Background: The prevalence of herpes zoster (HZ) is high in patients with rheumatic diseases. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) doubles the risk for developing HZ. However, little is known about natural humoral immunity against varicella zoster virus (VZV) in patients with SLE. Hence, we compared VZV IgG antibody concentrations in a group of SLE patients with healthy controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: n = 56 patients with SLE, n = 54 patients with RA, and n = 56 healthy controls were included in this study. The VZV IgG antibody concentration was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The antibody concentrations were compared between the groups. Results: Overall IgG antibody titers for VZV in SLE patients were comparable to healthy controls but higher when compared to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.0012). In consequence, antibody levels in controls were higher than in RA patients (p = 0.0097). Stratification by age revealed highest titers among SLE patients in the fourth life decade (p = 0.03 for controls, p = 0.0008 for RA patients) whereas RA patients in their sixth decade had the lowest antibody concentration (p = 0.03 for controls, p = 0.04 for SLE patients). Regarding the individual HZ history, antibody levels of SLE patients with a positive history exceeded all other groups. Conclusions: Although humoral VZV immunity in SLE patients is comparable to healthy controls it seems to be pronounced in young SLE patients between 30 and 39. The lowest VZV IgG levels were found in RA patients. HZ seems to induce antibody production, particularly in patients with SLE. Immunological processes might contribute to VZV antibody levels in SLE patients, but further investigations are needed to substantiate this hypothesis. Even though the increased HZ prevalence seems to be independent of humoral immunity in SLE patients, reduced humoral immunity might contribute to HZ in RA patients. The available HZ subunit vaccination might be an appropriate way to reduce the HZ risk in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Das human pathogene Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV) gehört zur Familie der Herpesviren und ist weltweit verbreitet. Die Primärinfektion verursacht Varicellen, welche durch einen bläschenartigen Hautausschlag charakterisiert ist. Im Anschluss daran etabliert VZV eine lebenslange Latenz und verursacht nach Reaktivierung Herpes Zoster. Seit 2004 ist der Lebendimpfstoff aus attenuierten Virionen des VZV-Stammes V-Oka in Deutschland empfohlen. Im Gegensatz zur Infektion mit zirkulierenden virulenten VZV Stämmen tritt nach Verimpfung des Vakzin-Stammes V-Oka kein Exanthem auf. Die Haut ist der Hauptreplikationsort von VZV und immunologische Unterschiede zwischen virulentem VZV und dem Vakzin-Stamm treten hier am deutlichsten auf. In der vorliegenden Arbeit konnte eine neue Immunevasionsstrategie virulenter VZV Stämme aufgedeckt werden, welche erklären könnte, wie virulente VZV Stämme frühe antivirale Immunantworten umgehen. In Hautläsionen von Herpes Zoster Patienten konnte eine massive Infiltration von myeloiden inflammatorischen Dendritischen Zellen beobachtet werden. In vitro Studien mit Monozyten abgeleiteten Dendritischen Zellen (DC), welche inflammatorische DC repräsentieren, zeigten, eine signifikant erhöhte Expression von CD1c Molekülen nach Infektion mit dem Vakzin-Stamm, sowie virulentem VZV. Funktionelle Untersuchungen mit intraepithelialen CD1c-restringierten gamma delta T Zellen zeigten, dass DC nach Infektion mit dem Vakzin-Stamm phänotypisch und funktionell reiften und somit die T Zellen zur IFN-gamma Sekretion stimulierten. Im Gegensatz dazu wurde die funktionelle Reifung von DC, die mit virulentem VZV infiziert waren, geblockt. Folglich wurde kein bioaktives IL-12 sezerniert, welches als entscheidendes Cytokin zum Aufbau einer antiviralen T-Helfer 1 Immunantwort beiträgt. Darüber hinaus konnte gezeigt werden, dass virulentes VZV die Signalkaskade des Toll-like Rezeptors 2 (TLR2) in DC inhibiert und somit die IL-12 Produktion verhindert. / Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) which belongs to