<p dir="ltr">Force and moment measurements are valuable tools for evaluating designs in a wind tunnel environment. In fact, this type of research has been conducted ever since the earliest wind tunnels were in use. Load measurement techniques are complicated by hypersonic wind tunnel designs, which often have much shorter test times due to the immense stagnation pressures that are used. Previous research had been conducted once before in the Boeing/AFOSR Mach 6 Quiet Tunnel (BAM6QT) at Purdue University using a six-component moment balance. This initial testing utilized a balance with maximum load limits which far exceeded the loads experienced within the BAM6QT. Because of this, much of the data collected was imprecise. </p><p dir="ltr">Testing was conducted in the BAM6QT using three different balances - a five-component foil, five-component semiconductor, and six-component semiconductor balance. Data were taken for a variety of geometry configurations over a range of total pressures. All data were taken at 0 degree angle of attack. The two geometries used most commonly were the 1 inch diameter blunt nose-tip, 7 degree half-angle, 1.75 inch base diameter cone, with either a 20 degree or 30 degree curved ramp. An additional sharp nose-tip configuration was also used. Results for multiple load components were calculated during each run and compared between each balance type. Results were compared to the surface panel method results of CBAERO, which uses either modified Newtonian theory or the tangent cone method to compute loads. </p><p dir="ltr">Results between each balance type were similar and generally in good agreement. The semiconductor balance designs showed considerably less noise than the foil design. Results of CBAERO matched well with the balance data, with a baseline comparison of the plain blunt cone showing a maximum difference of 12% for the modified Newtonian theory. The more complicated ramp geometries, which exhibited regions of flow detachment, agreed surprisingly well with CBAERO results, despite the more complicated flow phenomena, which was unexpected. The best agreement was generally seen in the cases where the large 30 degree ramp was used, while the sharp nose-tip configuration produced the worst agreement. Overall, CBAERO proved valuable as an approximate method for determining the general magnitude of loads. The sting, used to mount the model in the wind tunnel, was found to drive the oscillation frequency of the model-sting system. The longer sting and less stiff balance used on the six-component system likely contributed to lower oscillation frequencies which affected the results for the pitching moment and normal force. The relationship between startup and running loads was also investigated and a startup-to-running load ratio of 5 to 20 was determined, depending on the load component and geometry.</p>

<p>The first force and moment measurements were conducted in the BAM6QT. Three 7-degree half-angle sharp cones were tested, one with base radius of 4.5 in. and two with base radius of 3.5 in. made out of different materials. Models were tested at 0 and 2 degrees angle of attack. Models were tested over a range of burst pressures and Reynolds numbers. Models were fitted onto a strain gauge, 6 component, internal, moment balance. Multiple assemblies were tested that mounted the balance in the BAM6QT. High-speed schlieren video was used to monitor flow conditions and track the movement of the tunnel and model. Three entries were performed in the BAM6QT. The improvement in data quality with each new entry is shown and the startup and running loads from entry 3 are analyzed.</p> <p>Startup loads were measured and are of importance in determining the load range needed to operate in the BAM6QT. Large startup loads up to 40X the running load were identified. Tunnel movement was measured and was used to approximate the inertial loading during startup and the run. The inertial loading was not found to be the cause of the large startup loads. Schlieren video was used to qualitatively review the startup flow. It was found the large startup loads in axial force were plausibly from the high-pressure subsonic flow evacuating the nozzle. For normal force and pitching moment, the startup loads peak at a different time than axial force and appear to be from a shock-shock interaction nearby the model. Trends in startup load with changing model geometry, AoA, and burst pressure were put together to form an empirical estimation for startup loads sharp cones. </p> <p>Running loads were profiled and found to be trending with burst pressure and model geometry similarly to Newtonian flow theory predictions. However, due to the lack of a base pressure measurement, the results are uncorrected for sting effects and differ from Newtonian flow theory by a scalar. A 5.3 Hz oscillation in axial force was identified. The frequency of the oscillation is the same as the frequency of the quasi-steady flow periods caused by the reflection of the expansion fan in the driver tube. Normal force during the running load was found to be measuring positive loads when at 0 degrees angle of attack. Both the axial and normal force phenomena were unexpected and were investigated but both require further research. </p> <p><br></p> <p><br></p> <p><br></p> <p><br></p>