No description available.

ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This study examines the impact of the extended degree program on the students admitted to these programs. The extended degree program offers students an alternative access route to higher education institutions. The program is aimed at students from former disadvantage school environments that have the potential to be successful in their studies. The literature review shows that the programs are successfully implemented over the world. The literature also indicates that if learners are longer exposed to a specific subject, they perform better in this subject. This statement is specifically investigated in this study because it is one of the extended degree program`s building blocks – give students more exposure to a specific subject and they have a better chance to achieve success in that subject. In answering the main research question “What impact does the extended degree program has on both the student and institution.”, both quantitative and qualitative data were collected. Quantitative data used in this study were the final marks and throughput rates of students. Qualitative data was obtained through interviews with students in the program. Although the findings of this study are context specific, it contributes to the growing knowledge and better understanding of the impact that the extended degree program has on the student and university. The two main findings of this work were: i) The academic performance of students in the extended degree program improved in relation to the performance of students in the mainstream. ii) The performance of students in the extended degree programs justifies the existence of the programs at the University of Stellenbosch. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie studie ondersoek die impak wat die verlengde graadprogram het op studente wat tot hierdie programme toegelaat word. Die verlengde graadprogram bied ʼn alternatiewe toegangsroete aan studente tot hoëronderwysinstellings. Die programme is gemik op leerders uit ʼn voorheen benadeelde skoolomgewing wat die potensiaal toon om suksesvol in hulle studies te wees. Die literatuurstudie toon dat die programme met sukses oor die wêreld geïmplementeer word. Die literatuur toon ook aan dat leerders wat langer aan ʼn spesifieke vak blootgestel word, beter in die vak presteer. Hierdie stelling is spesifiek in die studie ondersoek, want dit is een van die verlengde graadprogram se boustene – gee studente langer blootstelling aan ʼn spesifieke vak sodat hulle ʼn beter kans het om sukses in die vak te behaal. Om die hoofnavorsingsvraag “Watter impak het die verlengde graadprogram op beide die student en instansie.” te beantwoord, is beide kwantitatiewe- en kwalitatiewe data ingesamel. Kwantitatiewe data wat gebruik is in die studie is die prestasiepunte en deurvloeisyfers van studente. Kwalitatiewe data is verkry deur onderhoude te voer met studente in die verlengde graadprogram. Alhoewel die bevindinge van dié studie konteks spesifiek is, dra dit by tot die groeiende kennis en beter verstaan van die impak wat die verlengde graadprogram het op die student en die universiteit. Die twee belangrikste bevindinge van hierdie werk is: i) Die akademiese prestasie van studente in die verlengde graadprogram verbeter ten opsigte van studente in die hoofstroom. ii) Die prestasie van die studente in die verlengde graadprogramme regverdig die voortbestaan van die programme aan die Universiteit van Stellenbosch.

伍美蓮. / 呈交日期: 2003年1月. / 論文(哲學博士)-香港中文大学, 2002. / 參考文獻 (p. 227-241). / 中英文摘要. / Cheng jiao ri qi: 2003 nian 1 yue. / Electronic reproduction. Hong Kong : Chinese University of Hong Kong, [2012] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Electronic reproduction. Ann Arbor, MI : ProQuest Information and Learning Company, [200-] System requirements: Adobe Acrobat Reader. Available via World Wide Web. / Mode of access: World Wide Web. / Wu Meilian. / Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Lun wen (zhe xue bo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2002. / Can kao wen xian (p. 227-241).

