Autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion (ATAD) of sludge has been used to produce class A biosolids. With stringent EPA guidelines, more and more municipalities are looking to use this process for digestion of sludge. However the large polymer costs associated with dewatering these sludges has made the use of this technology unfavorable. Several studies have been conducted in the past which have looked into the mechanism leading to such a poor dewatering of sludge. Some of these studies have attributed the release of protein and polysaccharide during the high temperature digestion to be responsible for the poor dewatering. However the exact mechanism leading to the poor dewatering is still not totally clear. Laboratory scale studies were conducted to evaluate the mechanism leading to the poor dewatering of these sludges and also to be able to economically condition these sludges. ATAD sludge samples were collected from ATAD processing facilities in Ephrata, PA, Cranberry, PA, Titusville, FL and College Station, TX. The research included experiments evaluating the protein and polysaccharide concentrations in solution, cations and anions, iron and aluminum, zeta potential and capillary suction time. It was found that during digestion large amounts of protein and polysaccharide were released which were in the colloidal range, and the dewatering of each of these sludges became poorer as the amount of protein and polysaccharide in the solution increased. The release of protein and polysaccharide was related to the monovalent to divalent cation ratio and the iron and aluminum concentration in the sludge. Also during the digestion process, the pH of the sludge increased appreciably and the divalent cations precipitated out. The zeta potential of the ATAD digested sludge was also found to be positive. Different chemical coagulants were used to condition the sludge, but even with high polymer doses the dewatering of the sludge was not satisfactory. A combination of iron (or cationic polymer) followed by anionic polymer was found to improve the dewatering to a desired level. The use of this combination of sludge conditioning also provides an economical solution to the problem of dewatering. The role of iron in improving the dewatering of the sludges was found to be important, with the sludge dewatering being better for sludges with a high iron content. The combination of high pH, divalent cation precipitation, iron deficiency and biopolymer release all contribute to the poor dewatering of ATAD sludge. / Master of Science

O projeto consistiu em avaliar o emprego de polímeros catiônicos e aniônicos de diferentes pesos moleculares como auxiliares de filtração no tratamento de águas de abastecimento proveniente de mananciais com alto grau de eutrofização com vistas a possibilitar a otimização da remoção de material particulado e minimização da evolução da perda de carga. O aparato experimental é composto, principalmente, por 4 filtros em escala piloto de alta taxa do tipo camada profunda e fluxo descendente por gravidade operados em paralelo. Os filtros possuem 5 m de altura e diâmetro interno de 150 mm. O procedimento experimental foi dividido em três etapas, execução de ensaios de fluidificação e expansão do leito dos filtros e utilização de polímeros catiônicos e de polímero aniônico como auxiliares de filtração. A primeira etapa teve como objetivo definir parâmetros de dimensionamento do sistema de lavagem em contra-corrente com ar e água e nas duas etapas seguintes foram realizados os ensaios de filtração a uma taxa de 500 m³/m²/dia, com a utilização dos polímeros com três dosagens diferentes. Os polímeros utilizados foram CA-2577, CA-2581, CD-2592 e N1986. Estes possuem estrutura e pesos moleculares variáveis, de forma que o trabalho tivesse uma maior amplitude. Os valores médios de turbidez, para a primeira etapa dos ensaios de filtração, foram de 2,36 ± 0,28 UNT e 1,12 ± 0,21 UNT para água bruta e decantada, respectivamente, 0,26 ± 0,07 UNT para o filtro F1 com antracito, 0,25 ± 0,08 UNT para o filtro F3 com antracito e adição de polímero, 0,29 ± 0,08 UNT para o filtro F2 com areia e 0,26 ± 0,08 UNT para o filtro F4 com areia e adição de polímero. Para a segunda etapa dos ensaios de filtração os valores médios de turbidez foram de 2,03 ± 0,36 UNT para água bruta, 0,80 ± 0,21 UNT para água decantada, 0,09 ± 0,03 UNT para o filtro F1, sem adição de polímero, e 0,15 ± 0,04, 0,16 ± 0,03 e 0,10 ± 0,04 UNT para os filtros F2, F3 e F4, respectivamente, todos com adição de polímero. Os resultados experimentais possibilitaram concluir que a adoção do antracito como material filtrante do tipo camada única e profunda apresenta a vantagem de permitir uma menor velocidade ascensional de água de lavagem para uma determinada expansão quando comparado a um filtro de areia de idêntica granulometria. A aplicação dos polímeros catiônicos e do polímero aniônico como auxiliares de filtração não proporcionou para nenhuma dosagem utilizada melhora significativa no comportamento dos filtros. Uma eventual melhora ou piora foi insignificante e estava ligada à qualidade da água decantada. No que diz respeito à perda de carga, os filtros com antracito tiveram carreiras de filtração mais longas quando comparados com os de areia, independente da utilização dos polímeros. / The project was to evaluate the use of anionic and cationic polymers of different molecular weights as filter aids to treat drinking water treatment of surface water sources with high degree of eutrophication, particularly with regard to particulate matter removal optimization and head loss rate minimization. The experimental apparatus was composed of four pilot scale, deep bed, down flow rapid gravity filters, operated in parallel. The filter columns were 5 m high, had inner diameter of 150 mm. The experimental procedure was divided in three stages, conduction of media fluidization and media expansion tests and cationic and anionic polymers application as filter aid. The first stage aims was to define design parameters for the filter backwashing system with water and air and in the two next phases the tests were conducted at a filtration rate of 500 m³/m²/day, with the use of polymers with three different dosages. The polymers tested were CA- 2577, CA-2581, CD-2592 and N1986. They have different structure and molecular weights, thus making wider the array of possibilities tested. The average values of turbidity, for the first stage of testing filtration, were 2.36 ± 0.28 and 1.12 ± 0.21 NTU for raw and settled water, respectively, 0.26 ± 0.07 NTU to the filter F1 with anthracite, 0.25 ± 0.08 NTU for the filter F3 with anthracite and addition of polymer, 0.29 ± 0.08 NTU for the filter F2 with sand and 0.26 ± 0.08 NTU for the filter F4 with sand and the addition of polymer. For the second stage of testing of the filter values of turbidity were 2.03 ± 0.36 NTU for raw water, 0.80 ± 0.21 NTU for settled water, 0.09 ± 0.03 for the filter F1, without the addition of polymer, and 0.15 ± 0.04, 0.16 ± 0.03 and 0.10 ± 0.04 NTU for filters F2, F3 and F4, respectively, all with the addition of polymer. The experimental results led us to conclusion that the adoption of anthracite as single media in deep bed filtration presents the advantage of a lower ascent backwash water velocity for any given bed expansion as compared to deep bed filtration through sand with the same granulometric characteristic. Application of cationic and anionic polymers as filter aids did not lead to any significant improvement in the behavior of pilot scale filters, regardless of applied polymer dosage. Any eventual improvement or worsening was not significant and was closely related to the settled water quality. Regarding the head loss, the filters with anthracite had longer filtration careers when compared to sand, regardless the use of polymers.

