Primate lentiviruses encode four “accessory proteins” including Vif, Vpu, Nef, and Vpr/ Vpx. Vif and Vpu counteract the antiviral effects of cellular restrictions to early and late steps in the viral replication cycle. The functions of Vpx/ Vpr are not well understood. This study presents evidence that the Vpx proteins of HIV-2/ SIVSMpromote HIV-1 infection by antagonizing an antiviral restriction in myeloid cells. Fusion of macrophages in which Vpx was essential for virus infection, with COS cells in which Vpx was dispensable for virus infection, generated heterokaryons that supported infection by wild-type SIV but not Vpx-deleted SIV. The restriction potently antagonized infection of macrophages by HIV-1, and expression of Vpx in macrophages in transovercame the restriction to HIV-1 and SIV infection. Similarly, the cellular restriction is the obstacle to transduction of macrophages by MLV. Neutralization of the restriction by Vpx rendered macrophages permissive to MLV infection. Vpx was ubiquitylated and both ubiquitylation and the proteasome regulated the activity of Vpx. The ability of Vpx to counteract the restriction to HIV-1 and SIV infection was dependent upon the HIV-1 Vpr interacting protein, damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1), and DDB1 partially substituted for Vpx when fused to Vpr. This study further demonstrates that this restriction prevents transduction of quiescent monocytes by HIV-1. Although terminally differentiated macrophages are partially permissive to HIV-1, quiescent monocytes, which are macrophage precursors, are highly refractory to lentiviral infection. Monocyte-HeLa heterokaryons were resistant to HIV-1 infection, while heterokaryons formed between monocytes and HeLa cells expressing Vpx were permissive to HIV-1 infection, suggesting the resistance of quiescent monocytes to HIV-1 transduction is governed by a restriction factor. Encapsidation of Vpx within HIV-1 virions conferred the ability to infect quiescent monocytes. Introduction of Vpx into monocytes by pre-infection also rendered quiescent monocytes permissive to HIV-1 infection. Infection of monocytes by HIV-1 either with or without Vpx did not have an effect on temporal expression of CD71. In addition, Vpx increased permissivity of CD71– and CD71+cells to HIV-1 infection with no apparent bias. These results confirm that Vpx directly renders undifferentiated monocytes permissive to HIV-1 transduction without inducing their differentiation. The introduction of Vpx did not significantly alter APOBEC3G complex distribution, suggesting a restriction other than APOBEC3G was responsible for the resistance of monocytes to HIV-1. Collectively our results indicate that macrophages and monocytes harbor a potent antiviral restriction that is counteracted by the Vpx protein. The relative ability of primate lentiviruses and gammaretroviruses to transduce non-dividing myeloid-cells is dependent upon their ability to neutralize this restriction.

Vpu has been shown to possess two distinct roles in the pathogenesis of HIV. First, Vpu has been shown to down-regulate the expression of CD4 molecules at the plasma membrane of infected cells by targeting CD4 molecules for degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Second, Vpu promotes viral egress in specific cell lines termed non-permissive cells by mechanism that remain relatively unclear. Therefore, experiments were conducted in order to identify cellular factors involved in the Vpu-dependent phenotype. Using full-length Vpu as bait in yeast two-hybrid experiments, several candidate cellular factors were identified. One protein, SNAPIN, was identified as a cellular factor putatively involved in the Vpu-dependent phenotype. Further experiments determined that not only do SNAPIN and Vpu interact, but that Vpu also leads to the degradation of SNAPIN by both proteasomal and lysosomal degradation pathways. Over-expression of SNAPIN in cell lines that do not normally require Vpu expression for viral production resulted in a Vpu-dependent phenotype. While over-expression of SNAPIN in otherwise permissive cell lines significantly reduced Vpu-deficient virus production, wild type levels remained relatively constant. Importantly, no defective viral structural protein production was observed; however, intracellular p24/p55 did not accumulate suggesting that in SNAPIN expressing cells, Gag is also targeted for degradation. In addition, the reduction of SNAPIN expression in non-permissive cell lines significantly increased viral titers in supernatants. Of particular interest, even in cells expressing Bst-2 (a previously identified cellular factor involved in the Vpu-phenotype), siRNA mediated knockdown of SNAPIN led to increased viral titers. In addition, the co-transfection of siRNAs targeting both SNAPIN and Bst-2 resulted in an additive effect, in which Vpu-deficient viral titers were nearly equivalent to wild-type titers. Surprisingly, siRNA-mediated knockdown of SNAPIN in Jurkat cells was sufficient to overcome any restriction in viral egress imposed by the deletion of Vpu. Conversely, siRNA targeting Bst-2 had little or no effect on viral titers in Jurkat cells regardless of whether it was transfected alone or in combination with siRNAs targeting SNAPIN. These experiments provide evidence of an alternate cellular restriction mechanism involved in viral egress that is countered by the HIV-1 accessory protein, Vpu. In addition, this research may provide further insight into the complex cellular networks involved in the trafficking of Gag through cellular endosomal pathways.

The Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is able to infect CD4+ T cells as well as macrophages. Macrophage-tropism has been linked to determinants in the envelope of HIV. These determinants allow envelopes to exploit low levels of CD4 for infection. Macrophages are an important reservoir of virus, especially during chronic infection, and are likely responsible for the bulk of virus produced after CD4+T cells have declined. Viral factors that may impact the ability to infect macrophages are worth studying because this cell type is so important in infection. It was previously reported that the macrophage-tropic primary isolate AD8 was vpu-independent. The molecular clone YU-2, derived from brain tissue without culture, was also reported to be macrophage-tropic despite having a mutation in the vpu start codon. It was therefore possible that vpu-independent envelopes could evolve in vivo. To examine this possibility, I constructed chimeras containing wild type or defective vpu start codons, and gp160 sequences from AD8, YU-2 or SF162 (a vpu-dependent control). I also used full length AD8 and YU-2 with wild type or defective vpu start codons. I infected macrophages with equal amounts of virus, and measured viral output over two weeks. Viruses with defective vpu start codons were released to lower levels compared to their wild type vpucounterparts. In contrast to previous reports, the AD8 envelope is not vpu-independent for replication in macrophages. The YU-2 envelope is also not vpu-independent. Macrophage-tropic envelopes from late stages of infection can be sensitive to antibodies that bind the CD4 binding site on gp120, implying that macrophage-tropic envelopes have more exposed CD4 binding sites. Neutralizing antibodies may act as modulators of macrophage-tropism over the course of infection. Using chimeras containing gp120 sequences derived from the PBMC of four HIV+patients, I examined the capacity for envelopes to infect macrophages. Three patients (MM1, 4, and 8) had macrophage-tropic envelopes before and after developing autologous neutralizing antibodies. Three patients (MM1, 4, and 23) developed heterologous antibodies against IIIB, an easily neutralized T-cell line adapted strain of HIV-1. This data indicates that macrophage-tropism in these patients is not modulated by the presence of neutralizing antibodies. The macrophage-tropism of envelopes tends to segregate depending on the tissue origin of the virus. Envelopes from two separate tissues from the same patient exhibit very different infectivity characteristics. The B33 envelope, from brain tissue, is very infectious and is macrophage-tropic, while the LN40 envelope, from lymph node tissue, is weakly infectious and is not macrophage-tropic. Replacing the entire gp41 of LN40 with that of B33 restores some infectivity to LN40. The cytoplasmic domain of gp41 contains many motifs important for assembly and infectivity. To examine which motifs are responsible for the weak infectivity of LN40, I made chimeras of gp41, as well as point mutations in gp41. The LN40 chimera containing the entire gp41 of B33 restored the most infectivity. Point mutations in the palmitoylation site, Pr55gagbinding region, and dileucine motif at the C-terminus also restored infectivity when combined. Determinants in the gp41 cytoplasmic domain are responsible for the weak infectivity of LN40; however, it is possible that there are contributing determinants in gp120, such as the ability to use low levels of CD4. Here, I examined how changes in the vpu and env genes of HIV-1 can impact infectivity, especially infectivity of macrophages. Changes that adversely impact the virus’ ability to infect macrophages may also impact the overall course of disease. However, the data here show that retaining the ability to infect, and replicate in, macrophages give HIV an advantage. I speculate that retaining the ability to infect macrophages gives the virus a reservoir for later in disease, when CD4+ T cells have been depleted, as well as way of avoiding neutralizing antibodies. This work further defines the importance of macrophages in HIV-1 infectivity and disease.