• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1398
  • 1014
  • 380
  • 88
  • 62
  • 59
  • 45
  • 38
  • 21
  • 19
  • 14
  • 12
  • 11
  • 8
  • 8
  • Tagged with
  • 3658
  • 1140
  • 591
  • 492
  • 382
  • 356
  • 300
  • 251
  • 249
  • 248
  • 229
  • 224
  • 217
  • 215
  • 209
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
31

Stability of biophotonic Eschrechia coli 0157:H7 and its effectiveness as a validation tool in beef purge sampling methodologies

Broadway, Paul Randall, II 06 August 2011 (has links)
BiophotonicE. coli O157:H7(BEC) was evaluated for growth and stability to evaluate the effectiveness of BEC as a tool to validate pathogen reduction interventions. Escherichia coliO157:H7 containing Xen14 and pAK1 lux plasmids were monitored for growth and stability over 10 d at 2.2˚C and 37˚C. Concentration of BECat 2.2˚C remained constant (P> 0.05) but photonic emissions (RLU/s) changed (P<0.05), resulting in a positive correlation between RLU/s and CFU/mL (P< 0.01; r=0.5718). BEC grown at 37˚C yielded no change after a decrease on day 2 (P>0.05). In phase I, purge was monitored for photonic emission after trim was inoculated with BEC. BECwas found at 4 h in Combo C and D. Phase II purge collection used inoculated trim indicative of trim used currently in the beef industry stored in simulated combos. Neither photonic emission nor CFU’s were enumerated in phase II.
32

Message from A-MOST 2020 Chairs

Hierons, Rob, Nunez, Manuel, Pretschner, Alexander, Lefticaru, Raluca 08 December 2021 (has links)
yes / Welcome to the 16th edition of the Advances in Model-Based Testing Workshop (A-MOST 2020) held on March 23rd, 2020 in Porto as part of ICST 2020, the IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation.
33

The Examination for the Professional Practice of Psychology (EPPP): An Examination of Criterion Validity

Saldana, Samantha 07 1900 (has links)
The Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP) is a requirement for licensure as a psychologist across the entire United States as well as in numerous territories and provinces. Despite many longstanding criticisms and findings of bias, the EPPP is being expanded (adding a second, putatively competency-based, portion to the overall exam) and rebranded as the Enhanced EPPP. A review of literature reveals strong skepticism surrounding these developments, particularly with respect to the issue of criterion validity. The current study sought to examine the criterion validity of the EPPP by (1) drawing archival competency assessment data from existing measures (convergent validity) and (2) gathering new neurocognitive and emotional intelligence data, along with demographic data (discriminant validity), with copies of EPPP score reports from individuals who have recently taken the EPPP. Competency ratings did not significantly positively correlate with EPPP scores and, instead, indicated the opposite trend. Analyses also revealed a significant relationship between ethnicity and exam scores, with White individuals scoring higher than other ethnicities. Finally, performance on neurocognitive tests significantly positively correlated with exam scores, indicating that general test taking abilities play a larger role than abilities and competencies unique to the psychology field. Given the gatekeeping role the EPPP plays in the profession of psychology, external validation of the EPPP is of vital importance and was not supported in this study. Implications for the exam and the field are discussed.
34

Model Development, Synthesis and Validation Using the Modeler's Assistant

Narnur, Soumya 14 August 1999 (has links)
This thesis discusses 'Modeler's Assistant', an interactive graphics tool which aids in the rapid development of VHDL models. The tool provides modeling, test bench generation, simulation, synthesis and validation features. The 'Process Model graph' which has representations for the concurrent processes is used as the basis for Modeler's Assistant. Test generation environment is integrated into the tool. A range of test bench options are provided to the user. The tool interfaces to 'Synopsys' VHDL analyzer, graphics debugger and synthesis tools. Validation of the behavioral model versus the synthesized structural model is also discussed. A detailed programming manual with many examples is provided for the benefit of the user. / Master of Science
35

