本論文為地域文學視野下的李玉研究。李玉（1611? - 1711後），字玄玉，蘇州派、中國戲曲史上之代表作家。上世紀二十年代以來，李玉研究於前人學者的筆耕下已取得豐碩的成績。然而當「現實精神」、「教化指向」與「平民色彩」一再成為研究蘇州派的關鍵詞，地域元素之於作家的影響仍有待爬梳。本論文追溯了「地」於李玉戲曲生產，即意念生成、形諸創作、再現場上的過程中，所飾演之各種角色；亦探討了李玉與當地文化、觀眾間千絲萬縷的互動與反饋。 / 論文共分為七章。第一章梳理了李玉研究的發展脈絡，提出了個人的關注問題與研究視野。論文第二章結合蘇州的科舉文化、家班文化、「市隱」文化，對李玉的生平行事與交遊進行重讀，指出「久居蘇州」可謂重省其創作的重要鑰匙。第三至六章從作家生平考察，轉移至文本細續。第三章結合「一人永占」四劇（《一捧雪》、《人獸關》、《永團圓》、《占花魁》）探討地緣於李玉早期創作的痕跡，以觀照作家日後的發展脈絡。第四章探討李玉代表作《清忠譜》中，身份認同與歷史書寫的問題，重新審視了「蘇州」於劇中所鋪演的著名歷史事件──明天啟六年的「開讀之變」，以及歷史循環發展中所扮演的角色。第五章追蹤了蘇州士人黃向堅萬里尋親復歸蘇州後的事態發展（1653 1661），繼而討論當地民眾的情感力量如何轉化為作家編寫傳奇《萬里圓》的資源。論文第六章具有李玉接受史研究的性質，以《萬里圓．打差》為個案分析，從橫向與縱向角度探討李玉劇作脫離創作的當下後，與戲曲機制、舞台反饋互動的一面。筆者選擇了「政治意識」作為關鍵詞，分析了劇中使用的方言（蘇白）與服色的問題。第七章概括各章重點，並為本課題的後續發展作出展望。 / 本論文透過多個相互關連的個案，勾勒了「蘇州」於李玉戲曲生產所扮演的不盡相同但不容忽視的角色。面對散佈於各劇的蘇州地方掌故、地方時事、蘇白方言、地理景觀、風土人情、地方家族史，筆者一方面視之為作家與地方觀眾互動的表徵，另一方面指出，此乃為作家地域經驗與身份認同的呈現。本文在豐富學界對李玉認識的同時，希望李玉的地域性研究能在蘇州派研究、中國戲曲史研究，以及明清地域文學研究中都展現其價值。 / This thesis concerns the research on Li Yu under the perspectives of regional literary studies. Li Yu (1611? - after 1711), also referred to as Li Xuanyu, is a renowned Suzhou playwright widely recognized in the history of Chinese drama. Since 1920s, researches on Li Yu have yielded significant results. However, as “realism, “didacticism and “folk color have become the core concepts in the interpretations of the works of Suzhou playwrights, study on how regional factors have influenced these dramatists has long been omitted. This thesis tries to trace how “place shaped the production of Li Yu’s plays. In other words, the study investigates the role of “Suzhou in the formation of Li Yu’s idea, the writing of the play, and the representation including performance on stage. This research also sheds light on the connection between Li Yu and local culture, as well as the interaction between the dramatist and his audience. / This thesis consists of seven chapters. The first chapter provides a literature review on the discussion of Li Yu, explains the motivation for this work and outlines the organization of the thesis. The second chapter explicates the biographical background of Li Yu, with an introduction of imperial examinations, domestic troupes and the idea of “urban recluse, so as to illustrate the importance of Li Yu’s stay in Suzhou before re-interpreting his works. The third to the sixth chapters involve close readings of Li Yu’s texts. The third chapter focuses on Li Yu’s early plays, namely, A Handful of Snow [Yipeng xue], The Gate Separating Humans and Beasts [Renshou guan], The Everlasting Union [Yong tuanyuan], Winning the Prize Courtesan [Zhan huakui]). Through analyzing these plays, this chapter portrays how geographical and social forces affected Li Yu’s early dramas and his later works. The fourth chapter examines Li Yu’s prominent drama Registers of the Pure and Loyal [Qingzhong pu] by addressing the problem of identity and historical narratives, especially how “Suzhou was employed by the author in the famous political incident “Kaidu zhi bian, that happened in 1626, and in the cyclic recurrence of historical events. The fifth chapter illustrates the journey of Suzhou