This study examines the short-term shareholder wealth effects to U.S. bank mergers and acquisitions (M&As) that were announced and completed between 1989 and 2004. Using various event windows, the cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) to target firms are positive, bidder firm abnormal returns are negative, and the combined CARs are positive. This result is consistent with the synergy and hubris hypothesis wherein bank M&As are wealth-creating events as synergies exist; however, bidders may overpay to realize these gains. <p>The M&As are examined by the method with which they are financed, namely, cash, or a combination of cash, stock, and/or debt, versus stock only. The target, bidder and combined mean CARs for M&As that are financed by a cash or combination payment are higher than those that are financed by stock for the full sample period and the 1999 2003 sub-sample period. Furthermore, the results indicate a positive and statistically significant relationship between the bidder and combined CARs and cash or combination payments. <p>Further evidence presented suggests a positive and statistically significant relationship between the target CARs and whether the M&A is geographically focusing (intrastate), with no corresponding relationship existing for the bidder and combined firms. Results, however, do indicate that the mean combined CARs are higher for intrastate compared to interstate M&As. In addition, the target, bidder and combined CARs are driven in part by the relative size of the merger parties.

This study examines macroeconomic and industry-level factors (with particular emphasis on the business cycle) on industry-level merger activity. In a sample of US mergers from 1979 to 2006, we find that industry level mergers are highly pro-cyclical. The business cycle has a positive and significant impact on both horizontal and non-horizontal mergers, even after controlling for other macroeconomic and industry-level effects. Although macroeconomic variables have similar effects on both horizontal and non-horizontal mergers, industry-level factors vary significantly between the two types of mergers. Horizontal mergers are much more aligned with neo-classical theories, while non-horizontal mergers are more affected by financing constraints and overvaluation. We also find that the determinants and financing preferences of industry-level mergers vary greatly across the business cycle stages, which suggests that the motivation for mergers changes in different economic conditions.

Cross-border acquisitions as effective strategic choicesare used widely to enhance competitive advantages inChinese enterprises in manufacturing industry. The decisionmaking is influenced by certain institutions under theuniqueness of Chinese socialism system. This study investigatesthe influence of institutions towards the decisionmaking of cross-border acquisitions. The study aims to build a conceptual model to identifythe major regulative institutions and how they are influencingthe decision making of cross-border acquisitionsin Chinese manufacturing industry. The study conducts a case study on Lenovo and Geelybased on secondary data to investigate the influence ofregulative institutions on cross-border acquisitions. The decision making of cross-border acquisitions inmanufacturing enterprises is influenced by regulative institutionsfrom international and national level which presentedin three ways. First, the supportive regulation institutionscreate a favorable environment for cross-borderacquisitions. Second, government promotes cross-borderacquisitions by using policy as guidance. Third, the imperfectof the legal system impede the organizationsprogress.

This study examines the short-term shareholder wealth effects to U.S. bank mergers and acquisitions (M&As) that were announced and completed between 1989 and 2004. Using various event windows, the cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) to target firms are positive, bidder firm abnormal returns are negative, and the combined CARs are positive. This result is consistent with the synergy and hubris hypothesis wherein bank M&As are wealth-creating events as synergies exist; however, bidders may overpay to realize these gains. <p>The M&As are examined by the method with which they are financed, namely, cash, or a combination of cash, stock, and/or debt, versus stock only. The target, bidder and combined mean CARs for M&As that are financed by a cash or combination payment are higher than those that are financed by stock for the full sample period and the 1999 2003 sub-sample period. Furthermore, the results indicate a positive and statistically significant relationship between the bidder and combined CARs and cash or combination payments. <p>Further evidence presented suggests a positive and statistically significant relationship between the target CARs and whether the M&A is geographically focusing (intrastate), with no corresponding relationship existing for the bidder and combined firms. Results, however, do indicate that the mean combined CARs are higher for intrastate compared to interstate M&As. In addition, the target, bidder and combined CARs are driven in part by the relative size of the merger parties.

