Thesis (M.A. in National Security Affairs )--Naval Postgraduate School, September 2007. / Thesis Advisor(s): Lonney, Robert. "September 2007." Description based on title screen as viewed on October 19, 2007. AD-A473 711. Includes bibliographical references (p. 79-83). Also available via the World Wide Web.

Thesis (M.A.)--Naval Postgraduate School, 2002. / Thesis advisor(s): Glenn Robinson, Jeanne Giraldo. Includes bibliographical references (p. 57-62). Also available online.

This thesis examines the impact of the New World Order on the Arab-Israeli peace process. It argues that, since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the old bipolar World Order has disappeared and a new unipolar one has emerged. The United States of America, as the only remaining single superpower, has enjoyed a great degree of influence and a kind of hegemony in international affairs. Its military superiority and economic, technological and diplomatic strength, in the absence of any competing power, have given it the upper hand to pursue its own policies and its own interests. This American unipolarity and hegemony are clearly demonstrated in the Middle East peace process. The United States' unipolarity on the international level and its hegemony on the regional level have allowed it to pursue policies to resolve the Arab- Israeli conflict. Regional states, released from the constraints or protection of the patron- client relationships fostered under the bi-polar Old World Order, have adjusted their own policies to take into account this New World Order. A neo-realist understanding of this has been developed which assesses this process in terms of international and regional balance of power and "rules of the game”. This method had been used to understand the reasons for and nature of the Arab- Israeli peace negotiations that started at Madrid in 1991 and developed in Oslo in 1993. The thesis argues that these negotiations were in fact a single process which was the direct result of this American-led New World Order. Whether through direct or indirect American involvement or through the indirect or direct acknowledgement by regional actors of the nature of the New World Order, American interests and preferences have been strongly reflected in the peace process.

Thesis (M.S. in Joint Campaign Planning and Strategy)--Joint Forces Staff College, Joint Advanced Warfighting School, 2007. / Vita. "National Defense Univ Norfolk VA"--DTIC cover. "15 May 2007." Includes bibliographical references (p. 78-83). Also available via the Internet.

Proefschrift--Utrecht. / "Stellingen" ([4])p.) and corrigenda slip inserted. Bibliography: p. [117]-118. Bibliographical footnotes.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Canterbury, 2009. / "Department of History University of Canterbury" Typescript (photocopy). Includes bibliographical references (leaves 171-216). Also available via the World Wide Web.

Thesis (M.A.)--Central Connecticut State University, 2000. / Thesis advisor: Norton Mezvinsky. " ... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts [in History]." Includes bibliographical references (leaves i-viii).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Northern Illinois University, 1995. / Dept. of History. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves [393]-409).

Thesis (M.A.)--University of North Texas, Aug., 2009. / Title from title page display. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (MA)--University of Montana, 2009. / Contents viewed on December 4, 2009. Title from author supplied metadata. Includes bibliographical references.