Spelling suggestions: "subject:"worknonwork interference"" "subject:"nonwork interference""
1 |
Work and Non-work Boundary Management: Using Communication and Information TechnologyPark, YoungAh 07 October 2009 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Job characteristics, work-nonwork interference and the role of recovery strategies among employees in a tertiary institution / Jani OosthuizenJanuary 2011 (has links)
The tertiary education environment has become known for its stressful working conditions.
Factors such as high work demands (i.e. work overload, excessive time demands and work
pressure) and insufficient resources (i.e. limited developmental possibilities, poor performance
feedback, lack of support, etc.) all contribute to these stressful circumstances. As a result, these
circumstances can cause employees to experience negative interferences between their work and
nonwork roles. In addition, employees do not have adequate time to invest in their nonwork
domains, hence nonwork roles are neglected (such as being a parent, being a spouse, spending
time on domestic activities and spending time on religious/spiritual activities). To decrease these
negative interferences, it is important for employees to recover from strains that were activated at
work. The objectives of this study were to determine 1) which demands and resources
significantly predicted work-nonwork interference among employees working in a tertiary
education institution; and 2) which recovery strategies were significant in dealing with high
levels of work-nonwork interference caused by high demands and a lack of resources.
A random sample of 366 married parents was taken from a tertiary education institution in the
North-West Province. A list was obtained of all the married parents of the institution. All of
these employees were given the choice to participate in the research. A measuring battery
measuring job demands (i.e. work pressure, emotional demands and cognitive demands), job
resources (i.e. autonomy, social support and developmental possibilities), work-nonwork
interference (i.e. work-parent, work-spouse, work-domestic and work-religion/spirituality) and
recovery strategies (psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery and control) respectively was utilised in this study. Descriptive and inferential statistics, Cronbach alpha coefficients, Pearson
product-moment correlations and stepwise multiple regression, using the enter method, were
used to analyse the data. The results indicate that work pressure and emotional demands
significantly predict interference between all four nonwork roles. Additionally, autonomy and
developmental possibilities significantly predicted work-parent and work-religion/spirituality
interference respectively. Furthermore, all of the recovery strategies decreased specific worknonwork
interference. Psychological detachment decreased the interference between the workspouse
relationship and the work-religion/spirituality relationship. Relaxation predicted the
decrease of interference between the following relationships: work-parent, work-spouse, and
work-domestic. Mastery and control only significantly predicted the decrease of interference
between the work-parent relationship and between the work-domestic activities respectively.
Various recommendations were made for tertiary education institutions as well as for future
research. Tertiary education institutions should manage high job demands by examining
employees’ workload and job descriptions. Managers could possibly diminish work pressure and
emotional demands by means of courses/workshops pertaining to self-management, time and
organisational skills, emotional intelligence and/or coping with emotions. Tertiary education
institutions should also focus on supporting employees who experience work-nonwork
interferences and manage it effectively. In addition, the awareness of recovery and various
recovery strategies should be promoted. Recommendations for future research include expanding
the research to other occupational groups, longitudinal research designs, obtaining various
opinions and perspectives of individuals also involved in the work-nonwork dyad and the study
of the positive interaction between the work and nonwork roles. / Thesis (M.A. (Industrial Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011
|
3 |
Job characteristics, work-nonwork interference and the role of recovery strategies among employees in a tertiary institution / Jani OosthuizenJanuary 2011 (has links)
The tertiary education environment has become known for its stressful working conditions.
Factors such as high work demands (i.e. work overload, excessive time demands and work
pressure) and insufficient resources (i.e. limited developmental possibilities, poor performance
feedback, lack of support, etc.) all contribute to these stressful circumstances. As a result, these
circumstances can cause employees to experience negative interferences between their work and
nonwork roles. In addition, employees do not have adequate time to invest in their nonwork
domains, hence nonwork roles are neglected (such as being a parent, being a spouse, spending
time on domestic activities and spending time on religious/spiritual activities). To decrease these
negative interferences, it is important for employees to recover from strains that were activated at
work. The objectives of this study were to determine 1) which demands and resources
significantly predicted work-nonwork interference among employees working in a tertiary
education institution; and 2) which recovery strategies were significant in dealing with high
levels of work-nonwork interference caused by high demands and a lack of resources.
