1 |
Animal welfare Societal perspectives and the path to permanent change /Horton, Janet Linn. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.) -- University of Texas at Arlington, 2009.
|
2 |
A study of stated concerns of secondary school students on selected animal welfare problems.Sanders, Gilbert Otis. January 1974 (has links)
Thesis (Ed.D.)--University of Tulsa, 1974. / Bibliography: leaves 67-71.
|
3 |
Tierschutz und Gesetz : dogmatisch und kritisch dargestellt /Lehner, Michael. January 1929 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Friedrich-Alexanders-Universität Erlangen, 1929. / Includes bibliographical references (p. vii-viii).
|
4 |
But can they suffer? the militant wing of the contemporary animal rights movement and agenda-setting in congress /McMurray, Kimberly. January 2009 (has links)
Thesis (M.A.)--Villanova University, 2009. / Political Science Dept. Includes bibliographical references.
|
5 |
The behaviour and welfare of early-weaned pigsWaran, Natalie Kay January 1991 (has links)
No description available.
|
6 |
Effect of husbandary on immune responses, and implications for the assessment of welfare in calvesMacKenzie, Alexander Mackay January 1994 (has links)
No description available.
|
7 |
The effect of temperament and environment on the behaviour of the pigDunne, Laura Maria January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
8 |
Faecal glucocorticoid as a welfare indicator in chickensAndrea Elizabeth, Lord January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
9 |
The welfare of broiler chickens reared under commercial conditionsHall, Abigail January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
10 |
Investigating non-anthropocentric approaches to human-animal interactions in science: towards improved welfare of animals used in wildlife researchField, Kate A. 01 May 2019 (has links)
Drawing on anthropocentric, ecocentric and biocentric worldviews, I examine the use of research animals as a case to investigate human-animal interactions in science. Specifically, I investigate a case of potential tensions between eco- and biocentric worldviews by examining oversight mechanisms of animal care during research. Despite abundant focus on responsible care of laboratory animals, I argue that inattention to the treatment of wildlife constitutes an ethical shortcoming in contemporary animal research. I review significant shortcomings in legal and institutional oversight and argue for the relatively rapid and transformational potential of editorial oversight in preventing inhumane treatment to vertebrates studied in the field and outside the direct supervision of institutions. Straightforward changes to animal care policies in journals, which the analysis of 206 journals suggests are in many cases absent (34%), weak, incoherent, or neglected by researchers, could provide a practical, effective, and rapidly imposed safeguard against unnecessary suffering. The ARROW (Animal Research: Reporting on Wildlife) guidelines, an original contribution to the present work, coupled with strong enforcement, could result in significant changes to how animals involved in wildlife research are treated. The research process would also benefit. In many cases, reliability, validity, and replicability of data requires animal subjects to be physically, physiologically, and behaviorally unharmed. Accordingly, publication of methods that contravenes animal welfare principles risks perpetuating inhumane approaches and bad science. I conclude by assessing whether paradigms have shifted from anthropocentric to non-anthropocentric approaches to interacting with animals in research, and offer practical and conceptual suggestions for ensuring humane human-animal interactions. / Graduate / 2020-04-05
|
Page generated in 0.054 seconds