Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-12-15T16:54:45Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CesarAugustoNardelliCostaDissertacao2017.pdf: 1666561 bytes, checksum: dfc90fd372bc3587e415a44daea0e219 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-12-15T16:54:59Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CesarAugustoNardelliCostaDissertacao2017.pdf: 1666561 bytes, checksum: dfc90fd372bc3587e415a44daea0e219 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-15T16:54:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CesarAugustoNardelliCostaDissertacao2017.pdf: 1666561 bytes, checksum: dfc90fd372bc3587e415a44daea0e219 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-24 / The objective of this study is to present the possibilities of jurisdictional intervention in the public budget, especially regarding the discussion, about the contribution of the Public Prosecution Service to the realization of fundamental rights through the judicial intervention in the public finances. The theme is part of the public budget problem in Brazil - object of theoretical revision in recent years, in the face of the progressive constitutionalization of the presuppositions of its understanding, in what can be called Due Budget Process. In this perspective, the finances of the State should reflect the priority public constitutional policies and the optimization of the administrative activity, as well as the result of a wide democratic discussion. In addition, it is necessary to discuss the binding effectiveness of budget laws in the period of their validity, which requires valid reasoning for hypotheses of change or contingency. Legitimate alternatives are presented that allow the success of judicial intervention in Public Finance when there is a flagrant violation of the legal order. In addition, the extrajudicial action of the Public Prosecutor's Office allows the resolution of constitutional conflicts with more speed and effectiveness. On the other hand, repressive action and judicial correction are indispensable tools for guaranteeing the community in all cases where preventive action is not successful. The work was developed through bibliographical and documentary research, being consulted publications referring to doctrine and jurisprudential documents. / O objetivo deste estudo ?? apresentar as possibilidades de interven????o jurisdicional no or??amento estatal, especialmente no que toca ?? contribui????o do Minist??rio P??blico para a efetiva????o de direitos fundamentais, por meio da interven????o jurisdicional nas finan??as p??blicas. O tema se insere na problem??tica sobre or??amento p??blico no Brasil, mat??ria objeto de revis??o te??rica nos ??ltimos anos, em face da progressiva constitucionaliza????o dos pressupostos de sua compreens??o, no que pode ser denominado Devido Processo Or??ament??rio. As finan??as do Estado devem refletir as pol??ticas p??blicas constitucionais priorit??rias e a otimiza????o da atividade administrativa, bem como o resultado de uma ampla discuss??o democr??tica. Al??m disso, ?? preciso debater, ainda, a efic??cia vinculante das leis or??ament??rias no per??odo de sua vig??ncia, o que exige fundamenta????o v??lida para hip??teses de altera????o ou de contingenciamento. S??o apresentadas alternativas leg??timas que possibilitem o ??xito da interven????o jurisdicional nas finan??as p??blicas quando se constatar flagrante viola????o da ordem jur??dica. Ademais, a atua????o extrajudicial do Minist??rio P??blico permite a resolu????o de conflitos constitucionais com mais celeridade e efetividade. Por outro lado, a atua????o repressiva e a corre????o judicial s??o instrumentos indispens??veis para a garantia da coletividade em todas as hip??teses que a a????o preventiva n??o tiver ??xito. O trabalho foi desenvolvido por meio de pesquisa bibliogr??fica e documental, sendo consultadas publica????es referentes ?? doutrina e documentos jurisprudenciais.