Spelling suggestions: "subject:"aromakomponent atemsystem."" "subject:"aromakomponent systsystem.""
41 |
Systemic Profiling of Two Component Signaling Networks in Mycobacterium TuberculosisAgrawal, Ruchi January 2015 (has links) (PDF)
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the causative organism of the disease tuberculosis (TB) in humans, leads to nearly two million deaths each year. This versatile pathogen can exist in highly distinct physiological states such as asymptomatic latent TB infection where bacilli lie dormant or as active TB disease in which the bacilli replicate in macrophages. The pathogenic lifestyle requires the tubercle bacillus to sense and respond to multiple environmental cues to ensure its survival. Such stimuli include hypoxia, nutrient limitation, presence of reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen intermediates, pH alterations, and cell wall/ membrane stress. Two component systems (TCSs) form the primary apparatus for sensing and responding to environmental cues in bacteria. A prototypical TCS is composed of a sensory protein called sensor kinase (SK) and a response generating protein called response regulator (RR).
M. tuberculosis encodes 11 genetically paired TCSs, 2 orphan sensor kinases and six orphan response regulator proteins. Studies of the TB bacilli using transcriptional profiling and gene knockouts have revealed that TCSs play an important role in facilitating successful adaptation to diverse environmental conditions encountered within the host. The mtrAB and prrAB genes encoding corresponding TCSs have been shown to be essential for survival, mprAB for persistence and devRS for hypoxic adaptation. Further, inactivation of the TCSs regX3-senX3, tcrXY, trcRS, phoPR or kdpDE was shown to affect the growth and/or virulence of M. tuberculosis in animal infection models.
The SK and RR proteins of TCSs are modular and contain variable input and output domains coupled to conserved ‘transmitter’ and ‘receiver’ domains. Despite the modular nature and extensive homology of SK and RR proteins across TCSs, which may allow non-cognate interactions, it is believed that crosstalk across different TCSs is not favored and that individual pathways are generally well insulated. The existing profiling studies have been performed on the TCSs of bacterial species containing a relatively large number of TCSs. In those studies, specificity and insulation have been the norm and thus become the prevalent paradigm of TCS signaling. In vitro genome wide phosphotransfer profiling has revealed only a few cross- communication nodes in the TCSs of Escherichia coli (~3%), while none in Caulobacter crescentus (in 352 interactions tested, in short time duration) and Myxococcus xanthus (in 250 interactions tested).
Yet, many instances of cross talk have been reported in literature. For example, E. coli TCSs PmrAB and EnvZ-OmpR show cross-communication with QseBC and ArcBA, and many more. In M. tuberculosis, indirect evidence of the existence of such cross regulation has originated from studies where mutations in phoPR have been shown to affect the expression of the TCS devRS and its regulon. It is thus interesting to examine the extent of crosstalk in the TCSs of M. tuberculosis, which has an exceptionally small number of TCS proteins compared to E. coli.
As mentioned earlier, M. tuberculosis H37Rv has 11 cognate pairs of TCSs, 2 orphan sensor kinases and 6 orphan response regulators. To study the entire landscape, we aimed to study all 221 connections between SK and RR proteins including 12 cognate interactions. While 10 of the cognate TCS interactions were established in the literature, two putative systems KdpDE and NarSL and 5 orphan response regulators were still uncharacterized, therefore we initiated our work with the characterization of these TCSs. At the biochemical level, the KdpDE two component system of M. tuberculosis is not well studied, though one report showed interaction of the C-terminal domain of KdpD SK and KdpE RR using yeast two hybrid assay and another reported the interaction of the SK with LRP protein. Besides these associations, there is no evidence for the functionality of KdpDE system. Similarly, NarSL system also has not been characterized and it not known whether these putative two component proteins are functional. The initial part of the study includes the characterization of these two TCSs, NarS-NarL and KdpD-KdpE, at biochemical and physiological levels.
