Cette étude porte sur la méthode de corrélation de Paul Tillich. Elle s'intéresse plus particulièrement à l'origine de la méthode de corrélation dans un écrit encore peu connu de Tillich, la Dogmatik de 1925. Ce mémoire vise en fait à dégager les différences et les continuités fondamentales que l'on peut observer entre la Dogmatique (1925) et la Théologie systématique (1951-1963), précisément en ce qui a trait à la méthode de corrélation. À travers l'analyse de la Dogmatique, il s'agit de vérifier l'hypothèse selon laquelle la méthode de corrélation se trouve déjà en germe dans la Dogmatique, plus particulièrement dans le concept de corrélation révélationnelle, et serait issue de l'effort déployé par Tillich pour rendre compte du pôle objectif et du pôle subjectif de la révélation. En posant d'abord une question épistémologique à la Dogmatique, pour ensuite se pencher sur son contenu, cette étude tente finalement de percevoir la signification de la méthode de corrélation dans l'œuvre de Tillich, en comparant les deux points extrêmes dans l'évolution de sa synthèse théologique.

The topic of Tillich and Judaism has received relatively little scholarly treatment. This is despite the importance of Jews and Judaism for Tillich, which is established by numerous biographical details, including the reason for his opposition to the Nazi government and ensuing emigration to the United States in 1933 (Introduction and Chapter 1). Tillich’s ecumenical activities are acknowledged, but Tillich’s dialectical theological method is analyzed to determine how it could have justified his pro-Jewish stance. This refers to his consistent attacks on anti-Semitism, and after World War II, numerous lectures on the structural similarities between Judaism and Christianity, not to mention lifetime relationships with secular and religious Jews (Chapters 1 and 2). Tillich has a dialectical understanding of reality, influenced by F. W. J. Schelling, and this influences every major aspect of his theology. Select primary sources are analyzed to assess the evolution of Tillich’s idea of Judaism through his dialectical, theological and inclusive history of religion (Chapters 3 through 6). ‘Jewish prophetism’, highlighting the critical and existential dimensions of Judaism, emerged as the most characteristic expression, significantly, after World War I, as Tillich rejected the religious nationalism of his early adulthood. After World War II and the Holocaust, Tillich’s ‘dialectic of the Holy’ expressed the fullness of the divine reality as the permanent polar tension between the priestly/mystical/vertical/’Is’, and the prophetic/critical/horizontal/’Ought’. This polar tension is found in his ontology, Christology, and history of religion. The importance of Jewish prophetism, rooted in historic Judaism, would have made it difficult for Tillich to eliminate the Jewish roots of Christianity, compared to the so-called ‘German Christians’ prevalent in Weimar and Nazi Germany. Chapter 7 concludes with a criticism and defence of Tillich’s method. Tillich’s idea of Judaism is inadequate for interfaith dialogue, because it fails to address the fullness of Judaism’s own self-understandings, and is limited to the prophetic aspect. However, the prophetic aspect ensures that the critical and existential aspects of any religion endure in a transformation to a more adequate expression of the divine. Tillich’s ‘religion of the concrete spirit’ not only preserves the importance of Jewish prophetism, but opens the door to dialogue with non-theistic religions, such as Buddhism.

