Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Sociais (csociais-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-08T14:02:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Alison_Ribeiro_Centeno_Dis.pdf: 1666560 bytes, checksum: f12e346bb75768cf66ae072aca247600 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-15T17:53:24Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Alison_Ribeiro_Centeno_Dis.pdf: 1666560 bytes, checksum: f12e346bb75768cf66ae072aca247600 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-15T17:55:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Alison_Ribeiro_Centeno_Dis.pdf: 1666560 bytes, checksum: f12e346bb75768cf66ae072aca247600 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-03-20 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Studying the social background, the political careers and political pathways of Federal Senators from Brazil who were chosen as party leaders and supra-party blocs' leaders between 1999 and 2006, this examination points out that during the 51st and 52nd Congresses the group of leaders concentrated and exacerbated the main qualities of the Senate's components. Using a theoretical framework that values institutional political experience and social capital as sources of maintenance of the political elite that composes the political institutions, studies focused on Brazil's bicameral Congress were synthesized in data and conclusions that corroborated for the understanding of the Brazilian political institutions dominated by a cohesive elite, with low circularity and high socioeconomic resources that projects them to the highest positions on Legislative. Questioning the possible dissonance between parties leaders and parties members in the Federal Senate, there was a 'leader profile' that overcame the intrinsic differences of parties on the political spectrum, where Senators that have graduated in engineering overcame the numerical dominance of law graduates in Brazil's Federal Senate, which as one half of the country's Congress is marked by long-serving career politicians, with parties leaders being even more experienced Senators, mainly with political careers built by Legislative mandates. / Atrav?s de um estudo acerca do social background, das carreiras e trajet?rias pol?ticas de Senadores que foram al?ados aos postos de l?deres de partidos e blocos suprapartid?rios do Senado Federal entre 1999 e 2006, este trabalho evidencia que, no que tange ?s 51? e 52? Legislaturas, o col?gio de l?deres concentrou e exacerbou as principais caracter?sticas dos componentes da Casa. Valendo-se de um arcabou?o te?rico que valoriza a experi?ncia pol?tica e o capital social como fontes de manuten??o da elite que comp?e os meios institucionais, retomou-se estudos de caso focados no Congresso Nacional, sintetizados em dados e afirma??es que corroboraram para a compreens?o da pol?tica institucional brasileira dominada por uma elite coesa, de baixa circularidade e de elevados recursos socioecon?micos que os projetam para os cargos mais elevados do Legislativo. Tendo questionado a poss?vel disson?ncia entre os Senadores l?deres e liderados, encontrou-se um perfil de l?der que supera as diferen?as intr?nsecas das legendas na escala ideol?gica, onde os Senadores engenheiros se sobrepuseram a domin?ncia dos bachar?is em Direito na Casa da Federa??o, que como institui??o legislativa marcada pelos pol?ticos de carreiras longevas, tinha no col?gio de l?deres, Senadores ainda mais experientes, principalmente com carreiras pol?ticas constru?das por mandatos no Legislativo.

Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-02-22T19:02:48Z No. of bitstreams: 1 EucastilaJordaniaDeSouzaDiasAnjos_DISSERT.pdf: 1698578 bytes, checksum: 0992b6609358eccaf68381702ed84e37 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-03-06T20:55:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 EucastilaJordaniaDeSouzaDiasAnjos_DISSERT.pdf: 1698578 bytes, checksum: 0992b6609358eccaf68381702ed84e37 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-06T20:55:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 EucastilaJordaniaDeSouzaDiasAnjos_DISSERT.pdf: 1698578 bytes, checksum: 0992b6609358eccaf68381702ed84e37 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-07-18 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico (CNPq) / A pol?tica de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil tem a abordagem territorial como estrat?gia, e estabeleceu h? alguns anos a cria??o de espa?os para participa??o social diversificada, denominados colegiados ou F?runs Territoriais. Nesses espa?os deveriam estar presentes representantes de diversos segmentos da sociedade que comp?em a din?mica pol?tica dos Territ?rios: organiza??es da sociedade civil (ONGs, Sindicatos, Associa??es, Cooperativas, Movimentos Sociais, etc.) e gestores p?blicos (secret?rias municipais e estaduais, autarquias e ?rg?os federais como o MDA). Este trabalho tem como objetivo analisar as influ?ncias e estrat?gias estabelecidas pelos representantes pol?ticos considerados centrais no debate e execu??o de a??es com enfoque Territorial no Mato Grande/RN. Focalizamos as influ?ncias de suas atua??es no campo de discuss?es conformado a partir do espa?o institucionalizado de participa??o, o Colegiado Territorial, estabelecido sob a orienta??o dessa estrat?gia em 2005 enquanto inst?ncia de gest?o e controle social das a??es do Estado. Buscamos tamb?m compreender a partir das trajet?rias desses representantes, mobilizando o conceito de campos (Bourdieu, 1989,2002) como dinamizam, influenciam a organiza??o interna, de pautas e tomada de decis?es nos espa?os para representa??o (Colegiado e N?cleo Diretivo). A partir de observa??es participantes, como tamb?m de entrevistas semi-estruturadas com os agentes considerados centrais, podemos vislumbrar elementos que aproximam essas trajet?rias. Oriundos da Agricultura Familiar, os representantes centrais conseguem exercer o poder simb?lico (Bourdieu, 1989) nesse campo de debates e interesses, compartilham em suas trajet?rias pontos comuns como o tr?nsito entre movimentos sociais e organiza??es de assist?ncia t?cnica, processos que se reproduzem em um contexto de neglig?ncia das gest?es municipais e Estadual com esse debate, fator que condicionaria a reprodu??o de um ambiente de baixa participa??o social em torno da promo??o do desenvolvimento rural, logo das perspectivas trazidas pela abordagem territorial. / The rural development policy in Brazil has the territorial approach as a strategy and established a few years ago the creation of spaces for diverse social participation, called Council or territorial forums. These spaces should be attended by representatives of various segments of society that make up the political dynamics of the territories: civil society organizations (NGOs, trade unions, associations, unions, social movements, etc.) and public managers (municipal and state secretaries, local authorities and agencies federal as MDA). This work aims to analyze the relations between political representatives considered central in the debate and enforcement actions with territorial focus in Mato Grande / RN. Focus on the influence of their actions in the field conformed discussions from the institutionalized space of participation, the Territorial Council, established under the guidance of this strategy in 2005 as the body of management and social control of state actions. We also seek to understand from the trajectories of these representatives and mobilizing the concept of fields (Bourdieu, 1989.2002) as streamline, influence the internal organization, agendas and decision making in representation spaces (Council and Director Center). Building on participants made observations, as well as in semi-structured interviews with agents considered central, can be glimpsed elements that bring these trajectories. Originating Family Agriculture, the central representatives can exercise the symbolic power (Bourdieu, 1989) in the field of debates and interests and have common points in their trajectories as transit through social and service organizations movements. Processes that reproduce in a context of neglect of municipal administrations and state with this debate, a factor that would condition the reproduction of a low social participation environment surrounding the promotion of rural development, then the perspectives brought by the territorial approach.