In this philosophical and practical-critical inquiry, I address two significant and closely related problems - whether and how those involved in the enterprise of education conceptualise a need for educational change, and the observed resistance of school cultures to change efforts. I address the apparent lack of a clear, coherent and viable theory of learning, agency and change, capable of making explicit the need, substantive nature and means of educational change. Based on a meta-analysis of numerous theories and perspectives on human knowing, learning, intelligence, agency and change, I synthesise a 'Dynamic Paradigm of Learning and Change', characterised by fifteen Constructs. I argue that this more viable Paradigm is capable of informing both design and critique of systemic curriculum and assessment policies, school organisation and planning models, professional learning and pedagogical practice, and student learning and action. The Dynamic Paradigm of Learning and Change contrasts with the assumptions reflected in the prevailing culture of institutionalised education, and I argue that dominant views of knowledge and human agency are both theoretically and practically non-viable and unsustainable. I argue that the prevailing culture and experience of schooling contributes to the formation of assumptions, identities, dispositions and orientations to the world characterised by alienation. The Dynamic Paradigm of Learning and Change also contrasts with the assumptions reflected in some educational reform efforts recently promoted at system level in Queensland, Australia. I use the Dynamic Paradigm as the reference point for a formal critique of two influential reform programs, Authentic Pedagogy and the New Basics Project, identifying significant limitations in both the conceptualisation of educational ends and means, and the implementation of these reform agendas. Within the Dynamic Paradigm of Learning and Change, knowledge and learning serve the individual's need for more adaptive or viable functioning in the world. I argue that students' attainment of knowledge of major ways in which others in our culture organise experience (interpret the world) is a legitimate goal of schooling. However, it is more viable to think of the primary function of schooling as providing for the young inspiration, opportunities and support for purposeful doing, and for assisting them in understanding the processes of 'action scheme' change to make such doing more viable. Through the practical-critical components of the inquiry, undertaken in the context of the ferment of pedagogical and curricular discussion and exploration in Queensland between 1999 and 2003, I develop the Key Abilities Model and associated guidelines and resources relating to forms of pedagogy, curriculum organisation and assessment consistent with the Dynamic Paradigm of Learning and Change. I argue the importance of showing teachers why and how their existing visions and conceptions of learning and teaching may be inadequate, and of emphasising teachers' conceptions of learning, knowing, agency and teaching, and their identities, dispositions and orientations to the world, as things that might need to change, in order to realise the intent of educational change focused on transformational student outcomes serving both the individual and collective good. A recommendation is made for implementation and research of a school-based trial of the Key Abilities Model, informed by and reflecting the Dynamic Paradigm of Learning and Change, as an important investment in the development and expression of ‘authentic' human intelligence.

Organizations leading education reform of the 1980's have challenged teacher education programs at colleges and universities across the nation to improve the subject matter content preparation of teachers. Past methods of program development and techniques to assess teacher's knowledge competence have been one-sided in their approach. New research studies on expert vs novice teachers show that expert teachers are more efficient in carrying out standard patterns of instruction. This nation's mathematics community has engaged in a revitalization of mathematics curricula. Traditional mathematics is being transformed to become a powerful science. Using the growing body of research, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics have developed standards for improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. Oregon's Department of Education has also established standards to meet the needs of a changing mathematics curricula and the challenges of a changing society. This study identified the specific content knowledge taught in the mathematics curricula within colleges and universities which offer four, five or fifth year teacher education programs. It then compared these findings against teacher identified origins of elementary, middle and high school teachers' mathematics content knowledge relative to the Essential Learning Skills of Oregon. It was found that teachers' content knowledge of the Essential Learning Skills of Oregon was not directly related to their preparation as teachers; at the elementary and high school levels, there was no direct relationship found between teachers' degrees and their teaching assignment; there was no apparent relationship between teachers' knowledge of the Essential Learning Skills of Oregon and graduation from an Oregon college or university; there was no apparent relationship between teachers' lack of knowledge of the Essential Learning Skills of Oregon and graduation from a non-Oregon college or university. / Graduation date: 1990

Not available / text

The literature in education is conspicuously lacking in any meaningful or sustained discussion of the body's role in education. This thesis suggests that body and mind do not mutually exclude one another but rather, they are the two aspects that, together, form the whole person. Paradox is a key concept here because it offers a vision of reality that brings together "apparent opposites" into a tensed relationship thereby creating a framework that allows for the integration of body and mind into a cohesive whole. This thesis argues that myth is an expression of humankind's paradoxical nature, and that the hero myth, in particular, points to a path that leads to the embodiment of paradox, and thus to wholeness. This, however, requires a journey into the depths of the body in order to get in touch with the body and the entire range of its feelings. It is further argued that this process reconnects us to our body. To embody paradox, therefore, signifies the integration of body and mind into a unified whole. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

