Spelling suggestions: "subject:"anited btates korea"" "subject:"anited btates corea""
1 |
United States' engagement strategy for North Korea /Seiber, Lones B. January 2007 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2007. / "June 2007." Includes bibliographical references (p. 71-76). Also available via the World Wide Web.
|
2 |
Relationship and Perception Between Korea and the United States /Oh, Chang Geon. January 1990 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S. in Management)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 1990. / Thesis Advisor(s): McGonigal, Richard A. Second Reader: Carrick, P. M. "June 1990." DTIC identifier(s): Korea, United States, International relations, Public perceptions, Perception(Psychology), History, Theses. Author(s) subject terms: Korea/U.S. relationship, Korea's Perception. Description based on title page as viewed on October 20, 2009. Includes bibliographical references (p. 157-163). Also available online.
|
3 |
Structural conditions of the world-system and foreign policy-making a study of United States foreign policy toward Korea, 1901-1905 /Kim, Ki-Jung. January 1989 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Connecticut, 1989. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 297-318).
|
4 |
American foreign policy toward Korea, 1945-1950Hong, Hyun Woong. January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Oklahoma State University, 2007. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (p. 256-272).
|
5 |
Korea and the United States a study of the ROK-U.S. security relationship within the conceptual framework of alliances between great and small powers /Paek, Kwang-il, January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--George Washington University, 1981. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 195-206).
|
6 |
The outcomes of trade conflicts and negotiations between the United States and South Korea, 1980-2000Kim, Hak-Do. January 1900 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Southern California, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 230-243).
|
7 |
Extended deterrence in Korea the U.S. defense commitment to South Korea /Roehrig, Terence Jerome. January 1995 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1995. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 340-352).
|
8 |
The president and international security Korea, containment, and change /Kim, Ilsu. January 1998 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Miami University, 1998. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 232-258).
|
9 |
The future of the U.S. - R.O.K. military relationshipKim, Chŏng-ik January 1994 (has links)
Since the end of the Second World War the security of South Korea has been dependent on the actions of the United States, whose chief interest was to block communist expansion in the free world. Throughout the Cold War the U.S. was interested in defending South Korea from communist attack and by doing so to maintain stability in Northeast Asia. The close military relationship between the two countries was a direct result of this strategic consideration. With the end of the Cold War, the strategic and military commitments of the United States have changed and thanks to the economic downturn, the United States has tried to cut defense expenditure. Without an apparent enemy, the U.S. post-Cold War strategy now focuses on keeping a peaceful world, favorable to the United States by preventing regional conflicts and promoting human rights. As expected, the number of soldiers in forward bases throughout the world, including South Korea, has been reduced. But for North Korean nuclear development, the force withdrawal program declared by the Bush administration would have been executed as scheduled, forcing South Korea to take a leading role in defending the country by the end of this century. A conventional war in the Korean Peninsula will not seriously affect the strategic interests of the United States in Asia as long as the security of Japan is not threatened. The South Korean military might be able to stall the invasion of North Korea for some time until the international community responded. The United States no longer needs to sacrifice American lives by being directly involved in a military conflict in Korea. If this was the case, the scene would be more clear in which South Korea will be forced to take a leading role and allow the majority of U.S. forces in Korea to leave.
|
10 |
Korea-U.S. trade negotiation on market access : dispute over the Korean shelf-life regulations for food productsKim, Kee Deok January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
Page generated in 0.3004 seconds