Spelling suggestions: "subject:"ubaid"" "subject:"obaid""
1 |
Architecture and social complexity in the late Ubaid period a study of the built environment of Değirmentepe in East Anatolia /Gurdil, Bekir, January 2004 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--UCLA, 2005. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 425-440).
|
2 |
Terminal Ubaid ceramics at Yenice Yani implications for terminal Ubaid organization of labor and commensality /Kennedy, Jason R. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--State University of New York at Binghamton, Department of Anthropology, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references.
|
3 |
Mineralogy And Production Technology Of Degirmentepe (malatya) PotteryEr, Mehmet Bilgi 01 September 2011 (has links) (PDF)
A series of pottery samples provided from the survey investigations and excavations from Degirmentepe Mound (Malatya), belonging to Chalcolithic (Ubaid), Early Bronze and Iron Ages, were investigated by petrographic and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses to determine their textures, mineralogical compositions and microstructures. The sample microstructures and chemical (semiquantitative) compositions were also studied by scanning electron microscope with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM - EDX). The chemical analyses of some samples were further investigated by inductively coupled plasma &ndash / optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Almost all samples were observed to consist of rock fragments, originating from metamorphic and igneous rocks, although larger grain sizes and higher grain to matrix ratios are recorded for Chalcolithic Age samples compared to those samples belonging to Iron Age. XRD investigations on representative samples of the three periods, revealed high abundances of quartz, feldspar, and pyroxene group minerals in all samples, while the presence of hematite and mica minerals were observed both in Chalcolithic and Iron Age samples, but underlying the use of micaceous raw materials mostly in Iron Age. In the XRD traces of the investigated sherds of Chalcolithic and Iron Ages, the absence of clay fractions both in the bulk and oriented samples, supports a minimum firing temperature of around 800- 850 ° / C, while the presence of mullite phase both in XRD and SEM &ndash / EDX results showed the possible use of high firing temperatures, in the range of 950&ndash / 1050° / C, starting from Chalcolithic Age. Chemical compositions of major oxides obtained ICP &ndash / OES analyses exhibit similar compositions both for Chalcolithic and Iron Age samples. Few exceptions observed may indicate possible use of different raw material and/or different manufacturing technique.
|
4 |
L’architecture en Syro-Mésopotamie et dans le Caucase de la fin du 7e à la fin du 5e millénaire av. J.-C. / Syro-Mesopotamian and Caucasian architecture between the end of the 7th and the end of the 5th millennium B.C.Baudouin, Emmanuel 09 January 2018 (has links)
À partir de la fin du 7e millénaire, l’architecture connaît en Syro-Mésopotamie et dans le Caucase un essor considérable mais selon des rythmes différents. Ce développement différencié est probablement lié aux relations qu’ont entretenues les communautés de ces régions. La teneur de ces relations est probablement multiple. Les échanges techniques sont l’élément primordial pour l’architecture : ils permettent de déterminer si les communautés du Caucase se sont installées de manière autonome au début du 6e millénaire ou si elles ont profité de l’expérience technique de celles de Syro-Mésopotamie, de comprendre l’évolution de l’architecture « complexe » au Samarra et à l’Obeid dès la fin du 7e millénaire et de mesurer l’impact social de l’expansion obeidienne dès la seconde moitié du 6e millénaire. Après une présentation de la méthodologie, où nous définissons les termes employés et la méthode d’analyse, les données archéologiques sont présentées sous la forme synthétique d’une étude typologique selon trois axes : les matériaux de construction, les techniques de mise en œuvre et la morphologie architecturale. Enfin, une analyse croisée des données permet de considérer l’architecture dans une perspective culturelle, géographique et chronologique. Le milieu du 6e millénaire marque un tournant dans les échanges techniques et les relations culturelles entre ces deux régions : auparavant, ces échanges apparaissent diffus dans les régions situées au nord de la Mésopotamie centrale. Ensuite, l’expansion obeidienne entraîne une homogénéisation progressive des techniques dans l’ensemble du bassin syro-mésopotamien, à laquelle se sont greffés emprunts techniques et adaptations régionales. / From the end of the 7th millennium, architecture in Syro-Mesopotamia and Caucasus achieves a major rise but under different rhythms. The content of these relationships is with no doubt numerous. Technical exchanges are the fundamental element when it comes to study architecture: they can help us determine if Caucasus communities settled independently at the beginning of the 6th millennium or if they benefited from the technical experience of the Syro-Mesopomatian communities, understand complex architecture’s evolution during Samarran and Ubaid from the end of the 7th millennium and estimate the social impact of the spread of Ubaid from the second half of the 6th millenium. After a presentation of the methodology used, where we define the terms employed and the analysis method, archeological data are introduced under a typological study developed through three approaches : material, architectural techniques and morphology. Then, a cross analysis of the data can help up consider architecture in a cultural, geographic and chronological perspective. The middle of the 6th millennium represents a turning point into technical exchanges and cultural relationships between these two regions: before that, these exchanges come out as diffuse in the northern regions of the Central Mesopotamia. Then Ubaid expansion leads to a progressive technical homogenisation in all the Syro-Mesopotamian basin, in which borrowed technics and regional adaptations where added.