The purpose of the study was to compile, measure, and then compare the judgments of four groups--undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and administrators--on the goals of Ball State University. This work investigated the groups' judgments, as to what the University's goals "are" presently (perceived goals) and also what the University's goals "should be" (preferred goals). In order to examine these judgments, three related hypotheses were constructed. These hypotheses were designed to test for the amount. of agreement on goals between these four groups. The method used in proving the hypotheses was a statistical technique, analysis of variance, which computed the differences between squares of means.The null forms of the hypotheses are stated below:Hypothesis I. There will be no significant difference in how undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and administrators perceive the priority given to 20 goals by the University presently. (Is scores)Hypothesis II. There will be no significant difference in how undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and administrators perceive what goals the University ought to emphasize. (Should Be scores)Hypothesis III. There will be no significant difference in how undergraduate students, graduate students, faculty, and administrators perceive what priority now is given to certain goals and what they think ought to be given. (Should Be-Is Discrepancy)The study's population of 60 undergraduate students, 33 graduate students, 40 faculty, and 14 administrators was randomly selected. The groups responded to the Institutional Goals Inventory (IGI), a questionnaire prepared by the Educational Testing Service.The data were obtained from a sample of 147 questionnaires. The IGI had 90 goal statements. Each of these goal statements was rated on a 5 point scale from 1 to 5, five being of extremely high importance and 1 of no importance or not applicable. Ten goal statements were ungrouped; the remaining 80 were grouped in 20 goal areas comprising 4 goal statements each. Then, means of the responses in each goal area were computed for each of the 4 responding groups, "Is" and "Should Be" means were derived from the entire population, Next, the "Is" means were subtracted from the "Should Be" means, providing discrepancy scores.An F-ratio of 2.68 was used as the point for significant difference between the "Is" means, the "Should Be" means, and for the difference between these two means for each of the 4 responding groups. The F -ratio was computed at the .05 level using these factors; (1) the difference between and within the means of the four groups, (2) sum of squares, (3) a degree of freedom of 3/143, and (4) mean squares. The statistical analysis was done by the computer.Null Hypothesis I, II, and III were supported or rejected separately for each of the study's 20 goal areas. These 20 goals were broken into two categories; Output and Process goals. Output goalswere the substantive objectives, such as intellectual development, vocational preparation, or public service programs. Process goals were the objectives that related for the most part to educational process and campus climate.The research did not provide a clear-cut answer to Hypothesis I. In 11 cases Hypothesis I held true; in 9 cases it did not. In 6 out of 13 output goals the hypothesis proved correct and in 3 out of 7 process goals the same results obtained.There were significant differences among the groups' perception of the importance to the University of the selected goals. The administrators judged all of the 20 goals to be more important to the University than the remaining 3 groups did. The faculty judged 4 out of 20 goals to be more important to the University than did the undergraduate and graduate students. The graduate students judged 3 out of 20 goals to be more important to the University than did the undergraduates. The undergraduate students judged 17 out of the 20 goals to be more important to the University than the faculty. The administrators and the undergraduate students perceived the University as assigning more importance to goal areas than did faculty or graduate students.The research did not provide a clear-cut answer to Hypothesis II. In 11 cases Hypothesis II held true; in 9 cases it did not. In .5-out of 13 output goals the hypothesis proved incorrect and in out of the 7 process goals the same result obtained.There were significant differences among the groups' judgments concerning what importance "Should Be" assigned to selected goals. The graduate students judged 12 out of the 20 "Should Be" goal areas to be more important than the remaining 3 groups. The administrators judged 7 out of the 20 "Should Be" goals areas to be more important than the 2 remaining groups. The undergraduate students judged 1 out of the 20 "Should Be" goal areas to be more important than did the other 3 groups. The faculty judged none of the 20 "Should Be" goal areas to be more important than the other 3 groups.The research most nearly supported Hypothesis III. In 14 cases Hypothesis III held true; in 6 cases it did not. In 3 out of the process goals the hypothesis proved incorrect and in 3 out of the 7 process goals the same result obtained.There were significant discrepancies among the groups' judgments as to the current importance of goals at Ball State University, compared to what they judged "Should Be" their importance. In all 20 goal areas there was always a gap between a lower "Is" score, reflecting perceptions of the present situation, and a higher "Should Be" score, reflecting hopes for another situation. This meant the discrepancy was always a positive one. The graduate students' scores revealed the greatest amount of discrepancy in 14 of 20 goal areas between what they thought the University's goals were and what they wished them to be. The faculty and undergraduate students were basically in agreement about the size of the discrepancy between what they believed the goals to be and what they thought the goals should be, with only 3 out of 20 goal areas higher in discrepancy than the other groups. The administrators had no discrepancy factor higher than any of the other groups. The graduate students saw the University as different from what they wished it to be by a considerable margin, while the administrators perceived the priorities of the University to be much closer to what their own would be.

