Bakgrund och problemdiskussion: Företag motiverar vanligtvis centraliserad finansiering med att det leder till värdeökande effekter, något som forskningsvärlden endast teoretiskt berört vilket ger indikationer på att en centraliserad finansiering kan utgöra en värdeökande strategi. Det föreligger därmed ett intresse att undersöka detta empiriskt. Avsaknaden av ett mått för centraliseringsgraden av finansiering medför att framställande av detta mått dock måste genomföras före teorin om värdeökning kan testas empiriskt. Syfte: Studien syftar till att 1) ta fram ett mått för centraliseringsgraden av finansiering, 2) säkerställa validiteten i detta mått och 3) genom detta mått testa centraliseringsgradens effekt på företagsvärde. Metod: Första syftet uppfylls genom en explorativ studie där närliggande teorier använts tillsammans med observationer av verkligheten. Andra syftet uppfylls genom en mindre statistisk undersökning utifrån årsredovisningar samt en enkätundersökning riktad till experter inom området. Tredje syftet uppnås genom en kvantitativ studie där formulerade hypoteser testas i en statistisk undersökning på 152 svenska börsnoterade bolag.  Resultat och slutsatser: Studien säkerställer ett approximativt mått för centraliseringsgraden av finansiering. Måttets samband med företagsvärde kan dock inte säkerställas. Centraliseringsgraden har däremot ett samband med företagsvärde under vissa förhållanden vilket innebär att ett samband inte heller kan uteslutas. Vidare finner studien empiriskt stöd för Tradeoff Theory, däremot kan ingen förklarande modell för kapitalstrukturen säkerställas och därmed inte heller centraliseringsgradens betydelse för kapitalstrukturen. Slutligen har studien även påbörjat en förklarande modell till centraliseringsgraden av finansiering i och med att geografisk spridning visar sig ha positiv påverkan på centraliseringsgraden. / Background: Firms using centralized financing function usually motivates it by it’s value adding property, something today’s research only theoretically touched which indicates that centralized financing can be a value adding strategy. Therefore it exists an interest for an empirical examination. The lack of a measurement for the degree of centralized financing implies that this measurement have to carried out before the theoretical value adding strategy can be empirical tested. Purpose: The study’s purposes is 1) bring forward a measurement for the degree of centralized financing, 2) secure the measurement’s validity and 3) through this measurement test it’s value adding effect to firm value. Method: The first purpose is achieved through an explorative research design where theories close to the subject together with observations of reality were applied. The second purpose is achieved through a smaller statistical study based on financial reports in conjunction with a survey aimed towards experts within the knowledge area. The third purpose is achieved through testing hypotheses in a statistical study on 152 Swedish listed companies. Results and conclusions: The study validates an approximate measure of the degree of centralized financing. The measurement’s connection to firm value can not be established. Although, the degree of centralization has a connection to firm value given certain circumstances which implies that the connection cannot be ruled out either. Further, the study finds empirical support for Tradeoff Theory, however, there are no empirical support for the explanatory model for the capital structure and, by extension, neither for the degree of centralization’s significance on capital structure. Finally, the study has also begun an explanatory model for the degree of centralization of financing since geographical spread has a significant positive effect on the degree of centralization.

O objetivo principal do trabalho é analisar a resposta da estrutura de capital agregada das firmas brasileiras às oscilações de variáveis macroeconômicas. A partir da teoria do “Tradeoff”, o escudo de tributos provenientes da despesa financeira e os custos de falência surgiram como fatores importantes para a determinação da estrutura de capital, que busca maximizar o valor da firma, a partir da incorporação do benefício líquido entre esses fatores ao seu valor. Baseado nesse entendimento e aliado a conclusões de trabalhos recentes sobre a influência de fatores macroeconômicos nessa decisão de estrutura ótima, o trabalho busca entender os efeitos, de oscilações na taxa real de juros, no crescimento do PIB, na taxa real de inflação, na taxa de câmbio, no volume de recursos de bancos de fomento e no mercado de ações, nas decisões sobre financiamento das atividades de empresas no Brasil. Foram encontrados resultados significativos para as todas as variáveis macroeconômicas e, para esses resultados, foram apresentadas interpretações a luz das teorias de estrutura de capital existentes na literatura contemporânea em finanças. / This paper intent to analyze the response of firm’s capital structure to fluctuations at macroeconomic variables, in the Brazilian market. The Tradeoff theory introduced the concept that the balance between the tax shield from financial expenses and bankruptcy costs are relevant factors in the determination of Firm’s capital structure. This theory predicts that firms to maximize its value should incorporate the net benefit between these factors to their value. The paper seeks to understand and measure the impacts of oscillations in interest rate, GDP growth, inflation rate, exchange rate, participation of development banks and stock market fluctuations in the decisions about capital structure. The paper presents significant results for all macroeconomic variables and provide interpretations for these findings, based on the current development of capital structure theories.

<p>In this paper we study the pecking order and tradeoff theories of capital structure on a sample of 121 Swedish, non-financial, listed firms over the period between 2000 - 2009. We find that the Swedish firms’ financing behavior appears to have features consistent with the predictions of both theories. The evidence shows a preference for a financing behavior consistent with the tradeoff theory for the whole sample and for a sample of small firms, whereas large firms appear to follow a pecking order on their financing decisions. We show that under sufficient conditions both theories might be seen as “reconciled” and not mutually exclusive, and we find evidence for the large firms of our sample consistent with this notion.</p>

In this paper we study the pecking order and tradeoff theories of capital structure on a sample of 121 Swedish, non-financial, listed firms over the period between 2000 - 2009. We find that the Swedish firms’ financing behavior appears to have features consistent with the predictions of both theories. The evidence shows a preference for a financing behavior consistent with the tradeoff theory for the whole sample and for a sample of small firms, whereas large firms appear to follow a pecking order on their financing decisions. We show that under sufficient conditions both theories might be seen as “reconciled” and not mutually exclusive, and we find evidence for the large firms of our sample consistent with this notion.