the family of herpesviruses is restricted to humans and distributed worldwide. Primary infection of VZV causes chickenpox characterized by a disseminated rash. Thereafter, VZV establishes a lifelong latency and can be reactivated to cause herpes zoster. Since 2004 the attenuated strain V-Oka of VZV was licensed for Germany to immunize children against VZV infection. In contrast to infection by circulating virulent VZV strains, vaccination with V-Oka remains asymptomatic. The skin is the major replication site of VZV and immunological differences between virulent VZV and the vaccine should become most apparent within this immune organ. In summary, this study discovered a new immune evasion strategy of virulent VZV strains which might explain how virulent VZV strains overcome innate antiviral responses. A strong infiltration of myeloid-derived inflammatory DCs has been detected in skin lesions of herpes zoster patients. In vitro studies with monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs), reflecting inflammatory DCs, showed that they were efficiently infected by both, the vaccine and a virulent VZV strain. Intriguingly, a significant upregulation of CD1c molecules on VZV-infected DCs was observed. Functional investigations using intraepithelial CD1c-restricted gamma delta T cells revealed that DCs infected with the vaccine virus were fully instructed to mature, thereby promoting IFN-gamma secretion of gamma-delta T cells. In striking contrast, DCs infected with virulent VZV strains were efficiently blocked to mature functionally. In detail, they did not secrete bioactive IL-12 which is an instrumental cytokine for generation of antiviral T helper 1 responses. Moreover, virulent VZV blocked Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) signaling in DCs thereby preventing production of bioactive IL-12 which in turn inhibited IFN-gamma secretion by gamma-delta T cells.

Les infections virales en particulier celles dues aux virus de la famille des Herpesviridae pendant la période d’aplasie et de lymphopénie à la suite d’une greffe de cellules souches hématopoïétiques (GCSH) peuvent occasionner des complications très graves, souvent associées à une morbidité et mortalité élevées. Les recommandations cliniques actuelles préconisent l’utilisation des antiviraux pour la prévention de certaines de ces infections. L’efficacité du famciclovir et de l’acyclovir contre les virus de l’herpès simplex (HSV), le virus varicella-zoster (VZV) et l’herpésvirus humain de type 6 (HHV-6) est bien reconnue, cependant il nous manque des données quant à leur effet contre le virus Epstein-Barr (EBV) et le cytomégalovirus (CMV) dans la population pédiatrique. L’objectif principal de ce projet de maitrise a été de mesurer l’incidence de l’infection aux virus HSV, VZV, EBV, CMV et HHV-6 et de mesurer l’association entre l’utilisation de la prophylaxie antivirale (acyclovir et famciclovir) et l’infection (virémie asymptomatique et maladie) avec le CMV et l’EBV dans une cohorte pédiatrique de GCSH allogéniques. Les données d'une cohorte de sujets ayant subis pour la première fois une GCSH enrôlés dans quatre centres de greffes pédiatriques au Canada entre juillet 2013 et mars 2017 (Étude TREASuRE) ont été utilisées. Le recrutement a été effectué au : CHU Sainte-Justine (Montréal) (n=86), British Columbia Children’s Hospital (Vancouver) (n=31), Winnipeg Children's Hospital and CancerCare Manitoba (n=28) et Alberta Children’s Hospital (n=11). Le suivi des patients avait débuté 1 mois avant la greffe et avait duré 13 mois. L’âge médian des patients au recrutement était de 6,3 ans. Les courbes de Kaplan-Meier ont permis d’estimer l'incidence cumulée des infections CMV et EBV avec intervalle de confiance (IC) à 95% à 100 jours post-greffe en fonction de la prophylaxie antivirale (acyclovir ou famciclovir). Les modèles multivariés de régression de Cox à risques proportionnels ont permis de mesurer l'association entre la prise d’antiviraux (acyclovir ou famciclovir) et le développement de ces infections. L’étude a inclus 156 sujets âgés de 0 à 21 ans. Les incidences cumulées de la virémie des virus de HSV, VZV, EBV, CMV et HHV-6 à 100 jours de suivi