The purpose of the study was to determine how, and to what extent, operation under a Management-by-Objectives (MBO) system has affected administrative units and individual participants in public two-year community colleges.The research was planned to answer the following questions:1. How often were goal-setting meetings and progress evaluation meetings held?2. What were the effects of a Management-by-Objectives system on formal contacts-between subordinates and superiors as perceived by public community college administrators?3. What were the effects of goal-setting conferences between subordinates and superiors as perceived by public community college administrators?4. How does the Management-by-Objectives program effect participation of community college administrators in decision-making?5. What were the effects of MBO on communication within the organization?6. How did the Management-by-Objectives program affect individual and organizational performance?7. What factors might be responsible for both the negative and positive attitudes toward a Management-by-Objectives system as perceived by public community college administrators?8. What was the scope and intensity of management training needed to implement a Management-byObjectives program as perceived by public community college administrators?9. Which variables (on the questionnaire given) were found" to be statistically significant predictors of administrative attitudes toward a Management-by-Objectives program?Administrators from a total of 32 public two-year community colleges that were operating under a Management-by-Objectives system indicated a willingness to participate in the study. Chief administrators of the 32 colleges aggregately supplied the names of 283 administrators to be surveyed through confidential questionnaires. The instruments were coded to identify the various administrative units: code one represented the Administrative Affairs Unit; code two the Community Services Unit; code three the Instructional Affairs Unit; code four the Student Services Unit, code five the Research and Development Unit, and code six represented Community College Presidents. A total of 200 instruments (71 percent) were returned.Tables were formulated to summarize responses to individual items according to the administrative units. Total responses, percent of totals, and average response for each administrative unit were reported in each table. An average response figure was calculated in order to provide a measure of the relative strength of responses in each administrative unit.Statistical processing of the data consisted of the Pearson product-moment coefficient of correlation to determine whether relationships existed between selected variables. Also, a stepwise multiple-regression analysis employing the attitude of the administrator toward the MBO system as a dependent variable was utilized to identify which, if any, among the 25 independent variables selected served as significant predictors of administrative attitudes toward an MBO program. In both statistical processes an .05 level was established as significant.Major findings permitted the following conclusions to be drawn:1. Attitudes of community college administrators toward the MBO program were favorable.2. Negative reactions toward the MBO program were perceived to be-generated by increased time pressures, increased paperwork, and difficulty in setting educational objectives.3. The variables identified which serve as significant predictors of administrator attitudes toward the MBO program were:a. Effective as a means for planning and organizing work for which an administrator is accountable.b. Effective as a means for evaluating work performance.c. Effective in improving satisfaction with being more a part of decisions.d. Effective in improving the attitudes of the superior toward the Management-by-Objectives program as perceived by subordinates.

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of goal setting upon teachers at the Metropolitan School District of Washington Township, Marion County.A descriptive research design was used to obtain data pertaining to the effects of goal setting upon teachers to determine the efficacy of goal setting in relation to improvement of instruction. Five hundred sixty-three teachers responded to a thirty-five item questionnaire. The data obtained were analyzed for the combined responses and for discrepancies between respondent sub-groups i.e., elementary non-tenure, elementary tenure, secondary non-tenure, secondary tenure teachers.The relationship between goal setting and improvement of instruction was not clear. Teachers were not committed to goal setting as a means to improve instruction. The benefits derived by goal setting were not understood by teachers. Teachers responsibly worked toward goal attainment as a requirement of the teacher evaluation process rather than viewing goal setting 'is a vehicle to increase teacher effectiveness.Teacher acceptance of goal setting led to satisfaction and resistance or hostility led to dissatisfaction. The efficacy of goal setting as a motivational means to improve instruction was to relation to the attitude of individual teachers.Teachers spent approximately four hours, less than one full teacher workday, for conducting a self-diagnosis, identifying and writing goals, and conferencing in relation to goals. Four hours were not enough time to effect instructional improvement.Teachers and evaluators did not perceive a relationship between goal setting and application of in-classroom teaching learning knowledge or changes in instructional practices. No relationship existed between goal setting and application of in-classroom teaching-learning knowledge or changes in instructional practices.Teachers indicated receiving infrequent help from evaluators relative to in-classroom teacher practices. No relationship existed between goal setting and teachers receiving help from evaluators relative to in-classroom teacher practices.The amount of supervisory influence was increased in relation to the amount of evaluator competence perceived by teachers. Effective supervisory skills enhanced the benefits derived from goal setting for individual teachers.The influence of the evaluator over a teacher appeared to be the result of power and the capacity to reward or punish. Tenured teachers, especially secondary, were less influenced by the power base of the evaluator.Teachers appeared to be in conflict between needs of teachers to be helped at becoming more adept with needs to be perceived as competent, for which teachers must be evaluated. Teacher resistance and hostility, especially tenured secondary teachers, toward evaluators was related to goal setting.Evaluators assumed passive roles in relation to goal setting resulting in negative evaluations by teachers of the interpersonal relationships between teachers and evaluators. The relationship between teachers and evaluators was not improved via goal setting.A dichotomous relationship existed between goal setting and the total teacher evaluation plan. Evaluators experienced a role conflict between desiring to help and having to evaluate teachers.Goal setting communication between teachers and evaluators flowed multi-directionally with teachers controlling the primary input and influence for goals. Teacher ownership for goals was considered critical in regard to motivation toward goal attainment. However, the passive, almost casual, behavior of the evaluators reported by teachers appeared detrimental to goal setting.