Introduction: The Modified Mallampati Tongue score is a quick and reliable method commonly used in anesthesiology to assess airway patency and predict the ease of intubation. Modified Mallampati Tongue scores range from I – IV with higher Mallampati scores being associated with more difficult intubations as well as increased sleep-disordered breathing, such as obstructive sleep apnea. The Mallampati Tongue score is determined by visibility of the oropharynx when the mouth is opened as wide as possible with the tongue maximally protruded and is directly affected by the position of the tongue. The tongue is an influential muscle to the craniofacial complex; it plays an essential role in the development of the dentoalveolar structures, and its position affects airway volume which influences natural head posture, which influences craniofacial growth. Objective: The primary aims of this study were to identify if any associations exist between Modified Mallampati Tongue scores (I-IV) and 1) craniofacial sagittal and vertical relationships of the jaws and 2) craniofacial head posture (including the postural relationships of the cervical vertebrae, hyoid bone, cranium, and tongue). A secondary aim was to identify if any associations exist between Modified Mallampati Tongue score and age, sex, or race/ethnicity. Methods: This retrospective study included 400 subjects from the Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry Department of orthodontics who had pre-orthodontic treatment diagnostic records obtained from June 1st 2020 through September 1st 2021. Each patient’s Modified Mallampati Tongue score (I-IV) was recorded in an intraoral photograph of maximum mouth opening with tongue protrusion. All lateral cephalograms were traced in Dolphin Imaging and Amira Morphometrics Software by two examiners tracing 200 subjects each. The craniofacial morphological features were analyzed through the Steiner, Wits, and McNamara analyses for assessment of the sagittal relationships of the maxilla and mandible and by the Jarabak analysis for assessment of the vertical relationships and divergence. Craniofacial head posture was assessed through an analysis that represents the postural relationships of the cervical vertebrae, cranium, length/height of the tongue, and position of the hyoid bone. For statistical analysis, One-way ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and Chi-square tests were conducted. Probability values of <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Overall, this study included 400 subjects with ages ranging from 7-73 years old (mean age of 17.99 years), of which there were 288 females (72%) and 112 males (28%). Of the 400 subjects, 60% (241) were African American, 32% (127) Hispanic, 7% (26) Caucasian, and 2% (6) Asian. The most prevalent Modified Mallampati Tongue Score was III (142 subjects, 36%). Out of all of the craniofacial morphology and head posture variables compared against Modified Mallampati Tongue scores (I-IV), significant findings from the one-way ANOVA tests included vertical position of the hyoid bone to the neck, vertical position of the hyoid bone to the mandible, ANB, and Wits values. Higher Mallampati Tongue scores were associated with higher ANB and higher Wits values. Greater Mallampati scores were associated with increased vertical distance of the hyoid bone to the mandible and to the neck, meaning a lower position of the hyoid bone. In addition, correlations that were statistically significant given a 95% confidence interval, included significant positive correlations between Mallampati Tongue score and increased ANB, Wits, and distance of the hyoid to the mandible and to the neck. Pearson’s Correlation Index also showed a significant negative correlation between Mallampati Tongue scores and craniofacial morphology values for SNB and pogonion to nasion-perpendicular, showing that increased Modified Mallampati Tongue scores correlate with more retrognathic mandibles. When evaluating the results of the Chi-Square analyses, there were no significant differences between Modified Mallampati Tongue score and race/ethnicity or age, but there was a significant difference between genders showing that women were more likely to have lower Mallampati Tongue scores than men. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability for the craniofacial head posture measurements, craniofacial morphology measurements, and Modified Mallampati Tongue scores were excellent (correlation coefficients: 0.84 – 0.99). Conclusions: This study reveals that a higher Modified Mallampati Tongue score correlates with higher ANB and Wits values, meaning that higher Modified Mallampati Tongue scores are associated with a Skeletal Class II relationship of the jaws, which could be due to retrognathic mandibular growth. In addition, a higher Modified Mallampati Tongue score is significantly associated with increased distance of the hyoid bone to the mandible and to the neck. This study also found women more likely to have lower Modified Mallampati Tongue scores than men. The results of this study allude to the potential for Mallampati Tongue scores to be used as predictors of Class II skeletal sagittal growth which would ultimately help with orthodontic treatment planning decisions and enhance overall treatment outcomes. / Oral Biology

Introduction: Une respiration buccale est souvent associée à une faible musculature oro-faciale et à une position basse de la langue, pouvant mener aux malocclusions et au potentiel de développer des problèmes de respiration pendant le sommeil chez les enfants. Objectifs: Évaluer l’efficacité de la thérapie oro-faciale myofonctionnelle sur le rétablissement d’une déglutition physiologique et d’une respiration nasale en développant une posture linguale et labiale normale au repos. Méthodes: Cette étude contrôlée randomisée prospective à simple aveugle a évalué 37 patients (six à quatorze ans) divisés en deux groupes où un groupe a reçu une thérapie complète (7 séances), comprenant des exercices pour la correction du patron de déglutition et de la posture linguale, et l’autre groupe a reçu une thérapie sommaire, corrigeant seulement la posture linguale (3 séances). Des suivis à trois mois et à un an post-traitement ont été effectués pour les deux groupes. Résultats: Les résultats des deux traitements, soient la thérapie complète et la thérapie sommaire, sont similaires (p = 0.59) et également efficaces pour la correction de la déglutition atypique et le rétablissement d’une respiration nasale, avec une différence significative entre les évaluations avant et après traitement (p = 0.001), qui demeure stable après un an post-traitement. Conclusion: Le traitement avec des exercices spécifiques pour une correction d’une propulsion linguale ne serait pas une composante absolue d’une thérapie oro-faciale myofonctionnelle afin de rétablir une posture linguale adéquate au repos et un patron de respiration nasale chez les enfants n’ayant pas d’autre problème fonctionnel connu. / Introduction: Mouth breathing is often associated with a weak orofacial musculature and a low resting tongue position, leading to malocclusion and potentially sleep-disordered breathing in children. Objective: To evaluate the effect of orofacial myofunctional therapy on the reestablishment of a mature pattern of swallowing and nasal breathing by stabilizing a proper position of the tongue and lips at rest. Methods: This prospective randomized single-blind controlled study evaluated 37 patients (age six to fourteen years) divided into two groups who received either a complete orofacial myofunctional therapy (7 sessions) including swallowing pattern and tongue posture, or a simplified therapy modifying their tongue posture (3 sessions). Both groups were seen at three months and one year following treatment completion. Results: Results suggested that treatment outcomes were similar when treating tongue-lip posture at rest along with tongue thrust, and treating without addressing tongue thrust (p = 0.59). Both treatments were efficacious as there was a significant difference between the pre- and post- evaluations for both groups (p < 0.001), and these differences remained stable at the one year follow-up. Conclusion: Treating a tongue thrust habit with specific related exercises, may not be a necessary component of an orofacial myofunctional therapy to reestablish tongue posture at rest and nasal breathing in children with no other functional problems.