Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2017-06-01T18:06:32Z No. of bitstreams: 1 mileneperesguersonmedeirosschuery.pdf: 1480531 bytes, checksum: 24cffd70f493aee44aa11c4efd0aed29 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-06-02T15:59:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 mileneperesguersonmedeirosschuery.pdf: 1480531 bytes, checksum: 24cffd70f493aee44aa11c4efd0aed29 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2017-06-02T16:00:51Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 mileneperesguersonmedeirosschuery.pdf: 1480531 bytes, checksum: 24cffd70f493aee44aa11c4efd0aed29 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-02T16:00:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 mileneperesguersonmedeirosschuery.pdf: 1480531 bytes, checksum: 24cffd70f493aee44aa11c4efd0aed29 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-06-07 / O desenvolvimento de novas tecnologias a partir do século XX acarretaram profundas modificações no processamento de informações na sociedade. Esse progresso tecnológico alcançou o Poder Judiciário com o uso cada vez mais crescente das mídias visuais como meio de prova e persuasão. Essa dissertação dá enfoque em especial para a prova em vídeo em razão de seu alto poder de persuasão, e discute se os operadores do Direito estariam capacitados para lidar com esse tipo de prova visual, quando tradicionalmente estão mais familiarizados com a prova escrita. A principal problemática, no entanto, diz respeito a aptidão da prova em vídeo para atingir o standard probatório utilizado nos casos criminais, qual seja, o standard da prova além da dúvida razoável. / The development of new technologies from the twentieth century led to profound changes in information processing in society. This technological progress reached Judiciary growing with the increased use of visual media as a form of evidence and persuasion. This dissertation specially focuses on video evidence due to its high power of persuasion, and discusses whether jurists would be qualified to handle this kind of visual evidence, when traditionally are more familiar with the written evidence. The main problem, however, concerns the ability of video evidence to meet the standard of proof used in criminal cases, that is, the standard of proof beyond all reasonable doubt.

視訊資料於現今社會下於生活中廣泛被使用，從專門用於拍攝影片的V8、DV，到結合攝影功能的數位相機，更甚至於最近的手機、平版電腦，其之影片拍攝之功能，更成為其之基本配備。是以，視訊資料做為證據使用，亦隨之成為普遍，視訊證據於刑事審判程序如何被使用，將有討論的必要。 除說明本文之研究動機、研究目的、研究方法及範圍外，本文依序探討視訊資料之發展以及視訊證據之概念與優缺點，並藉由介紹美國學者對於視訊證據之分類，以建立視訊證據之討論基礎。接著，討論視訊證據於美國刑事審判程序之調查規範與適用，並分析視訊證據於美國刑事審判程序調查時所可能發生之問題，探究美國刑事審判實務相應之解決方案。最後，比較與我國刑事審判實務上對於視訊證據調查之差異，以供我國刑事審判實務之借鏡外，亦藉此分析視訊證據於我國刑事審判程序調查時所可能發生之問題，並尋求相應之解決方案。 / Video evidence is extensively used nowadays. From the use of professional motion-filming video 8 mm and digital video to digital cameras with filming function, as well as cell phones and tablet personal computers, the function of motion-filming has recently become essential and indispensable. Therefore, video evidence treated as evidence is progressively common, and it is necessary to discuss how video evidence is used in criminal trial procedure. In addition to elaborating the observation motive, purpose, method and scope of this thesis, the progress of video materials as well as the concept and odds and ends of video evidence will be sequentially discussed. Furthermore, the discussion ground for video evidence will be built by means of introducing the classification of video evidence from scholars in the U.S. To continue, there will be a focus on the discussion of the investigation rules and application of video evidence in the U.S. criminal trial procedure, and then analyze the possible questions which may arise while using video evidence in criminal trial procedure in the U.S. as well as explore the corresponding solutions used in the U.S. In conclusion, the U.S. will be used as a reference model by comparing the divergences of the investigation process in video evidence between our country and the U.S. In the meantime, the probable questions that we might confront while investigating video evidence in criminal trial procedure will be assayed, and afterwards, the corresponding solutions will be searched for.