Validation of the Tranquillity Rating Prediction Tool (TRAPT): comparative studies in UK and Hong Kong

Watts, Gregory R., Marafa, L. 23 August 2017 (has links)
Yes / The Tranquillity Rating Prediction Tool (TRAPT) has been used to make predictions of the quality of tranquility in outdoor urban areas using two significant factors i.e. the average level of anthropogenic noise and the percentage of natural features in view. The method has a number of applications including producing tranquillity contours that can inform decisions regarding the impact of new anthropogenic noise sources or developments causing visual intrusion. The methodwas intended for use in mainly outdoor areas and yet was developed using responses from UK volunteers to video clips indoors. Because the volunteers for this study were all UK residents it was important to calibrate responses for other ethnic groups who may respond differently depending on cultural background. To address these issues further studies were performed in Hong Kong using the same video recording played back under the same conditions as the study in the UK. The HK study involved recruiting three groups i.e. residents fromHong Kong, Mainland China and a diverse group from 16 different nations. There was good agreement between all these groups with average tranquillity ratings for the different locations differing by less than one scale point in most cases. / The studywas supported by the Bradford Centre for Sustainable Environments at the University of Bradford and by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (RGC/GRF. CUHK 449612)
36

Proposal Of A Validation Model For Instructional Simulators

Sancar, Hatice 01 October 2010 (has links) (PDF)
There were two aims of the study. First one was to validate a truck simulator designed to train truck drivers on economic fuel consumption. Second one was to develop a simulator validation model for instructional simulators. This aim merged as a result of literature review since there is a controversy on the categorization and application of validation approaches. To accomplish two aims, the simulator validation approaches were categorized according to their descriptions in the literature, namely, &ldquo / Behavioral&rdquo / , &ldquo / Face&rdquo / and &ldquo / Instructional&rdquo / validation and combined in the current study. Blending Mixed Methods Research Design and Designed Case Formative Research Design were employed together in order collect data. To validate the simulator and investigate the main characteristics of instructional validation process, 110 truck drivers from a logistics and transportation company participated to the economic fuel consumption training. The data were collected in two parts as during the training and 5 months after the training. Both quantitative and qualitative research approaches were used to collect data. To analyze the qualitative data, open coding analysis method were employed and quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS statistics software. According to the study results, although the Truck Simulator did not represent the real model in 100% percent or had some usability problems, it was valid in overall since it did what it was supposed to do during the training. Also, the results of the study showed that the validation determination should have been done according to the instructional goals / not the reality or usability of it.
37

Validation of software for the calculation ofaerodynamic coefficients : with a focus on the software package Tornado

