When it comes to inclusion of social support as a criterion for kidney transplantation, there is lack of standardization and understanding of what it truly means to staff, clinicians, even patients and their families. Despite the variability in what “social support” means to many kidney transplant teams and centers, studies (mostly through survey studies) have shown that inadequate social support serves as an exclusion for patients awaiting kidney transplantation. With inadequate social support serving as an exclusion criterion and without it being properly addressed, inequities currently present in the kidney transplant considerations may be perpetuated. This thesis aims to tangibly define this social support criterion within an urban setting – North Philadelphia. Through REDCap survey administration to practitioners and support staff that handle candidacy for kidney transplantation, we will get a sense of how social support defined by wealth, marriage relationship and parental relationship affect views on the ethics of kidney transplant considerations. Discussions will also be applied to pediatric settings. This thesis will be a commentary on whether the current transplant system fulfills the standards of urban bioethics principles. This will present a framework for social support referrals to be implemented as a necessary resource if a patient on the transplant list presents with inadequate social support. I will argue support of the urban bioethical principles of social justice and solidarity for the purpose of helping healthcare systems, government and insurance understand that such resources should be funded by them to support candidates who truly need it. / Urban Bioethics