O projeto consistiu em avaliar o emprego de polímeros catiônicos e aniônicos de diferentes pesos moleculares como auxiliares de filtração no tratamento de águas de abastecimento proveniente de mananciais com alto grau de eutrofização com vistas a possibilitar a otimização da remoção de material particulado e minimização da evolução da perda de carga. O aparato experimental é composto, principalmente, por 4 filtros em escala piloto de alta taxa do tipo camada profunda e fluxo descendente por gravidade operados em paralelo. Os filtros possuem 5 m de altura e diâmetro interno de 150 mm. O procedimento experimental foi dividido em três etapas, execução de ensaios de fluidificação e expansão do leito dos filtros e utilização de polímeros catiônicos e de polímero aniônico como auxiliares de filtração. A primeira etapa teve como objetivo definir parâmetros de dimensionamento do sistema de lavagem em contra-corrente com ar e água e nas duas etapas seguintes foram realizados os ensaios de filtração a uma taxa de 500 m³/m²/dia, com a utilização dos polímeros com três dosagens diferentes. Os polímeros utilizados foram CA-2577, CA-2581, CD-2592 e N1986. Estes possuem estrutura e pesos moleculares variáveis, de forma que o trabalho tivesse uma maior amplitude. Os valores médios de turbidez, para a primeira etapa dos ensaios de filtração, foram de 2,36 ± 0,28 UNT e 1,12 ± 0,21 UNT para água bruta e decantada, respectivamente, 0,26 ± 0,07 UNT para o filtro F1 com antracito, 0,25 ± 0,08 UNT para o filtro F3 com antracito e adição de polímero, 0,29 ± 0,08 UNT para o filtro F2 com areia e 0,26 ± 0,08 UNT para o filtro F4 com areia e adição de polímero. Para a segunda etapa dos ensaios de filtração os valores médios de turbidez foram de 2,03 ± 0,36 UNT para água bruta, 0,80 ± 0,21 UNT para água decantada, 0,09 ± 0,03 UNT para o filtro F1, sem adição de polímero, e 0,15 ± 0,04, 0,16 ± 0,03 e 0,10 ± 0,04 UNT para os filtros F2, F3 e F4, respectivamente, todos com adição de polímero. Os resultados experimentais possibilitaram concluir que a adoção do antracito como material filtrante do tipo camada única e profunda apresenta a vantagem de permitir uma menor velocidade ascensional de água de lavagem para uma determinada expansão quando comparado a um filtro de areia de idêntica granulometria. A aplicação dos polímeros catiônicos e do polímero aniônico como auxiliares de filtração não proporcionou para nenhuma dosagem utilizada melhora significativa no comportamento dos filtros. Uma eventual melhora ou piora foi insignificante e estava ligada à qualidade da água decantada. No que diz respeito à perda de carga, os filtros com antracito tiveram carreiras de filtração mais longas quando comparados com os de areia, independente da utilização dos polímeros. / The project was to evaluate the use of anionic and cationic polymers of different molecular weights as filter aids to treat drinking water treatment of surface water sources with high degree of eutrophication, particularly with regard to particulate matter removal optimization and head loss rate minimization. The experimental apparatus was composed of four pilot scale, deep bed, down flow rapid gravity filters, operated in parallel. The filter columns were 5 m high, had inner diameter of 150 mm. The experimental procedure was divided in three stages, conduction of media fluidization and media expansion tests and cationic and anionic polymers application as filter aid. The first stage aims was to define design parameters for the filter backwashing system with water and air and in the two next phases the tests were conducted at a filtration rate of 500 m³/m²/day, with the use of polymers with three different dosages. The polymers tested were CA- 2577, CA-2581, CD-2592 and N1986. They have different structure and molecular weights, thus making wider the array of possibilities tested. The average values of turbidity, for the first stage of testing filtration, were 2.36 ± 0.28 and 1.12 ± 0.21 NTU for raw and settled water, respectively, 0.26 ± 0.07 NTU to the filter F1 with anthracite, 0.25 ± 0.08 NTU for the filter F3 with anthracite and addition of polymer, 0.29 ± 0.08 NTU for the filter F2 with sand and 0.26 ± 0.08 NTU for the filter F4 with sand and the addition of polymer. For the second stage of testing of the filter values of turbidity were 2.03 ± 0.36 NTU for raw water, 0.80 ± 0.21 NTU for settled water, 0.09 ± 0.03 for the filter F1, without the addition of polymer, and 0.15 ± 0.04, 0.16 ± 0.03 and 0.10 ± 0.04 NTU for filters F2, F3 and F4, respectively, all with the addition of polymer. The experimental results led us to conclusion that the adoption of anthracite as single media in deep bed filtration presents the advantage of a lower ascent backwash water velocity for any given bed expansion as compared to deep bed filtration through sand with the same granulometric characteristic. Application of cationic and anionic polymers as filter aids did not lead to any significant improvement in the behavior of pilot scale filters, regardless of applied polymer dosage. Any eventual improvement or worsening was not significant and was closely related to the settled water quality. Regarding the head loss, the filters with anthracite had longer filtration careers when compared to sand, regardless the use of polymers.