Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-09-11T11:20:54Z No. of bitstreams: 1 474717 - Texto Completo.pdf: 2872727 bytes, checksum: 156aef3e37b8e3496e76e84ebc56c3e1 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-11T11:20:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 474717 - Texto Completo.pdf: 2872727 bytes, checksum: 156aef3e37b8e3496e76e84ebc56c3e1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-03-20 / Webdocumentaries are works regarding the historical world developed for distribution and fruition in the World Wide Web. The goal of this paper is to comprehend what kind of participation this new gender proposes for users, tracing a qualitative analysis of interaction in webdocumentaries. Two webdocumentaries with different formats were selected for analyses: Fort McMoney and Bear 71. Both were examined according to the modes of interaction proposed by Gaudenzi (2013), modes of interaction by Nash (2012) and mutual and reactive interaction, defined by Primo (2000, 2011). Following the examination we present a proposal identifying three uses of interaction in webdocumentaries: to reinforce/stablish bond between user and the work/subject depicted, to reinforce the author?s argument, and to share the author?s role. / Webdocument?rios s?o obras que tratam do mundo hist?rico, sendo desenvolvidas para distribui??o e frui??o na World Wide Web. O objetivo do trabalho ? compreender que tipo de participa??o ? proposta para os usu?rios nesse novo g?nero, tra?ando uma an?lise qualitativa da intera??o em webdocument?rios. Foram selecionados dois webdocument?rios com formatos distintos: Fort McMoney e Bear 71. Ambos s?o examinados de acordo com os conceitos de modos de intera??o proposto por Gaudenzi (2013), os modos de intera??o de Nash (2012), e a intera??o m?tua e reativa de Primo (2000, 2011). Ap?s a an?lise, apresentamos uma proposta que identifica tr?s usos da intera??o em webdocument?rios: refor?ar/estabelecer o v?nculo com o usu?rio, refor?ar o argumento do autor, e partilhar a fun??o do autor.