Spelling suggestions: "subject:"utrikestjänsten"" "subject:"hyrestjänsten""
1 |
Hur har EU:s tolkning av rysk desinformation som ett hot förändrats? : En diskursanalys av EU:s policydokument / How has the EU Interpretation of Russian Disinformation as a Threat Changed? : A Discourse Analysis on EU’s Policy Documents 2015-2021Nori, Jennifer January 2022 (has links)
In the recent years, disinformation as a hybrid warfare has gotten more attention on the international arena between state actors. Hybrid warfare comes in different forms and categorizes combinations of military and non military methods of attacking through cyber attacks, economic pressure, use of regular forces and deployment of irregular armed groups. But there is an invisible weapon which state actors tend to use even more in the last few years, causing conflict, threats and war through hidden shadows. Disinformation has been used since the times of the KGB and furthermore in different political and global events throughout the years. The state actor that stands out on this security agenda, Russia, has been identified as a threat to the European Union through an extensive misleading information that has been spread all over the world with an agenda of undermining the EU. Therefore, has the European Union identified Russia as a security threat in the official published policy documents. The aim of this study is to examine how the EU’s discourse has changed regarding disinformation as a threat from a state actor such as Russia. A discourse analysis has been applied on this essay and the method of choice is Carol Bacchis: What’s the problem represented to be? The chosen theory in this study- securitization, means that in a securitization process a problem first develops from being apolitical, to then politicized and finally securitized.In order to achieve and answer the research question a following of six policy documents from different time periods has been examined from the European Union. Finally, the results of this study shows how the discourse in EU regarding disinformation has changed throughout the years with EU first and foremost not naming a state actor that spreads misleading information, to later accepting that as a threat, and lastly identifying the state actor as a security threat and showcasing strategies and measures in official policy documents.
|
2 |
EU:s Utrikespolitik? : En studie om skillnaden mellan policynivå och praktiken i EU:s utrikespolitik utifrån perspektiven mänskliga rättigheter, feminism och globalisering. / European Union's Foreign Policy? : A study about the difference between the policy and the reality in the EU:s foreign policy, with the perspectives Human rights, Feminism and Globalization.Beijerstam Torstensson, Cajsa January 2019 (has links)
The purpose of this study is to examine how the European Union's foreign policy demonstrates the theories human rights, feminism and globalization. This will be examined in how the theories are demonstrated in the foreign policy and also how there is a difference between how it is portrayed in the policy and how it is shown in reality. The primarily source of this study is a document that describes the European Union's foreign policy through a global strategy. The global strategy will be analyzed through how it encourages the different theories in their policy. The study will then continue to examine how the difference between the policy and the reality becomes more concrete through the global strategy and different events on both an intern and an extern level. The results show that there is a large difference between the European Union's foreign policy and the reality.
|
Page generated in 0.0664 seconds