In our studies we demonstrated that KdpDE system is a bonafide two component system of M. tuberculosis, and KdpD SK undergoes autophosphorylation at His642 residue in presence of Mg+2 ions and then it transfers phosphoryl group to a conserved Asp52 residue on the KdpE RR protein. The acid-base stability analysis revealed the nature of chemical bonds present in the KdpD and KdpE proteins, and further confirmed that KdpD and KdpE are typical SK and RR respectively. SPR analysis demonstrated that KdpD and KdpE proteins interact under basal non-phosphorylated conditions and the interaction affinity reduced when SK was phosphorylated. The reduction in the interaction affinity indicated towards a possible dissociation of SK and RR protein during phosphotransfer, which allows RRs to exert their regulatory effect. On the similar line, the phosphorylation defective SK (KdpDH642Q) had least affinity with KdpE suggesting that perhaps this mutant SK, fails to interact with the RR. We have also shown that both the kdpD and kdpE genes are in the same operon and are up regulated in potassium ions limitation and osmotic stress conditions. Overall, using the biochemical approaches, we have established that Rv1027c–Rv1028c operon of M. tuberculosis encodes a functional and a typical KdpDE two component signal transduction system.
Using the similar biochemical and biophysical approaches, we have demonstrated that NarS-NarL proteins constitute a functional TCS and His241 and Asp61 are the phosphorylatable residues. In contrast to KdpDE which shows typical behaviour of TCS, NarSL TCS showed atypical behaviour. Malhotra and group’s work on NarSL suggested that there is cross-regulation between NarS/NarL and DevS/DosT/DevR systems. We addressed this possibility on three separate levels, by examining (i) the cross-phosphorylation of DevR and NarL RRs by non-cognate sensor kinases NarS and DevS/DosT respectively, (ii) the interaction between DevR and NarL RR proteins, and
(iii) examining the effect of DevR-NarL interactions on their DNA binding properties. Our studies ruled out the presence of any physiologically relevant phosphorylation mediated cross-talk between NarS/NarL and DevS/DosT/DevR. We identified that the cross talk between these TCSs could be explained on the basis of interaction between NarL and DevR RRs and their subsequent binding to the target gene promoter regions for concerted regulation of gene expression. We also identified that DevR activation is critical for cooperative action with NarL. This process comes out as a novel mechanism of gene regulation via heteromerization of RRs. We hypothesized that formation of NarL-DevR heteromers may arise because of high sequence similarities. Conclusively, our study provides insights into the functionality of M. tuberculosis NarL/NarS TCS and regulatory function of NarL protein which acts in concert with another RR, DevR. Overall, NarS-NarL system showed an atypical, novel mode of gene regulation involving RR heteromerization.
Subsequent to the basic biochemical characterization of NarSL and KdpDE system, the genome wide phosphotransfer profiling was done to identify the cross-connections between TCSs. Remarkably, we found that specificity was the exception rather than the rule. While only three of the TCS pairs were completely specific, all the other nine TCS pairs exhibited crosstalk, including a few that were highly promiscuous. We classified the interactions as specific, one-to-many, and many-to-one signaling circuits. We also profiled all the RRs including the orphans for their ability to accept phosphoryl group from a low molecular weight donor, acetyl phosphate, and interestingly found that only two RRs DevR and NarL were capable of accepting phosphoryl group from such a donor. Interestingly, none of the orphan RRs accepted phosphoryl group from any donor, neither SKs nor low molecular weight phospho donors, warranting further analysis of their roles and presence in the M. tuberculosis genome. Our exhaustive map of the crosstalk between the TCSs of M. tuberculosis sets the stage for a renewed view of TCS signaling and proposes a dispersive-integrative landscape for TCS signaling rather than one of insulation.
As an extension of our basic characterization work of NarSL TCS, we also attempted to understand the localization pattern of NarS sensor kinase in M. smegmatis cells using fluorescence approaches. It is known that many bacterial receptors including sensor kinases form clusters or show specific localization patterns inside the cell. We found that NarS shows distinct cellular localization pattern. However, the functional significance of this localization pattern is not obvious yet and warrants further investigations. We also developed a few non-radioactive methods to study interaction between two component systems to overcome the limitations associated with radioactive experiments in studying TCSs. We developed fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to study in vitro interaction between two component proteins which was sensitive to the phosphorylation status of the proteins. Using fluorescently tagged SKs and RRs, we determined a change in FRET for KdpDE and NarSL TCS pairs in vitro. Our study thus also provides an alternative approach to study TCS signaling, using an easier, non-radioactive and high throughput approach.