A random sample of 366 married parents was taken from a tertiary education institution in the
North-West Province. A list was obtained of all the married parents of the institution. All of
these employees were given the choice to participate in the research. A measuring battery
measuring job demands (i.e. work pressure, emotional demands and cognitive demands), job
resources (i.e. autonomy, social support and developmental possibilities), work-nonwork
interference (i.e. work-parent, work-spouse, work-domestic and work-religion/spirituality) and
recovery strategies (psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery and control) respectively was utilised in this study. Descriptive and inferential statistics, Cronbach alpha coefficients, Pearson
product-moment correlations and stepwise multiple regression, using the enter method, were
used to analyse the data. The results indicate that work pressure and emotional demands
significantly predict interference between all four nonwork roles. Additionally, autonomy and
developmental possibilities significantly predicted work-parent and work-religion/spirituality
interference respectively. Furthermore, all of the recovery strategies decreased specific worknonwork
interference. Psychological detachment decreased the interference between the workspouse
relationship and the work-religion/spirituality relationship. Relaxation predicted the
decrease of interference between the following relationships: work-parent, work-spouse, and
work-domestic. Mastery and control only significantly predicted the decrease of interference
between the work-parent relationship and between the work-domestic activities respectively.
Various recommendations were made for tertiary education institutions as well as for future
research. Tertiary education institutions should manage high job demands by examining
employees’ workload and job descriptions. Managers could possibly diminish work pressure and
emotional demands by means of courses/workshops pertaining to self-management, time and
organisational skills, emotional intelligence and/or coping with emotions. Tertiary education
institutions should also focus on supporting employees who experience work-nonwork
interferences and manage it effectively. In addition, the awareness of recovery and various
recovery strategies should be promoted. Recommendations for future research include expanding
the research to other occupational groups, longitudinal research designs, obtaining various
opinions and perspectives of individuals also involved in the work-nonwork dyad and the study
of the positive interaction between the work and nonwork roles. / Thesis (M.A. (Industrial Psychology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011
|
4 |
Job characteristics, work-nonwork interference and coping strategies among ministers of religion / Anna Sophia van der WesthuizenVan der Westhuizen, Anna Sophia January 2014 (has links)
Ministers have a very unique occupation with designated job demands and incongruous
resources at their disposal. Over the past few years numerous studies have been undertaken
different occupations’ regarding job demands and job resources. In contrast, limited studies were
done among ministers of religion, particularly in the context of the three Reformed sister
churches in South Africa. This is the case even though these ministers play such a key role in the
current social and religious sphere. Results from previous studies have shown that job demands
and the lack of resources have a major impact on the experience of work-nonwork interference
among individuals (Koekemoer & Mostert, 2006; Mostert, 2009, Mostert & Oosthuizen, 2006;
Tshabalala, 2007; Van Aarde & Mostert, 2008).This trend, however, has not been researched
amongst ministers before – particularly how ministers cope with this interference.
The overall objective of the present study was to investigate job demands and job resources as
significant predictors of work-nonwork interference for ministers of the three sister churches.
The focus also was on coping strategies that are significant in dealing with work-nonwork
interference. The possible moderation brought about by these coping strategies was also
investigated. Various hypotheses related to the overall objective were tested in the empirical
study. The design used for this study was a cross-sectional survey design undertaken among
ministers of the three sister churches mentioned. Various job demands, job resources, worknonwork
interference and coping strategies were measured. This was done by employing the
instruments of Peeters, Montgomery, Bakker and Schaufeli, (2005); Buys and Rothmann (2009);
Koekemoer, Mostert and Rothman, 2010; Geurts et al. (2005) and Carver, Scheier and
Weintraub (1989). Construct validity of all the instruments were proven with the CFA (Confirmatory Factor
Analysis) in the SPSS program. Descriptive statistics, cronbach alpha coefficients, Pearson and
Spearman product-moment correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to analyse
the data. Moderation regression analyses were also done to test for possible moderation of
specific coping strategies.