|
5 |
Recherches sur la période proto-urbaine dans la région du Khabur : exemple : Tell Mashnaqa / Research on the proto-urban period in the region of Khabur : example : Tell MashnaqaBizreh, Hiba 28 November 2015 (has links)
Le terme ‘’proto-urbain’’ proposé par Pascal Butterlin, se réfère à une période s’étendant depuis la fin du 5ème millénaire et jusqu’au 3ème millénaire av. n. è. Durant cette longue période, le site de Mashnaqa sur la moyenne vallée du Khabur, en Syrie, a connu une occupation humaine ininterrompue. Les fouilles de sauvetage dirigées par Dominique Beyer, entre 1992 et 2000 à Mashnaqa, ont livré une longue séquence de l’architecture. L’objectif de cette recherche est de publier les données archéologiques de Mashnaqa durant la période proto-urbaine. Le site a présenté sur cette longue durée quatre niveaux relatifs aux périodes suivantes : Post-Obeid, Uruk Ancien,Uruk Moyen, et Uruk Récent. Ces niveaux sont caractérisés par plusieurs phases architecturales, dont la plupart ont livré des habitats soit complets soit dans un état lacunaire. Le village d’UrukAncien et d’Uruk Moyen a présenté un grand nombre de fours circulaires à cuisine, accompagnés souvent des constructions quadrilatères ou entourés d’un réseau de murs. Ces aménagements posent une question sur le rôle du site à cette époque. La diversité architecturale se présente également par une maison au plan tripartite datant de la période Post-Obeid, et par une construction subcirculaire dont, le modèle, avec les aménagements qui lui sont liés, présente un prototype dans la fin du 4ème millénaire av. n. è. L’évolution de l’espace bâti et le développement céramique sont sans doute les points essentiels dans l’interprétation de la place de Mashnaqa dans la région du Khabur. / The term proto-urban, proposed by Pascal Butterlin, refers to the period extending from the end of the 5th to the 3rd millennium BC. During this long period, the site of Mashnaqa, which is located on the middle valley of Khabur in Syria, was characterized by a continuous occupation. The salvage excavations in Mashnaqa, directed by Dominique Beyer between 1992 and 2000, yielded a long sequence of architecture. The aim of this research is to publish the Mashnaqa archaeological data during the proto-urban period. Four levels which are relative to post-Ubaid, Early Uruk, Middle and Late Uruk were characterized by several architectural phases. Most of these phases yielded some households, either well conserved, or in a deficient state. The village of Late Uruk as well as Middle Uruk is particularly characterized by a remarkable density of circular cooking ovens. These installations were often accompanied to quadrangles structures or they were surrounded by a network of three or four walls. This density of ovens makes us wonder about the real role of the site at this time. The architectural diversity is also presented by the tripartite house, which is dated to the post Ubaid. Moreover, in the late 4th millennium BC, a subcircular building dominated the tell. Its circular type, which is accompanied by a terrace and a rectangular building, presents a prototype during the Late Uruk period.The evolution of the built space and the pottery development are certainly the essential points, which allow to interpret the place of Mashnaqa in the Khabur region.
|
Page generated in 0.0144 seconds