We investigate weak Cayley table isomorphisms, a generalization of group isomorphisms. Suppose G and H are groups. A bijective map phi : G to H is a weak Cayley table isomorphism if it satisfies two conditions:(1) If x is conjugate to y, then phi(x) is conjugate to phi(y); (2) For all x, y in G, phi(xy) is conjugate to phi(x)phi(y).If there exists a weak Cayley table isomorphism between two groups, then we say that the two groups have the same weak Cayley table.This dissertation has two main goals. First, we wish to find sufficient conditions under which two groups have the same weak Cayley table. We specifically study Frobenius groups and groups which satisfy the Camina pair condition. Second, we consider the group of all weak Cayley table isomorphisms between G and itself. We call this group the weak Cayley table group of G and denote it by W(G). Any automorphism of G is an element of W. The inverse map on G is also an element of W. We say that the weak Cayley table group is trivial if it is generated by the set of all automorphisms of G and the inverse map. Stephen Humphries proved that the symmetric groups S_n, the dihedral groups D_{2n} and the free groups F_n (n not equal to 3) all have trivial weak Cayley table groups. We will investigate the weak Cayley table groups of the alternating groups, certain types of Coxeter groups, the projective special linear groups and certain sporadic simple groups.

Let G be a group. A Weak Cayley Table mapping ϕ : G → G is a bijection such that ϕ(g1g2) is conjugate to ϕ(g1)ϕ(g2) for all g1, g2 in G. The set of all such mappings forms a group W(G) under composition. We study W(G) for the seventeen wallpaper groups G.

In 1896, Frobenius began the study of character theory while factoring the group determinant. Later in 1963, Brauer pointed out that the relationship between characters and their groups was still not fully understood. He published a series of questions that he felt would be important to resolve. In response to these questions, Johnson, Mattarei, and Sehgal developed the idea of a weak Cayley table map between groups. The set of all weak Cayley table maps from one group to itself also has a group structure, which we will call the weak Cayley table group. We will examine the weak Cayley table group of AGL(1; p) and the dicyclic groups, a nd a normal subgroup of the weak Cayley table group for a special case with Camina pairs and Semi-Direct products with a normal Hall-π subgroup, and look at some nontrivial weak Cayley table elements for certain p-groups. We also define a relative weak Cayley table and a relative weak Cayley table map. We will examine the relationship between relative weak Cayley table maps and weak Cayley table maps, automorphisms and anti-automorphisms, characters and spherical functions.

Let G be a group. A weak Cayley table isomorphism $\phi$: G $\rightarrow$ G is a bijection satisfying two conditions: (i) $phi$ sends conjugacy classes to conjugacy classes; and (ii) $\phi$(g1)$\phi$(g2) is conjugate to $\phi$(g1g2) for all g1, g2 in G. The set of all such mappings forms a group W(G) under composition. We study W(G) for fifty-six of the two hundred nineteen three-dimensional crystallographic groups G as well as some other groups. These fifty-six groups are related to our previous work on wallpaper groups.

The parastrophic matrix and Weak Cayley Tables are matrices that have close ties to the character table. Work by Ken Johnson has shown that fusion of groups induces a relationship between the character tables of the groups. In this paper we will demonstrate a similar induced relationship between the parastrophic matrices and Weak Cayley Tables of the fused groups.