Results indicated that cognitive demands were related to the dimension of work-parent
interference. Emotional demands and pace and amount of work had a relation with all the various
dimensions of the work-nonwork interference. Congregational support related work-home
interference as well as work-religion/spirituality interference. Financial support, lack of
autonomy, as well as social support, related to all three dimensions of work-nonwork
interference. Job significance related work-religion/spirituality interference, whereas job
accomplishment predicted work-home interference and work-religion/spirituality interference.
The results of the predictors on work-parent interference included the following: cognitive
demands, pace and amount of work, financial support and turning-to-religion. Work-home
interference was predicted by the variables pace and amount of work and financial support.
Work-religion/spirituality interference were predicted by pace and amount of work, job
significance and turning to religion.
The various coping strategies (turning-to-religion, seeking-emotional-support, active coping,
acceptance coping, planning and avoidance coping) functioned as moderators between certain
specific job demands, job resources and dimensions of work-nonwork interference.
Limitations of the study were discussed and recommendations were put forward for future
studies on this topic. / MCom (Industrial Psychology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
5 |
Job characteristics, work-nonwork interference and coping strategies among ministers of religion / Anna Sophia van der WesthuizenVan der Westhuizen, Anna Sophia January 2014 (has links)
Ministers have a very unique occupation with designated job demands and incongruous
resources at their disposal. Over the past few years numerous studies have been undertaken
different occupations’ regarding job demands and job resources. In contrast, limited studies were
done among ministers of religion, particularly in the context of the three Reformed sister
churches in South Africa. This is the case even though these ministers play such a key role in the
current social and religious sphere. Results from previous studies have shown that job demands
and the lack of resources have a major impact on the experience of work-nonwork interference
among individuals (Koekemoer & Mostert, 2006; Mostert, 2009, Mostert & Oosthuizen, 2006;
Tshabalala, 2007; Van Aarde & Mostert, 2008).This trend, however, has not been researched
amongst ministers before – particularly how ministers cope with this interference.
The overall objective of the present study was to investigate job demands and job resources as
significant predictors of work-nonwork interference for ministers of the three sister churches.
The focus also was on coping strategies that are significant in dealing with work-nonwork
interference. The possible moderation brought about by these coping strategies was also
investigated. Various hypotheses related to the overall objective were tested in the empirical
study. The design used for this study was a cross-sectional survey design undertaken among
ministers of the three sister churches mentioned. Various job demands, job resources, worknonwork
interference and coping strategies were measured. This was done by employing the
instruments of Peeters, Montgomery, Bakker and Schaufeli, (2005); Buys and Rothmann (2009);
Koekemoer, Mostert and Rothman, 2010; Geurts et al. (2005) and Carver, Scheier and
Weintraub (1989). Construct validity of all the instruments were proven with the CFA (Confirmatory Factor
Analysis) in the SPSS program. Descriptive statistics, cronbach alpha coefficients, Pearson and
Spearman product-moment correlations and multiple regression analyses were used to analyse
the data. Moderation regression analyses were also done to test for possible moderation of
specific coping strategies.
Results indicated that cognitive demands were related to the dimension of work-parent
interference. Emotional demands and pace and amount of work had a relation with all the various
dimensions of the work-nonwork interference. Congregational support related work-home
interference as well as work-religion/spirituality interference. Financial support, lack of
autonomy, as well as social support, related to all three dimensions of work-nonwork
interference. Job significance related work-religion/spirituality interference, whereas job
accomplishment predicted work-home interference and work-religion/spirituality interference.
The results of the predictors on work-parent interference included the following: cognitive
demands, pace and amount of work, financial support and turning-to-religion. Work-home
interference was predicted by the variables pace and amount of work and financial support.
Work-religion/spirituality interference were predicted by pace and amount of work, job
significance and turning to religion.
The various coping strategies (turning-to-religion, seeking-emotional-support, active coping,
acceptance coping, planning and avoidance coping) functioned as moderators between certain
specific job demands, job resources and dimensions of work-nonwork interference.
Limitations of the study were discussed and recommendations were put forward for future
studies on this topic. / MCom (Industrial Psychology), North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2014
|
Page generated in 0.0942 seconds