Lopez Pereira, Ramon January 2010 (has links)
<p>Several programs exist today for calculating aerodynamic coefficients that with some simplificationsprovide fast approximations of the values for a real aircraft.Four different programs were analyzed for this report: Tornado, AVL, PANAIR and a handbook-typepreliminary method. In addition, ANSYS CFX was used for airfoil validation. For calculation of the zerolift drag, an approximation was computed in order to calculate the remaining values that were notcalculated by the software: drag contribution for fuselages, nacelles and some horizontal stabilizersand fins.Different types of aircraft were selected for trial: two commercial aircraft (Boeing 747-100 and 777-300), a TF-8A research airplane (with area rule application: some additions were made to the fuselageto prevent large variations in the cross-section when the contribution of the wing is added), a LockheedConstellation C-69 used as a military cargo airplane, a Boeing Stratocruiser used by the USAF withtwo configurations (basic and bomber), and an Aero Commander 680 Super, similar to a Cessna 162.Two airfoils (NACA2412, 0012) were also analyzed, to investigate the limitations of software designedfor three-dimensional calculations.The accuracy of the results showed that the validity of the software depends on the planform of theaircraft, as well as the simulation parameters Mach number and Reynolds number. The shape of thewing caused some of the methods to have serious difficulties in converging to valid results, orincreased the simulation time beyond acceptable limits.</p> / <p>Numera finns det olika program för beräkning av de aerodynamiska koefficienterna från en modellmed vissa förenklingar som ger en snabb approximation av värdena för ett verkligt flygplan.Fyra olika program har analyserats för denna rapport: Tornado, AVL, PANAIR och en handbokbaserad preliminär metod. Dessutom användes ANSYS CFX för validering av vingprofiler . Vidberäkningen av noll-lyft motståndet, en approximation användes för de återstående delarna som inteberäknas av de andra metoderna: motståndsbidraget från flygkroppar, gondoler och vissa horisontellastabilisatorer och fenor.Olika flygplaner har testats: två trafikflygplan (Boeing 747-100 och 777-300), ett TF-8Aforskningsflygplan (med area regel användning: några tillägg gjordes på flygkroppen för att tvärsnitteninte har stora variationer när bidraget från vingen läggas), ett Lockheed Constellation C-69, ett BoeingStratocruiser som används av USAF i två konfigurationer (den vanliga och bombplan), och ett AeroCommander 680 Super, som liknar ett Cessna 162. Två vingprofiler (NACA 2412, 0012) analyseradesockså, för att kontrollera begränsningarna av programmen avsedd för tredimensionella beräkningar.Riktigheten av resultaten visade att giltigheten av programmen beror på formen av flygplanernasvingar, samt de simulationernas parametrar: Mach nummer och Reynolds nummer. Formen på vingenorsakade några av de metoderna att ha stora svårigheter med konvergensen till giltiga resultat, ellerökat simulering tid över acceptabla gränser.</p>
38

Validation of software for the calculation ofaerodynamic coefficients : with a focus on the software package Tornado

Lopez Pereira, Ramon January 2010 (has links)
Several programs exist today for calculating aerodynamic coefficients that with some simplificationsprovide fast approximations of the values for a real aircraft.Four different programs were analyzed for this report: Tornado, AVL, PANAIR and a handbook-typepreliminary method. In addition, ANSYS CFX was used for airfoil validation. For calculation of the zerolift drag, an approximation was computed in order to calculate the remaining values that were notcalculated by the software: drag contribution for fuselages, nacelles and some horizontal stabilizersand fins.Different types of aircraft were selected for trial: two commercial aircraft (Boeing 747-100 and 777-300), a TF-8A research airplane (with area rule application: some additions were made to the fuselageto prevent large variations in the cross-section when the contribution of the wing is added), a LockheedConstellation C-69 used as a military cargo airplane, a Boeing Stratocruiser used by the USAF withtwo configurations (basic and bomber), and an Aero Commander 680 Super, similar to a Cessna 162.Two airfoils (NACA2412, 0012) were also analyzed, to investigate the limitations of software designedfor three-dimensional calculations.The accuracy of the results showed that the validity of the software depends on the planform of theaircraft, as well as the simulation parameters Mach number and Reynolds number. The shape of thewing caused some of the methods to have serious difficulties in converging to valid results, orincreased the simulation time beyond acceptable limits. / Numera finns det olika program för beräkning av de aerodynamiska koefficienterna från en modellmed vissa förenklingar som ger en snabb approximation av värdena för ett verkligt flygplan.Fyra olika program har analyserats för denna rapport: Tornado, AVL, PANAIR och en handbokbaserad preliminär metod. Dessutom användes ANSYS CFX för validering av vingprofiler . Vidberäkningen av noll-lyft motståndet, en approximation användes för de återstående delarna som inteberäknas av de andra metoderna: motståndsbidraget från flygkroppar, gondoler och vissa horisontellastabilisatorer och fenor.Olika flygplaner har testats: två trafikflygplan (Boeing 747-100 och 777-300), ett TF-8Aforskningsflygplan (med area regel användning: några tillägg gjordes på flygkroppen för att tvärsnitteninte har stora variationer när bidraget från vingen läggas), ett Lockheed Constellation C-69, ett BoeingStratocruiser som används av USAF i två konfigurationer (den vanliga och bombplan), och ett AeroCommander 680 Super, som liknar ett Cessna 162. Två vingprofiler (NACA 2412, 0012) analyseradesockså, för att kontrollera begränsningarna av programmen avsedd för tredimensionella beräkningar.Riktigheten av resultaten visade att giltigheten av programmen beror på formen av flygplanernasvingar, samt de simulationernas parametrar: Mach nummer och Reynolds nummer. Formen på vingenorsakade några av de metoderna att ha stora svårigheter med konvergensen till giltiga resultat, ellerökat simulering tid över acceptabla gränser.
39