In summary, our study presents the evidence of an alternative paradigm of bacterial signaling, where significant crosstalk between the underlying TCSs prevails. The new paradigm is expected to have important implications in our understanding of the virulence and pathogenesis of bacterial infections. Overall, our studies (i) allowed the establishment of functionality of all paired TCSs encoded in the genome of M. tuberculosis including NarSL and KdpDE TCSs, (ii) identified the novel mechanism of gene regulation by NarL RR and DevR, (iii) demonstrated the existence of TCS signaling which is contrary to the existing notion of specificity (iv) showed the distinct localization pattern of NarS and (v) developed non-radioactive approaches to study two component interactions.
|
42 |
Identification of novel regulatory pathways involved in non-enzymatic resistance to aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Identifications de nouvelles voies de régulation impliquées dans la résistance non enzymatique aux aminosides chez Pseudomonas aeruginosaBolard, Arnaud 05 July 2019 (has links)
Les antibiotiques sont des molécules incontournables dans le traitement des infections bactériennes. L’émergence et la dissémination de la résistance aux antibiotiques chez la pathogène opportuniste Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ont amené l’Organisation Mondiale de la Santé à déclarer indispensable le développement de nouvelles approches thérapeutiques pour lutter contre cette bactérie. Bien que certaines alternatives aient été envisagées, la préservation de l’activité d’antibiotiques majeurs tels que les aminosides et la colistine est primordiale. La caractérisation des mécanismes de résistance à ces médicaments est nécessaire pour la mise au point de nouvelles molécules et mieux prendre en charge les patients. Dans ce contexte, nous montrons que des mutations dans le gène fusA1 (codant le facteur d’élongation EF-G1A) et dans l’opéron pmrAB (système à deux composants PmrAB) entrainent une augmentation de la résistance aux aminosides chez des mutants isolés au laboratoire et des souches issues de patients, atteints ou non, de mucoviscidose. Certaines substitutions d’acide aminé dans EF-G1A accroissent les niveaux de résistance de 2 à 16 fois aux quatre sous-classes d’aminosides. Par ailleurs, des changements d’acide aminé dans le système à deux composants PmrAB activent l’expression des gènes PA4773-PA4774-PA4775, et la production de norspermidine et de spermidine. La synthèse de ces polyamines va de pair avec une baisse de 4 à 16 fois de la sensibilité aux aminosides à noyan 2-désoxystreptamine bisubstitué en 4,6 (gentamicine, amikacine et tobramycine). De plus, il apparaît que la résistance des mutants pmrB à la colistine est en partie dépendante de la pompe d’efflux MexXY(OprM), un système impliqué dans la résistance naturelle, adaptative ou acquise aux aminosides. Enfin, nous montrons que les mutants pmrB surproduisent des alcaloïdes contenant un motif azétidine, par une voie de synthèse non-ribosomale et dépendante du quorum sensing. Ces alcaloïdes diminuent la virulence de P. aeruginosa dans le modèle Galleria mellonella. / Antibiotics are invaluable drugs to combat bacterial infections. Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance in the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa have led the World Health Organization to consider as a crucial priority the development of new therapeutic approaches to fight this bacterium. In addition to other alternatives, preservation of activity of major antibiotics such as aminoglycosides and colistin is primordial. Consequently, characterization of the resistance mechanisms to these drugs is a prerequisite to design novel molecules, and improve patient care. In this context, we show that mutations in gene fusA1 (encoding elongation factor EF-G1A) and in operon pmrAB (two-component system PmrAB) lead to an increased resistance to aminoglycosides in in vitro-selected mutants and strains isolated from cystic fibrosis (CF) and non-CF patients. Certain amino acid substitutions in EF-G1A confer a 2- to 16-fold increased resistance to the four aminoglycoside subclasses. On the other hand, amino acid variations in two-component system PmrAB activate the expression of genes PA4773-PA4774-PA4775, and production of norspermidine and spermidine. This upregulated polyamine biosynthesis is associated with a 4- to 16-fold decreased susceptibility to 4,6-di-substituted deoxystreptamine aminoglycosides (gentamicin, amikacin and tobramycin). Moreover, our work reveals that the acquired resistance of pmrB mutants to colistin partially depends upon pump MexXY(OprM), a system that otherwise mediates intrinsic, adaptive and acquired resistance to aminoglycosides. Finally, we show that pmrB mutants overproduce azetidine-containing alkaloids by a quorum-sensing-regulated, nonribosomal peptide synthetase pathway. These alkaloids impair the virulence of P. aeruginosa in a Galleria mellonella infection model.