This study examines macroeconomic and industry-level factors (with particular emphasis on the business cycle) on industry-level merger activity. In a sample of US mergers from 1979 to 2006, we find that industry level mergers are highly pro-cyclical. The business cycle has a positive and significant impact on both horizontal and non-horizontal mergers, even after controlling for other macroeconomic and industry-level effects. Although macroeconomic variables have similar effects on both horizontal and non-horizontal mergers, industry-level factors vary significantly between the two types of mergers. Horizontal mergers are much more aligned with neo-classical theories, while non-horizontal mergers are more affected by financing constraints and overvaluation. We also find that the determinants and financing preferences of industry-level mergers vary greatly across the business cycle stages, which suggests that the motivation for mergers changes in different economic conditions.

The following is the presentation of our master thesis study which intended to studied from a Human Resources perspective the M&amp;A process. “What defines the integration achievement in a M&amp;A process from a organizational level perspective?” This represents the main issue to answer and discuss about. It was conducted by the analysis of New Wave Group and Orrefors Kosta Boda acquisition process as the case study, representing the reality field and source of practical implications. To answer this research question, it was selected some of the most important elements of the Human Resources Strategies like Leadership and communication, motivation and commitment. Moreover, two main stages made up the attention of our study; the pre stage negotiation, and the post acquisition phase. The principal outcome constitutes the analysis in practical and theoretical terms, of the special condition of acquisitions with one dominant part constituting the “big saviour” and how this change is traduced into the integration process.

Background Synergies or rather the absence of synergies has been blamed for many failures in regards to mergers and acquisitions. Still, there are companies using mergers and acquisitions as a natural part of their growth strategy, indicating that these organizations manage to handle synergies efficiently. Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyze synergies in regards to mergers and acquisitions in technical trading companies to learn about success factors. Method Because of synergies’ complexity this study has used a qualitative approach. The empirical findings have been compiled by semi-conducted interviews with company representatives from the organizations regarded in the study. Conclusion The conclusion points at several success factors in regards to synergies and mergers and acquisitions. However, the three most important were found to be; the entrepreneurship and human capital, the corporate head’s knowledge, the experience and selection capability and the inclusion of acquisitions (developed from the urge for growth) in their business models.

<p>The first essay of my dissertation introduces a new method for eliciting market beliefs about the expected outcomes of a merger negotiation after announcement. During a merger negotiation, the market prices of the firms involved</p><p>reflect beliefs about their values both in the merged and</p><p>standalone states, as well as the likelihood of either outcome.</p><p>These beliefs determine stock price reactions to news of a possible</p><p>merger, but those prices alone do not contain sufficient information</p><p>to identify the latent beliefs that they reflect. I develop a new</p><p>method which, by using additional data in the form of option prices,</p><p>is able to identify these beliefs. This method allows for a clear</p><p>decomposition of a negotiating firm's expected value change into two</p><p>parts: the value of the transaction to the firm, and new information</p><p>about its standalone value. Previous research into estimating</p><p>merger synergies has struggled to obtain an appropriate alternative</p><p>against which to measure the realized outcome. The market's beliefs</p><p>about state-contingent firm values give an estimate of both. Through</p><p>a direct comparison of the estimates of a firm's value in both the</p><p>merged and standalone states, I obtain a strong, practical measure</p><p>of the expected value-creating potential of a merger before its</p><p>consummation.</p><p>The second essay applies the state-contingent payoff estimation method developed previously to addressing questions about the size effect in mergers. A growing body of evidence indicates that large acquisitions destroy value. However, we do not yet know why. Several theories have been advanced, but their effects are difficult to observe in isolation. It has thus been impossible to tell whether negative post-announcement acquirer returns are caused by market expectations of value-destroying acquisitions or revealed bad news about standalone value. This paper resolves this issue by decomposing expectations about merger outcomes into expected value change from completing the acquisition and revision of beliefs about standalone firm value. The data show that deal size is correlated with value destruction, while acquirer size is correlated with release of unfavorable information. Deal size correlates with value destruction, acquirer size with bad news about the firm. Furthermore, the results suggest that overpayment is a prerequisite for large acquisitions. These findings reduce the set of possible theoretical explanations for the size effect.</p> / Dissertation

Recent years, global steel industry has become oversupply caused by economic recession of the world, and lots of steel makers suffered serious deficit. In order to improve the business performance or create the conglomerate synergy, many decisions of mergers and acquisitions rose all around the world. It happened seldom for Taiwan¡¦s small and medium-sized enterprises to adopt the strategy of mergers and acquisitions. However, due to globalization, deregulation, and operating capital accumulation in Taiwan¡¦s business, it becomes a strategy of fast-growth for enterprises to adopt mergers and acquisitions. Unfortunately, very few cases of mergers and acquisitions are adopted in Taiwan¡¦s steel industry except China Steel Co., Ltd (CSC). On the other hand, it may be an opportunity for Taiwan steel industry to improve its structure, to reinforce its management constitution, to create production synergy, to pursuit quick growth, and to build its competitive advantages by the strategy of mergers and acquisitions since there is a great demand of steel for Mainland China market. The research uses the method of case study and deduces to a generalized model of enterprise¡¦s mergers and acquisitions theoretically, and induces with individual facts to analyze the secondary data of steel industry and the interview data of case with exploratory qualitative research. The case study of CSC merging Yieh Loong enterprise tries to find the strategic goal, motives, and have a further exploration about the execution process of mergers and acquisitions, the discussions which manage the performance, such as raw materials, marketing, financial affairs and human resources after merging, in order to analyze the reasons of its success or failure, and build to construct out the management style that the suitable steel industry merges. This research tries to build the steel industry's optimum model of mergers and acquisitions, and propose that the global steel industry is under the trend of the regional economic and trade integration, causing the globalization overall arrangement management tactics. The best market-Mainland China that has become Taiwan and global steel industry carried on the alliance or merged in addition. The case that China Steel Co. merged Yieh Loong Enterprise can be a good example for Taiwan steel manufacturers to carry on the growth strategy that maintain its internal competencies and resist foreign aggression.

Mergers and acquisitions (M&As) are one of the most important strategies for pharmaceutical and the biotechnology industry to gain access to valuable technological resources in recent years. The M&As activities and outcomes of famous pharmaceutical company ¡V Roche, and biotech leading company ¡V Genentech were investigated in this study. Thus, the innovation, product pipeline and financial performance were examined to elucidate the crucial strategies of M&As. Nowadays, the challenges of pharmaceutical company includes the growth rate of research and development (R&D) cost were higher than sales¡¦, new drugs development were slower than industry demand, licensing from other company and high profit patent drugs turned into generics. By innovative and vigorous development of biotechnology, biotech companies were devoted into niche products includes nucleic acid or protein drugs. However, large R&D expenditure and high risk product development result in capital shortage problems. The abundant working capital and well-experienced manufacture, marketing and sales characteristics of big pharma enable the M&As of pharma and biotech arise. This study case describe the M&A of an over a century pharmaceutical company ¡V Roche with a first IPO biotech company ¡V Genentech. To survey the process of licensing, merger, acquisition and public offerings, the motivation, strategies and outcomes were examined. In 2006, over the half of top ten sales of Roche were derived from Genentech; therefore, the global marketing and brand value of Roche contribute Genentech into the top one market value biotech company. The synergistic effect seems the M&A is a perfect integration. However, the majority equity owned by Roche and the oversea sales licensing to Roche were the further underlying problems for Genentech to expand to the top health care company in the world. The development of pharmaceutical company becoming more concentrated that the top ten pharmaceutics account for half of the global sales. Moreover, with the growing demand from the health care, aging and novel therapeutics and under the threatens of health insurance payment and patent drug expired, the tide of M&As for pharmaceutical and biotech companies will not decline. The weakness of Taiwan pharmaceutics is poor in innovation and generic drugs-oriented manufacture; furthermore, the biotech industry is still beyond maturity. Under the waves of M&As, the Taiwan pharmaceutical and biotech industry may prompt development by M&As. In this case study, the pharmaceutics and biotech background were first introduced and the case history, M&A process and strategies, product portfolio, R&D and financial issues were explored. Therefore, this study may fulfill and provide some suggestions and references for further pharmaceutical and biotech M&A activities in Taiwan.