Spelling suggestions: "subject:"anthropogenics"" "subject:"anthropometrics""
1 |
Sloterdijk e o lugar do homem no humanismo p?s-metaf?sicoSantos, Luiz Roberto Alves dos 17 December 2013 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:12:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
LuizRAS_TESE.pdf: 1325717 bytes, checksum: 2f8c5c06b3469d3f4c644f8e13bf4fbc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-12-17 / This work starts from the principle that the word humanism has been currently used to
advocate certain behaviors or ways of acting which had been constituted for more than
2500 years, mainly in what refers to the most basic human values, which are clearly
validated without any questioning. Humanism has been seen continually as a stone of
civility touch. Thus, in 1999, the philosopher Peter Sloterdijk presented a conference in
Baviera entitled Rules for the Human Zoo, whose subtitle was clear that it dealt with an
answer to Martin Heidegger s text Letter on Humanism, basically showing that civility
is necessarily bound to human domestication. So, the present work is split in three
chapters. The first one aims to set the cultural and metaphysical bases of humanism.
The second one will adopt an approach about what we will call epistolary humanism
and its corollaries. Besides, in the third chapter, we will compose theoretical statements
to the Heideggerian criticism against humanism and the post humanist contemporary
proposition, as well as about the anthropotechnics. We can state that these two elements
are considered as anthropological fundamentals of humanism and post humanism, and
by understanding their mentioned historical relationship from their biological and
ontological assumptions. Therefore, this work, which has been presented here, when it
tries to map humanism under the theoretical influence of Sloterdijk, it distinguishes
itself precisely by realizing the coherence with which he aims at diagnosing the
directions of the contemporary humanism / O labor aqui apresentado parte do princ?pio de que o termo humanismo ? usado
hodiernamente para salvaguardar certos comportamentos ou formas de agir constitu?das
h? mais de 2500 anos, sobretudo no que tange aos valores humanos mais b?sicos, os
quais s?o axiomaticamente validados, sem quaisquer contesta??es. O humanismo ?
visto continuamente como pedra de toque da civilidade. Destarte, em 1999, o fil?sofo
Peter Sloterdijk apresentou uma confer?ncia na Baviera, intitulada Regras para o
Parque Humano, cujo subt?tulo deixava claro que se tratava de uma resposta ao texto de
Martin Heidegger, Carta sobre o Humanismo, basicamente mostrando que a civilidade
est? estritamente vinculada ? domestica??o humana. Nestes termos, o presente trabalho
? dividido em tr?s cap?tulos. No primeiro, pretende estabelecer os fundamentos culturais
e metaf?sicos do humanismo. No segundo cap?tulo, far? uma abordagem sobre aquilo
que chamaremos de humanismo epistolar e seus corol?rios. Por fim, no terceiro
cap?tulo, teceremos asser??es te?ricas ? cr?tica heideggeriana ao humanismo e ?
proposta p?s-humanista contempor?nea; assim como a respeito da rela??o entre
converg?ncia midi?tica e antropot?cnicas, esses dois elementos tomados como
fundamentos antropol?gicos do humanismo e do p?s-humanismo e entendendo a citada
rela??o historicamente, a partir de seus pressupostos biol?gicos e ontol?gicos. Portanto,
o trabalho aqui apresentado, ao tentar mapear o humanismo sob a influ?ncia te?rica de
Sloterdijk, distingue-se precisamente por conseguir perceber a coer?ncia com que ele
pretende diagnosticar os rumos do humanismo contempor?neo
|
Page generated in 0.0592 seconds