ont été respectivement de 2.5% (IC 95% : 0.8–7.6), 0.8% (IC 95% : 0.1–6.1), 34.5% (IC 95% : 27.6–42.6), 19.9% (IC 95% : 14.5-27.1) et 3.4% (IC 95% : 1.2–9.1). Les incidences cumulées pour CMV et EBV n’ont pas montré de différence statistiquement significative entre les groupes ayant reçu la prophylaxie antivirale (acyclovir ou famciclovir) et ceux qui ne l’ont pas reçu. Les analyses de Cox n’ont montré aucun effet significatif des antiviraux sur le CMV avec un HR ajusté de 0.55 (IC 95% : 0.24–1.26) pour l’acyclovir et de 0.82 (IC 95% : 0.30–2.29) pour le famciclovir. Il en était de même pour l’EBV avec un HR ajusté de 1.41 (IC 95% : 0.63–3.14) pour l’acyclovir et de 0.79 (IC 95% : 0.36–1.72) pour le famciclovir. Notre étude n’a montré aucune preuve d’effet de la prophylaxie antivirale avec le famciclovir et l’acyclovir contre l’EBV et le CMV. Très peu de cas de HSV et de VZV ont été diagnostiqués dans cette cohorte ce qui est conforme avec l’idée selon laquelle l’acyclovir et le famciclovir sont efficaces pour ces virus. / Viral infections, especially those involving members of the Herpesviridae during the period of aplasia and lymphopenia following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), cause very serious complications, often associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current clinical guidelines recommend prophylactic use of antivirals, which has proven to be effective against certain viruses. The efficacy of famciclovir and acyclovir against herpes simplex viruses (HSV), varicella zoster virus (VZV) and human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) is well-recognized, however, we lack data on their effects against Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the pediatric population. The main objective of this master's project was to measure the incidence of herpes virus infection, specifically by HSV, VZV, EBV, CMV and HHV-6, and to measure the association between the use of antiviral prophylaxis (acyclovir and famciclovir) and infection (including both asymptomatic viremia and disease) by CMV and EBV in a pediatric cohort of allogeneic HSCT. We used data from the TREASuRE cohort, which includes patients enrolled for a first allogeneic HSCT in four pediatric centers in Canada between July 2013 and March 2017. Recruitment was carried out at: CHU Sainte-Justine (Montreal) (n = 86), British Columbia Children's Hospital (Vancouver) (n = 31), Winnipeg Children's Hospital and CancerCare Manitoba (n = 28) and Alberta Children's Hospital (n = 11). Patient follow-up began 1 month before transplant and lasted 13 months. Median patient age at recruitment was 6.3 years. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of CMV and EBV infections with 95% confidence interval (CI) at 100 days post-transplant according to antiviral prophylaxis (acyclovir or famciclovir). Multivariate proportional hazards Cox regression models were used to measure the association between antiviral use (acyclovir or famciclovir) and the detection of these infections. The study included 156 subjects aged 0 to 21 years. The cumulative incidences of viremia due to HSV, VZV, EBV, CMV and HHV-6 at day 100 of follow-up were respectively 2.5% (CI 95%: 0.8–7.6), 0.8% (CI 95%: 0.1-6.1), 34.5% (CI 95%: 27.6-42.6), 19.9% (CI 95%: 14.5-27.1) and 3.4% (95% CI: 1.2-9.1). The cumulative incidences for CMV and EBV did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups who received antiviral prophylaxis (acyclovir or famciclovir) and those who did not. Cox analyses showed no significant effect of antivirals on CMV with an adjusted HR of 0.55 (95% CI: 0.24–1.26) for acyclovir and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.30–2.29) for famciclovir. The same was true for EBV with an adjusted HR of 1.41 (95% CI: 0.63–3.14) for acyclovir and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.36–1.72) for famciclovir. Our study showed no evidence of an effect with use of famciclovir or acyclovir prophylaxis on EBV and CMV infections. Very few cases of HSV and VZV infections were diagnosed in this cohort, which is consistent with the idea that acyclovir and famciclovir are effective against the latter viruses.