Previous research on the tradeoff between operating and financial leverage has come to contradicting results, thus, there is no consensus of opinion regarding van Horne’s tradeoff theory. This study investigates whether there is support for the tradeoff theory on a sample of 347 Swedish, listed firms. Unlike previous studies, we employ a method with direct measures using guidance provided by Penman (2012), rather than using the more common degree of operating and financial leverage as proxies. During the time period 2006-2011 we find a statistically significant negative relationship of 0.214 using an OLS regression with financial leverage as the dependent variable, giving support for the tradeoff theory. The adjusted explanatory power (adjusted R2) is however rather low, despite adding four control variables, reaching only 7.4%.

O objetivo principal do trabalho é analisar a resposta da estrutura de capital agregada das firmas brasileiras às oscilações de variáveis macroeconômicas. A partir da teoria do “Tradeoff”, o escudo de tributos provenientes da despesa financeira e os custos de falência surgiram como fatores importantes para a determinação da estrutura de capital, que busca maximizar o valor da firma, a partir da incorporação do benefício líquido entre esses fatores ao seu valor. Baseado nesse entendimento e aliado a conclusões de trabalhos recentes sobre a influência de fatores macroeconômicos nessa decisão de estrutura ótima, o trabalho busca entender os efeitos, de oscilações na taxa real de juros, no crescimento do PIB, na taxa real de inflação, na taxa de câmbio, no volume de recursos de bancos de fomento e no mercado de ações, nas decisões sobre financiamento das atividades de empresas no Brasil. Foram encontrados resultados significativos para as todas as variáveis macroeconômicas e, para esses resultados, foram apresentadas interpretações a luz das teorias de estrutura de capital existentes na literatura contemporânea em finanças. / This paper intent to analyze the response of firm’s capital structure to fluctuations at macroeconomic variables, in the Brazilian market. The Tradeoff theory introduced the concept that the balance between the tax shield from financial expenses and bankruptcy costs are relevant factors in the determination of Firm’s capital structure. This theory predicts that firms to maximize its value should incorporate the net benefit between these factors to their value. The paper seeks to understand and measure the impacts of oscillations in interest rate, GDP growth, inflation rate, exchange rate, participation of development banks and stock market fluctuations in the decisions about capital structure. The paper presents significant results for all macroeconomic variables and provide interpretations for these findings, based on the current development of capital structure theories.

O objetivo principal do trabalho é analisar a resposta da estrutura de capital agregada das firmas brasileiras às oscilações de variáveis macroeconômicas. A partir da teoria do “Tradeoff”, o escudo de tributos provenientes da despesa financeira e os custos de falência surgiram como fatores importantes para a determinação da estrutura de capital, que busca maximizar o valor da firma, a partir da incorporação do benefício líquido entre esses fatores ao seu valor. Baseado nesse entendimento e aliado a conclusões de trabalhos recentes sobre a influência de fatores macroeconômicos nessa decisão de estrutura ótima, o trabalho busca entender os efeitos, de oscilações na taxa real de juros, no crescimento do PIB, na taxa real de inflação, na taxa de câmbio, no volume de recursos de bancos de fomento e no mercado de ações, nas decisões sobre financiamento das atividades de empresas no Brasil. Foram encontrados resultados significativos para as todas as variáveis macroeconômicas e, para esses resultados, foram apresentadas interpretações a luz das teorias de estrutura de capital existentes na literatura contemporânea em finanças. / This paper intent to analyze the response of firm’s capital structure to fluctuations at macroeconomic variables, in the Brazilian market. The Tradeoff theory introduced the concept that the balance between the tax shield from financial expenses and bankruptcy costs are relevant factors in the determination of Firm’s capital structure. This theory predicts that firms to maximize its value should incorporate the net benefit between these factors to their value. The paper seeks to understand and measure the impacts of oscillations in interest rate, GDP growth, inflation rate, exchange rate, participation of development banks and stock market fluctuations in the decisions about capital structure. The paper presents significant results for all macroeconomic variables and provide interpretations for these findings, based on the current development of capital structure theories.

Syfte: Undersökningen syftar till att utifrån teorier kring kapitalstruktur och empiriska samband mellan skuldsättning och lönsamhet diskutera hur skuldsättning kan användas i ekonomistyrning. Metod: Undersökningen är gjord enligt kvantitativ forskningsmetod. Sekundärdata hämtas och analyseras med statistiska metoder. Resultaten diskuteras med teoretisk referensram. Slutsats :Studiens empiriska resultat visar på ett signifikant negativt samband mellan skuldsättning (​TSK ​ ) och lönsamhet (​ROA ​ ), samt ett signifikant positivt samband mellan skuldsättning (​TSK ​ ) och lönsamhet (​ROE ​ ). De empiriska resultaten tyder på att hur skuldsättning kan användas i ekonomistyrning beror på hur lönsamhet mäts. / Purpose: This study aims to; from theories of capital structure and empirical relations between debt and profitability discuss how debt can be used in management control. Method: This study follow quantitative research method. Secondary data is retrieved and analyzed by statistical methods. The results are discussed with the theoretical framework. Conclusion: Empirical results indicate a significant negative relationship between debt (​TSK ​ ) and profitability (​ROA ​ ), followed by a significant positive relationship between debt (​TSK ​ ) and profitability (​ROE ​ ). Empirical results further suggest that the measure of profitability is crucial for how debt can be used in management control.