Spelling suggestions: "subject:"treering Dating"" "subject:"greenring Dating""
1 |
Statistical methods in dendrochronologyOkasha, Mahmoud Khaled Mohamed January 1987 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Dendrochronological Dating Of Vernacular Folk Crafts In Northern Central JapanHoshino, Yasuharu, Okochi, Takayuki, Mitsutani, Takumi 12 1900 (has links)
We dated vernacular folk crafts (traditional snow shovels) made of beech wood (Fagus crenata
Bl.) in north-central Japan. A raw chronology was constructed for the folk crafts, spanning the period from 1721 to 1953 (233 years). The raw chronology was crossdated using a reference chronology in central Japan. Eventually, tree-ring dates were confidently determined for 26 out of 44 samples. The final tree-ring dates of the folk crafts ranged between 1872 and 1953. We used oral folkloric records collected in a public survey for comparison and verification of our results. The time period of use of the folk crafts was supposed to range between the late Meiji Period and the beginning of the Pacific War (World War II), and the tree-ring dates were generally consistent with the date range. However, the final tree-ring dates were after the Pacific War for two youngest samples, showing better agreement with the historical change in industry of modern Japan. The tree-ring dates demonstrate the potential to describe the historical use of the artifacts more accurately than the folkloric records. In addition, the existing site chronology of Japanese beech has been better replicated using the folk craft samples. The chronology can possibly be further extended using archaeological wood from historical buildings.
|
3 |
Preface: An Introduction To Dendroarchaeology In The Southeastern United StatesGrissino-Mayer, Henri D. 01 1900 (has links)
Dendroarchaeology has a discontinuous history in the Southeastern United States, mostly
because of misconceptions (the Southeast is too mesic), bad sampling practices (no standard protocol exists for preserving prehistoric wood samples), and a lack of reference tree-ring chronologies long enough to date wood from the abundant prehistoric sites. The majority of archaeological applications in recent years has focused on the dating of historic sites and structures to verify the documented year(s) of construction largely in response to requests from historical agencies to verify when a particular structure was built. We have found that most structures are one to two generations younger than their reported date(s) of construction, but most agencies find this information useful as tree-ring dating lends historical credibility to any site. The future of dendroarchaeology in the Southeast is encouraging but many more trained experts are needed to meet the demand of dating historical structures and sites. Furthermore, once a sampling protocol becomes standardized for retrieving wood from prehistoric sites, the potential for absolute dating of these sites is enormous given that abundant wood is archived in locations throughout the Southeast.
|
Page generated in 0.0639 seconds