Bean Validation in JAXB / Bean Validation pro JAXB

Valový, Marcel January 2014 (has links)
Currently, there is no solution providing automatic validation of objects in the problem of solving Object-to-XML Impedance Mismatch. The author chose Java SE specification JAXB for Object-to-XML mapping and Java EE specification Bean Validation for validation of JavaBean objects. This thesis focuses on the interconnection of the two specifications and creation of a new specification Bean Validation in JAXB providing automatic validation at the object level during the process of marshalling and unmarshalling. This specification also provides means for mapping XML Restrictions and Facets to Bean Validation constraints. In this thesis author presents the design of Bean Validation in JAXB facility specification, its reference implementation, written by author, and users and programmers guide.
40

Etudes sociocognitives des besoins fondamentaux : échelles de mesure et application sociocognitive pour une population d'étudiant de l'université / Sociocognitive studies for fundamental needs : scales of measure and application sociocognitive for a population of student of the university

Salama Younes, Mareï 14 December 2011 (has links)
Cette thèse avait pour principal objectif d’explorer le caractère normatif de trois besoins dits fondamentaux : le besoin d’évaluer, le besoin de cognition et le besoin de clôture. Pour atteindre cet objectif, il nous a fallu dans un premier temps une validation rigoureuse des trois échelles de mesures habituellement utilisées : Need for Cognition Scale, Need to Evaluate Scale et Need for Closure Scale . Dans cette perspective, trois études distinctes relatives à ce processus de validation ont été effectuées. Une version française épurée pour chacune des échelles a été établie (partie 2, chapitres 1, 2 et 3). Puis à la manière dont cela est réalisé dans les travaux portant sur la normativité de l’internalité, nous avons eu recourt aux paradigmes des juges et d’identification pour tester notre hypothèse de normativité des besoins en vue de poser les premiers jalons d’une conception socio-normative des besoins. Selon le paradigme des juges, les résultats obtenus montrent que les individus évaluent mieux les individus manifestant une forte adhésion aux besoins d’évaluer, de cognition ou de clôture. En revanche, si le paradigme d’identification confirme nos hypothèses de normativité des besoins d’évaluer et de cognition, il manque à apporter un soutien évident à l’hypothèse de normativité du besoin de clôture / The main objective of this thesis was to explore the normative character of three needs known as fundamental: the need for cognitive, need to evaluate and need for closure. To achieve this goal, we initially needed a rigorous validation of the three scales usually used: Need for Scale Cognition, Need to Evaluate Scale and Need for Closure Scale. From this point of view, three distinct studies relative to this process of validation were carried out. A French version purified for each scale was established (part 2, chapters 1, 2 and 3).Then with the way in which that is carried out in work relating to the normatively of the internality, we had resorts to the Judges and identification paradigms to test our assumption of normatively of the needs in order to pose the first stakes of a socio-normative design of the needs. According to the Judges paradigm, the results obtained show that the individuals evaluate the individuals best expressing a strong adhesion with the needs to evaluate, of cognition or closure. On the other hand, if the identification paradigm confirms our assumptions of normatively of the needs to evaluate and cognition, it misses to give an obvious support for the assumption of normatively of the need for closure

Page generated in 0.129 seconds