoek word, is of die Hof inderdaad gelyk gehad het ten opsigte van die beslissing dat: “…the right to retain and use the borrowed funds without paying interest had a money value, and accordingly that the value of such a right must be included in the companies’ gross income for the years in which such rights accrued to the companies.” Hierdie vraagstuk sal ondersoek word deur: i. die toepaslikheid van die leerstelling plus valet quod agitur quod quam simulate concipitur (die “plus valet-leerstelling”) en die in fraudem legis-leerstelling op die Brummeria-feitestel te oorweeg; ii. sekere basiese beginsels rakende ‘regte’ (saaklike regte en sake sowel as vorderingsregte en prestasies), ‘eiendom’, uitleg van kontrakte soos dit in die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg manifesteer, en die gemeenregtelike beginsels rakende mutuum te ondersoek en die toepaslikheid daarvan in die Brummeria-saak te oorweeg; iii. die beginsels van pactum antichreseos en die toepaslikheid daarvan in die Brummeria-feitestel te oorweeg; iv. verdere regstegniese aspekte vanuit ‘n belastingoogpunt te ondersoek ten einde te oorweeg of die “toevallings” van die Brummeria-saak inderdaad ‘n ‘bedrag’ vir doeleindes van die ‘bruto inkomste’-definisie in artikel 1 van die Wet daarstel; en v. oorweging te skenk aan die juiste tydstip (oftewel jaar van aanslag) waarop ‘n bedrag (gebaseer op die aanname dat ‘n ‘bedrag’ die belastingpligtige wel toegeval het) by die belastingpligtige se bruto inkomste ingesluit moet word. Voorts sal die toepaslikheid van Amerikaanse belastingreëls (betreffende die inkomstebelastingimplikasies van rentevrye lenings) op die rentevrye lenings in die Lewensregooreenkomste ook oorweeg word.