Submitted by Geandra Rodrigues (geandrar@gmail.com) on 2018-04-26T12:44:20Z No. of bitstreams: 1 andrelazaroferreiraaugusto.pdf: 1688273 bytes, checksum: af3a162669195b1697feca7d038ed872 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2018-05-09T12:18:10Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 andrelazaroferreiraaugusto.pdf: 1688273 bytes, checksum: af3a162669195b1697feca7d038ed872 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2018-05-09T12:18:29Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 andrelazaroferreiraaugusto.pdf: 1688273 bytes, checksum: af3a162669195b1697feca7d038ed872 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-09T12:18:29Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 andrelazaroferreiraaugusto.pdf: 1688273 bytes, checksum: af3a162669195b1697feca7d038ed872 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-02-20 / Este trabalho tem como objetivo verificar se a recomendação de Kahan (2009), Sherwin (2011) e Silbey (2008) à alfabetização visual dos profissionais do Direito para a interpretação e a valoração da prova em vídeo é pertinente ao caso brasileiro. Para tanto, buscou-se analisar a argumentação do Promotor de Justiça, do Defensor Público, da Juíza-Auditora e do Ministro Relator do recurso de apelação em um processo criminal militar que tramitou na Auditoria de Juiz de Fora/MG. Tal análise teve como norte estudos de Silbey (2004) e referencial teórico da Linguística Textual, em especial Koch (1986, 2011, 2015) e Thompson e Hunston (2000). Inicialmente, realizou-se a revisão de literatura sobre o tema. Após, através do método do estudo de caso unitário e com suporte na análise qualitativa de dados, investigaram-se os recursos linguísticos argumentativos e o direcionamento da força argumentativa empregados. Assim, verificou-se o tratamento dispensado à prova em vídeo no que tange à sua admissão e valoração, influenciados pela natureza com que foi considerada (demonstrativa ou substantiva), a incidência da teoria da testemunha silenciosa na atividade interpretativa e a aptidão desses atores processuais em lidar com essa prova em formato audiovisual. Ao final, após a constatação da procedência da recomendação de Kahan, Sherwin e Silbey no âmbito pátrio, sugeriu-se a realização de novos estudos para auxiliar na atividade de interpretação do registro audiovisual. Tais estudos englobariam a análise da estrutura argumentativa presente na fala dos participantes, a investigação das marcas linguístico-discursivas existentes nessas falas e a transcrição multimodal da prova em vídeo de acordo com as convenções da Análise da Conversa Etnometodológica. / This paper aims to verify if the recommendation of Kahan (2009), Sherwin (2011) and Silbey (2008) to the visual literacy of law professionals for the interpretation and assessment of video evidence is pertinent to the Brazilian case. Hence, were analyzed the arguments of the Public Prosecutor, the Public Defender, the Military Judge and the Military Minister rapporteur for the appeal in a military criminal case that was processed in Juiz de Fora/MG’s court. This analysis was based on studies by Silbey (2004) and theoretical reference of Textual Linguistics, especially Koch (1986, 2011, 2015) and Thompson and Hunston (2000). Initially, the literature review on the subject was carried out. Afterwards, through the method of the unitary case study and with support in the qualitative analysis of data, were investigated the argumentative linguistic resources and the direction of the argumentative strength employed. Thus, it was verified the treatment of video evidence regarding admission and valuation, influenced by the nature with which it was considered (demonstrative or substantive), the incidence of the silent witness theory in the interpretive activity and the suitability of these procedural actors in dealing with this evidence in audiovisual format. In the end, after the verification of the recommendation of Kahan, Sherwin and Silbey at the country level, it was suggested to carry out new studies to assist in the audiovisual record interpretation activity. These studies could encompass the analysis of the argumentative structure present in the participants' speech, the investigation of the linguistic-discursive marks in these lines and the multimodal transcription of the video test according to the conventions of the Ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis.