41 |
Impacts of Medicaid Expansion on the Liability Insurance IndustryLuo, Jingshu January 2020 (has links)
This dissertation studies the impact of Medicaid expansion on the liability insurance industry. Within the three chapters, the first two chapters focus on the medical liability insurance industry, and the third chapter focuses on the auto insurance industry.
Chapter 1, “Medicaid Expansion and Medical Liability Costs”, examines the impact of health insurance expansion on medical liability costs using the case of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Medicaid expansion. Medicaid expansion has increased the demand for medical services, but in doing so it may also have increased physicians’ liability in medical practice. By studying malpractice costs to insurers, medical practitioners, and hospitals in the U.S. for the period 2010–2018, we find insurers operating in states with Medicaid expansion experienced significantly higher medical liability costs than those in non-expansion states. While insurers in expansion states did increase premiums, the increase was not enough to fully offset rising costs. Moreover, we find that tort reforms did not mitigate ACA-induced malpractice liability costs. We show this is because Medicaid expansion increased malpractice costs mainly by increasing claim frequency while tort reforms generally focus on reducing claim severity. We further find little evidence that hospitals paid higher malpractice insurance premiums, self-insurance, or incurred higher out-of-pocket medical liability losses after Medicaid expansion. Taken together, our results imply that it is medical practitioners and malpractice insurers who bear the rising medical liability costs.
Chapter 2, “Medicaid Expansion and Medical Liability Insurance Prices” extends the first chapter to study the impact of Medicaid expansion on medical liability insurance prices for three specialties, internal medicine, general surgery, and obstetrics-gynecology (OB-GYN). As Medicaid expansion increased medical liability costs to insurers, they may react by increasing medical malpractice insurance prices. By studying counties in expansion states and non-expansion states and bordering counties with different Medicaid expansion status over the years from 2010-2018, we find that Medicaid expansion leads to significantly higher medical liability insurance prices two years after the expansion on average and the impact is strongest for internal medicine and general medicine but less so for OB-GYN. Our finding suggests that the expansion of health insurance could increase liability costs to medical practitioners.
Auto insurance provides coverage of healthcare for injured drivers even for those without traditional health insurance coverage. The expansion of public health insurance provides low-income injured drivers with an additional source of coverage for medical bills. This may change drivers’ incentives for using auto insurance and the ultimate payments made by auto insurers. In Chapter 3, “Public Health Insurance Expansion and Auto Insurance: The Case of Medicaid Expansion”, we first use a simple theoretical model to illustrate how obtaining public health insurance mitigates the incentive of insured drivers to engage in claims buildup. We then empirically test how the Affordable Care Act (ACA)’s Medicaid expansion changed the medical costs covered by auto insurance. By studying private passenger auto insurers in expansion states and non-expansion states between 2010 and 2018, we find that Medicaid expansion led to significantly lower auto insurance losses and premiums. We further show that the results were driven by the decreasing losses and premiums for third-party liability insurers but not in the states with no-fault insurance. / Business Administration/Risk Management and Insurance
|
42 |
Konzervativní kritika Obamacare a její proměna v souvislosti s prezidentskou kandidaturou Donalda Trumpa / Conservative Criticism of Obamacare and its Transformation in the Context of Donald Trump Running for PresidentLeichterová, Jana January 2019 (has links)
Jana Leichterová Conservative Criticism of Obamacare and its Transformation in the Context of Donald Trump Running for President Abstract The thesis deals with the debate over the health care reforms in the United States. It focuses specifically on the debate over the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, a health care reform initiated by President Barack Obama that was signed into law in March 2010. The goal of the thesis is to identify the main arguments of the conservative criticism of the Affordable Care Act, and to determine whether the debate transformed with the emergence of Donald Trump onto the political scene. The thesis provides historical context of the three main approaches to the health care policies in the United States throughout the 20th century: the Social Security path of strong government in the 1930s, the mixed "American way" with government providing social benefits to citizens through private institutions in the 1970s, and the approach of unregulated free market since the 1980s. Obama's health care originates in the urge for a national solution of the high number of uninsured citizens (more than 50 million in 2009) and rising cost of health care. The reform has three essential pillars: 1. the reform of the health insurance market that unifies the diverse state approaches and...
|
43 |
Does Merger and Acquisition Activity Play a Role in The Pre-Existing Healthcare Initiatives of Improved Quality and Decreased Costs Highlighted by The Affordable Care Act?McKell, Dawn C 03 October 2016 (has links)
This is a quantitative study of archival data that examines Merger and Acquisition (M&A) activity using currently established healthcare quality and financial performance metrics. The research seeks to explicate the relationship between M&A activity and M&A experience in the healthcare industry as it relates to initiatives aimed at improving the quality and decreasing the cost of healthcare. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation appears to be contributing to a trend toward M&A consolidation; by illuminating how this trend potentially impacts healthcare quality and cost reduction initiatives, this study’s contribution is both useful and practical. The units of analysis are Medicare reporting hospitals, hospital systems, and related healthcare providers that have or have not experienced an M&A or multiple M&As.
The study shows a statistically significant improvement in quality each year from 2006–2014, which is reflected in higher scores for the four quality metrics measured. M&A activity, as measured by acquisition status and acquirer experience, did not appear to influence these quality metrics, with the exception of the heart failure measure, which showed a statistically significant positive influence of acquirer experience across all specifications.
M&A activity’s possible effects on hospital financial performance was assessed through operating-cost-to-charge and capital-cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs). The operating CCR appears to be positively influenced by both acquisition status and acquirer experience, while the capital CCR was positively influenced only by acquirer experience. A positive influence is reflected in a decreasing ratio.
Results on quality improvement over time, both before and after the ACA, suggest that the ACA itself may not be the driver for quality improvement. Similarly, decreases in OCCR occurred consistently and statistically significantly over time, both pre- and post-ACA, while CCCR showed statistically significant decreases in 2006–2008, 2013, and 2014. These results appear to support the notion that the trend was ongoing before the ACA was enacted and gave these measures high-profile exposure.
This is a quantitative study of archival data that examines Merger and Acquisition (M&A) activity using currently established healthcare quality and financial performance metrics. The research seeks to explicate the relationship between M&A activity and M&A experience in the healthcare industry as it relates to initiatives aimed at improving the quality and decreasing the cost of healthcare. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation appears to be contributing to a trend toward M&A consolidation; by illuminating how this trend potentially impacts healthcare quality and cost reduction initiatives, this study’s contribution is both useful and practical. The units of analysis are Medicare reporting hospitals, hospital systems, and related healthcare providers that have or have not experienced an M&A or multiple M&As.
The study shows a statistically significant improvement in quality each year from 2006–2014, which is reflected in higher scores for the four quality metrics measured. M&A activity, as measured by acquisition status and acquirer experience, did not appear to influence these quality metrics, with the exception of the heart failure measure, which showed a statistically significant positive influence of acquirer experience across all specifications.
M&A activity’s possible effects on hospital financial performance was assessed through operating-cost-to-charge and capital-cost-to-charge ratios (CCRs). The operating CCR appears to be positively influenced by both acquisition status and acquirer experience, while the capital CCR was positively influenced only by acquirer experience. A positive influence is reflected in a decreasing ratio.
Results on quality improvement over time, both before and after the ACA, suggest that the ACA itself may not be the driver for quality improvement. Similarly, decreases in OCCR occurred consistently and statistically significantly over time, both pre- and post-ACA, while CCCR showed statistically significant decreases in 2006–2008, 2013, and 2014. These results appear to support the notion that the trend was ongoing before the ACA was enacted and gave these measures high-profile exposure.
|
44 |
The Social Life of Health Behaviors: The Political Economy and Cultural Context of Health PracticesFletcher, Rebecca Adkins 01 June 2017 (has links)
Relocating health behaviors within a political-economic framework, this article utilizes health behavior and health insurance governance perspectives to showcase the complexities of cultural and economic factors (e.g., job lock, wage differentials, social location, and health insurance status) that influence choices in efforts to mitigate the financial burden of health risk. By exploring the financial links to health behaviors that emerged through ethnographic participant observation and semistructured interviews with community and union members of the United Steelworkers and Retail, Wholesale, and Department Store Union in a metropolitan Central Appalachian community in 2007–8, this article argues for expanding the health behaviors concept to include a broader array of actions individuals and families take to better their health and well-being in the context of neoliberal shifting of risk management to individuals through increased consumer market-based cost-sharing health insurance disincentives. In so doing, this article argues for the importance of social and political-economic context in health behaviors and in evaluating health policy, including the Affordable Care Act.
|
45 |
THE STATE HOUSE AND THE WHITE HOUSE: GUBERNATORIAL RHETORIC DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATIONTrantham, Austin Peyton 01 January 2017 (has links)
What is the importance of political speechmaking? Do state governors discuss presidential priorities? This study addresses these questions by analyzing the contents of annual State of the State addresses given by governors from 2012 to 2014 during the presidency of Barack Obama. A descriptive paper provides evidence that governors primarily discuss employment and economic issues in their addresses, are discussing greater number of policy issues than in previous decades, and are delivering their address before the presidential State of the Union message. Examining health care and immigration policy in separate empirical papers, I theorize that contextual factors, including legislative partisanship, public approval, and presidential influence may affect the extent to which policies supported by the Obama administration are rhetorically referenced by governors. Empirical analyses found limited support for the influence of divided government, but demonstrated significant evidence for the importance of including state-centric factors, including annual employment rate and proximity to Mexico, as well as temporal effects, into future analyses of gubernatorial rhetoric.
|
46 |
Affordable Care Act and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Among Adolescent FemalesNnakwe, Eunice Odaku 01 January 2018 (has links)
The human papilloma virus (HPV) is the most frequent cause of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) and cancers for U.S. adults. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2010, eliminated copay expenses for childhood immunizations and expanded access to health care. The purpose of this secondary data analysis study was to determine if there was an association between ACA and the usage of HPV vaccine among adolescent females in Georgia. Data concerning HPV vaccinations from 2011 to 2015 were obtained from the National Immunization Survey-Teen dataset. Andersen's BM of health care use was applied to ascertain the factors that enhanced the usage of HPV vaccine. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine if there was any association between ACA and HPV vaccination. The study results showed a significant association between ACA and provider visit (p<.05). Also, provider visit was significantly associated with HPV vaccination rate (p<.05). Adolescent females with health insurance had a higher rate of provider visit after the passage of ACA. From 2011 to 2015, 87.2% of insured adolescent females visited their provider. The rate of HPV vaccination increased among the insured adolescent females who visited the provider from 35.3% in 2011 to 53.9% in 2015. Provider visit was identified as the most influencing factor that enhanced usage of HPV vaccine. The knowledge gained from the results contributed to social change by providing insight on how, through increased provider visits, ACA has improved the HPV vaccination rate among teenage females in Georgia. The conclusion will assist in developing effective strategies and policies that will achieve the Healthy People 2020 goal of 80% of herd immunity against HPV.
|
47 |
The Phenomenological Evaluation of Social Worker Competencies in Patient-Centered Medical HomesStalling, Veda D. 01 January 2016 (has links)
The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is an innovative, team-based health care model that was applied during the implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). However, the competencies for PCMH health care social worker team members are not identified within this model. Thus, the purpose of this phenomenological study focused on identifying the core competencies that will enable social workers to perform competently in PCMHs. This study also explored the roles and training needs as related to improving the competence of social workers. Sandberg's and Parry's conceptualization of the competency model was used as the theoretical framework. Data were acquired through interviews with 10 PCMH social workers. These data were then inductively coded and analyzed using a modified Moustakas method. Key findings indicated that these social workers believed that improvements in competencies may include training and knowledge with mental health and physical health knowledge which consist of diagnoses, interventions, medications, symptoms, and terminology. It was also noted that knowledge of evidence-based practices for mental health interventions and patient-centered, team-based principles were essential to ACA policy implementation. The positive social change implications of this study include recommendations to health care leadership, educational institutions, and other PCMH providers to develop competency-based training for social workers. Recommendations are also put forth to adapt social work curriculum to ensure the effective implementation of the principles of the ACA policy and to improve social work practice in PCMH health care settings.
|
48 |
The Individual Mandate, Commerce Clause, and Supreme Court: Predicting the Court's Ruling in HHS v. FloridaMedling, Nicholas 01 January 2012 (has links)
An analysis of the evolution of the Commerce Clause, the Justices on the Supreme Court, and the arguments presented in this case indicate that the minimum coverage provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act will be struck down. Although the Court will likely be split 5 to 4 along ideological lines, each of the justices will have a unique rationale behind their decision. Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Scalia, and Justice Kennedy were heavily targeted by both parties’ oral and written arguments because there was speculation that any one of these traditionally conservative justices could be the fifth vote to uphold the individual mandate. However, it does not appear likely that the federal government supported their claims well enough to yield such a result. Instead, the Court will respond in the negative to the issue of "Whether Congress had the power under Article I of the Constitution to enact the minimum coverage provision." The Court’s interpretation of the Congress' commerce power has undergone two major expansions since the Constitution was ratified, and both of these expansions were met with a contractionary response to prevent the commerce clause’s growth into an unchecked power. This Court will not open a new frontier of power for the Congress, but rather it will respect the limits on Congressional power established by the Rehnquist Court.
|
49 |
Three Essays on the Impact of the Affordable Care Act Expansion of Dependent Coverage for Young AdultsQi, Yanling 11 August 2015 (has links)
To achieve the goal of universal coverage of health insurance for the Americans, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) was signed into law. The ACA targets at providing help to improve access to affordable health coverage for everyone and protect consumers from abusive insurance company practices. One of the precedent mandates, implemented in September 2010, is to expand coverage on young adults of age 19 to 26, who may lose insurance coverage due to the remove from their parents’ plan after age 18 and lacking of productivity to bargain with employers in the labor market.
This dissertation looks into the impact of the ACA health insurance coverage expansion for young adults on the subsequent health outcomes, health care utilization, and further social impact on traffic fatalities. Difference-in-differences models are used with different treatment groups and corresponding control groups. Chapter I uses survey data (BRFSS) to evaluate health care access, health behavior and self-assessed health status. The results suggest an improvement in health care access and self-assessed health but more risky behavior. Chapter II uses hospital discharge data (NIS) to estimate avoidable hospitalization in order to assess primary care utilization. The result shows that less primary care was consumed, which leads to more avoidable hospitalization but health may have been improved by using more hospital care. The results from both chapters imply potential ex ante moral hazard among young adults in the policy targeting age group. Thus, chapter III uses accident records data (FARS) to examine the impact of the health insurance expansion on traffic fatality for young adults, to see whether young drivers perform ex ante moral hazard through risky behavior like drunk and/or reckless driving after they get covered by the health insurance expansion policy. Primary result shows that there is an increase in traffic accidents and fatalities for those younger adults as a result of the ACA dependent coverage expansion.
|
50 |
RediClinic : an evaluation of a convenient care clinic in a shifting medical landscapeEdwards, Lauren Jean 17 February 2011 (has links)
This paper offers in-depth look at the convenient care/retail clinic industry in the context of today’s changing medical landscape with specific focus on Texas-based RediClinic. In addition to a detailed analysis of RediClinic, this paper proposes detailed advertising, marketing and social media recommendations that will aid RediClinic in bolstering its brand image and expanding its client base.
Every suggested tactic is framed within the rapidly changing healthcare environment present in America, and specific focus is given to the recent passing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. This paper attempts to aid RediClinic in understanding and leveraging its most important strengths: its strong position within the Texas market, and its service to those who are currently uninsured. / text
|
Page generated in 0.1077 seconds