黃天生. / "2005年1月". / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2005. / 參考文獻(leaves [1]-[5], 2nd group). / "2005 nian 1 yue". / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Huang Tiansheng. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2005. / Can kao wen xian (leaves [1]-[5], 2nd group). / Chapter 1. --- 引言 / Chapter 1.1 --- 硏究之背景 --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- 硏究目的 --- p.4 / Chapter 1.3 --- 硏究方法及結構 --- p.8 / Chapter 2. --- 關聯法之一極一一對處境之理解 / Chapter 2.1 --- 田立克關聯法對處境之理解 --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1.1 --- 引言 --- p.10 / Chapter 2.1.2 --- 田立克自覺處身於時代的轉接階段 --- p.13 / Chapter 2.1.3 --- 田立克對現代性中心問題之反省 --- p.14 / Chapter 2.1.4 --- 從現代性的特徵帶出人存在之根本問題 --- p.16 / Chapter 2.1.5 --- 過往方法的評檢 --- p.19 / Chapter 2.2 --- 徐思相互批判關聯對處境之理解 --- p.22 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- 引言 --- p.22 / Chapter 2.2.2 --- 時代轉變的中心問題一一從現代至後現代 --- p.24 / Chapter 2.2.3 --- 處境的轉變，修正的需要 --- p.32 / Chapter 2.3 --- 從田立克至徐思 --- p.34 / Chapter 3. --- 關聯法之一極一一對宗教信仰之理解 / Chapter 3.1 --- 田立克關聯法之一極一一對宗教信仰的理解 --- p.35 / Chapter 3.1.1 --- 引信 --- p.35 / Chapter 3.1.2 --- 終極關懷作爲宗教普遍性的基礎 --- p.38 / Chapter 3.1.3 --- 終極關懷到基督宗教的上帝 --- p.41 / Chapter 3.1.4 --- 終極關懷與耶穌是基督一一基督教的獨特性 --- p.43 / Chapter 3.2 --- 徐思關聯法之一極一一對宗教信仰的理解 --- p.46 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- 引言 --- p.46 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- 徐思對宗教之定義 --- p.47 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- 宗教之定義´ؤ´ؤ極限經驗 --- p.49 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- 宗教之定義一一經典 --- p.53 / Chapter 3.2.5 --- 從經典的理解到基督論之建構 --- p.58 / Chapter 3.3 --- 從田立克至徐思 --- p.59 / Chapter 4. --- 關聯法之方法論一一如何關聯的問題 / Chapter 4.1 --- 田立克關聯法之方法論框架 --- p.61 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- 引言 --- p.61 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- 問題與答案之關係 --- p.63 / Chapter 4.1.3 --- 形式與內容之關係 --- p.67 / Chapter 4.2 --- 徐思關聯法之方法論框架 --- p.72 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- 引言 --- p.72 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- 詮釋學之於經典的嫁接 --- p.73 / Chapter 4.2.3 --- 批判技巧之運用 --- p.75 / Chapter 4.2.4 --- 類比想像的意思 --- p.77 / Chapter 4.3 --- 從田立克至徐思 --- p.80 / Chapter 5. --- 總結 / Chapter 5.1 --- 引言 --- p.82 / Chapter 5.2 --- 進入多元世界的田立克 --- p.83 / Chapter 5.3 --- 徐思在關聯法裏修正了甚麼？ --- p.86

劉卓輝. / "2009年9月". / "2009 nian 9 yue". / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 121-125). / Abstracts in Chinese and English. / Liu Zhuohui. / 論文摘要 --- p.頁ii / Chapter 第一章 --- 導言 --- p.頁5 / 背景 --- p.5 / 文獻回顧 --- p.12 / 論文主旨 --- p.17 / Chapter 第二章 --- 蒂利希拯救論的框架：上帝與世界的關係 --- p.頁19 / 引言 --- p.19 / 「文化神學」、及宗教與文化的關係 --- p.20 / 上帝與世界的關係、及恩典的內蘊性 --- p.25 / 「新教原則」與「大公實質」的互補及相互重要性 --- p.32 / 小結 --- p.46 / Chapter 第三章 --- 蒂利希論稱義 --- p.頁47 / 引言 --- p.47 / 「因恩典藉信稱義」 --- p.47 / 蒂利希對「信」和「恩典」的理解 --- p.55 / 蒂利希對稱義的理解和信義宗傳統的關係 --- p.61 / 小結 --- p.69 / Chapter 第四章 --- 蒂利希論拯救的多重向度 --- p.頁70 / 引言 --- p.70 / 多重向度的拯救 --- p.70 / 稱義與拯救的關係 --- p.78 / 對信義宗和天主教拯救觀的雙重批判 --- p.86 / 小結 --- p.92 / Chapter 第五章 --- 對信義宗-天主教有關稱義/成義的對話的意義 --- p.頁93 / 引言 --- p.93 / 「恩典」的觀念 --- p.93 / 如何理解稱義/成義？ --- p.100 / 稱義/成義在教義中的地位 --- p.106 / 對蒂利希的一些批判性評價 --- p.113 / 小結 --- p.117 / Chapter 第六草 --- 結論 --- p.頁118 / 參考書目 --- p.頁120

Texte remanié de: Habilitationsschrift--Theologische Fakultät--Erlangen-Nürnberg--Friedriechh-Alexander-Universität, 2000. Titre de soutenance : Die Zukunft des kosmischen Christus : theologische Analysen der Genese und Tendenzen eines modernen Christologumenons. / Bibliogr. p. 453-500. Index.

Texte remanié de: Diss.--Heidelberg--Theologische Fakultät, 1999. Titre de soutenance : Die Rede von Gottes Allmacht angesichts von Leiden : zur Interpretation der Gotteslehre in den systematisch-theologischen Entwürfen von Paul Althaus, Paul Tillich und Karl Barth. / Bibliogr. p. 269-294.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Chicago, Divinity School, December 2003. / Includes bibliographical references. Also available on the Internet.

Zugl.: Marburg, Univ., Diss., 2008

Ph. D. thesis--Oxford. / Bibliogr. p. 280-295. Index.

Akademisk avhandling--Teologi--Åbo, 1982. / Bibliogr. p. 327-346. Index. Résumé en anglais.