|
43 |
Exact Analysis of Exponential Two-Component System Failure DataZhang, Xuan 01 1900 (has links)
<p>A survival distribution is developed for exponential two-component systems that can survive as long as at least one of the two components in the system function. It is assumed that the two components are initially independent and non-identical. If one of the two components fail (repair is impossible), the surviving component is subject to a different failure rate due to the stress caused by the failure of the other.</p> <p>In this paper, we consider such an exponential two-component system failure model when the observed failure time data are (1) complete, (2) Type-I censored, (3) Type-I censored with partial information on component failures, (4) Type-II censored and (5) Type-II censored with partial information on component failures. In these situations, we discuss the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of the parameters by assuming the lifetimes to be exponentially distributed. The exact distributions (whenever possible) of the MLEs of the parameters are then derived by using the conditional moment generating function approach. Construction of confidence intervals for the model parameters are discussed by using the exact conditional distributions (when available), asymptotic distributions, and two parametric bootstrap methods. The performance of these four confidence intervals, in terms of coverage probabilities are then assessed through Monte Carlo simulation studies. Finally, some examples are presented to illustrate all the methods of inference developed here.</p> <p>In the case of Type-I and Type-II censored data, since there are no closed-form expressions for the MLEs, we present an iterative maximum likelihood estimation procedure for the determination of the MLEs of all the model parameters. We also carry out a Monte Carlo simulation study to examine the bias and variance of the MLEs.</p> <p>In the case of Type-II censored data, since the exact distributions of the MLEs depend on the data, we discuss the exact conditional confidence intervals and asymptotic confidence intervals for the unknown parameters by conditioning on the data observed.</p> / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
|
44 |
Regulation of heterologous subtilin production in Bacillus subtilis W168Zhang, Qian, Kobras, Carolin M., Gebhard, Susanne, Mascher, Thorsten, Wolf, Diana 22 April 2024 (has links)
Background: Subtilin is a peptide antibiotic (lantibiotic) natively produced by Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633. It is encoded in a gene cluster spaBTCSIFEGRK (spa-locus) consisting of four transcriptional units: spaS (subtilin pre-peptide), spaBTC (modification and export), spaIFEG (immunity) and spaRK (regulation). Despite the pioneer understanding on subtilin biosynthesis, a robust platform to facilitate subtilin research and improve subtilin production is still a poorly explored spot. Results: In this work, the intact spa-locus was successfully integrated into the chromosome of Bacillus subtilis W168, which is the by far best-characterized Gram-positive model organism with powerful genetics and many advantages in industrial use. Through systematic analysis of spa-promoter activities in B. subtilis W168 wild type and mutant strains, our work demonstrates that subtilin is basally expressed in B. subtilis W168, and the transition state regulator AbrB strongly represses subtilin biosynthesis in a growth phase-dependent manner. The deletion of AbrB remarkably enhanced subtilin gene expression, resulting in comparable yield of bioactive subtilin production as for B. subtilis ATCC6633. However, while in B. subtilis ATCC6633 AbrB regulates subtilin gene expression via SigH, which in turn activates spaRK, AbrB of B. subtilis W168 controls subtilin gene expression in SigH-independent manner, except for the regulation of spaBTC. Furthermore, the work shows that subtilin biosynthesis in B. subtilis W168 is regulated by the two-component regulatory system SpaRK and strictly relies on subtilin itself as inducer to fulfill the autoregulatory circuit. In addition, by incorporating the subtilin-producing system (spa-locus) and subtilin-reporting system (PpsdA-lux) together, we developed “online” reporter strains to efficiently monitor the dynamics of subtilin biosynthesis. Conclusions: Within this study, the model organism B. subtilis W168 was successfully established as a novel platform for subtilin biosynthesis and the underlying regulatory mechanism was comprehensively characterized. This work will not only facilitate genetic (engineering) studies on subtilin, but also pave the way for its industrial production. More
broadly, this work will shed new light on the heterologous production of other lantibiotics.
|
Page generated in 0.0722 seconds