literatus Huang Xiangjian from Suzhou to Yunnan to search for his father and his return with him (1653-1661), and discerns how emotional power among local citizens contributed to the composition of Li’s play, Union Across Ten Thousand Miles [Wanli yuan]. The sixth chapter explores the reception of Li Yu’s plays, by studying the performances of Beating the Officer from Union Across Ten Thousand Miles. Since this play was staged in local theatres, how its stagecraft developed and transformed across time and space is traced in this chapter. “Political consciousness is key to understanding the costumes and Suzhou dialect used in these performances. The seventh chapter is a conclusion summarizing the above arguments and providing insights into areas that await future explorations. / Through case studies that are interrelated, this thesis demonstrates how “Suzhou was vital to Li Yu’s literary production. Living in Suzhou, Li assimilated local history, contemporary events, dialect with special idioms, geographical landscapes, folk customs, and family histories, so as to interact with the interests of local audience. On the one hand, this interaction has been revealed in my study of various dramas written by Li Yu; on the other hand, this interaction in my view, represents his self identity and local experience. The aim of this research on Li Yu is not limited to the eminent playwright. It is believed that this thesis can also provide information that contributes to the study of Suzhou playwrights, regional literature in the Ming-Qing era, as well as the history of Chinese drama. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / 陳雅君. / "2012年2月". / "2012 nian 2 yue". / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 161-172). / Abstract in Chinese and English. / Chen Yajun. / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 研究情況回顧 --- p.4 / Chapter 第二節 --- 研究方法與問題意識 --- p.11 / Chapter 第三節 --- 論文章節安排 --- p.17 / Chapter 第二章 --- 李玉生平、戲曲活動與蘇州的關係 --- p.21 / Chapter 第一節 --- 成長在申家班 --- p.22 / Chapter 第二節 --- 仕與隱 --- p.26 / Chapter 第三節 --- 戲曲創作 --- p.31 / Chapter 第四節 --- 交遊 --- p.34 / Chapter 第三章 --- 晚明蘇州之浮世繪--「一人永占」 --- p.39 / Chapter 第一節 --- 時事劇的地域性：《一捧雪》 --- p.41 / Chapter 第二節 --- 給蘇州人的寓言：《人獸關》 --- p.51 / Chapter 第三節 --- 鬧熱的蘇州社火：《永團圓》 --- p.60 / Chapter 第四節 --- 地域與時代之間：《占花魁》 --- p.65 / Chapter 第四章 --- 吳人觀吳事--《清忠譜》的蘇州史事再現 --- p.72 / Chapter 第一節 --- 《清忠譜》中的晚明蘇州開讀之變 --- p.75 / Chapter 第二節 --- 《清忠譜》中的蘇州史事再現 --- p.79 / Chapter (一) --- 「罵亦禰衡之氣」：周順昌 --- p.81 / Chapter (二) --- 晚明的要離、專諸：五人義 --- p.85 / Chapter (三) --- 「時間錯誤」下的諸生朱祖文 --- p.90 / Chapter (四) --- 開放式場景中的蘇州史事：〈鬧詔〉 --- p.91 / Chapter (五) --- 對蘇州命運之關懷：〈蔭吳〉與〈塗本〉 --- p.94 / Chapter (六) --- 流變中的蘇州史事：〈弔墓〉 --- p.95 / Chapter 第三節 --- 《清忠譜》的迴響 --- p.97 / Chapter 第五章 --- 蘇州孝子尋親記──《萬里圓》的時事書寫 --- p.100 / Chapter 第一節 --- 黃向堅萬里尋親事於蘇州的傳播(1653-1661) --- p.102 / Chapter (一) --- 黃向堅《尋親紀程》、《滇還日記》與「尋親圖冊」 --- p.102 / Chapter (二) --- 李玉《萬里圓》傳奇 --- p.106 / Chapter 第二節 --- 《萬里圓》中的時事再現：家國、忠孝與空間 --- p.107 / Chapter (一) --- 忠孝、家國的交織與深化 --- p.108 / Chapter (二) --- 空間與回憶：蘇州地域經驗的深化 --- p.113 / Chapter (三) --- 亂世中的家族經驗 --- p.117 / Chapter (四) --- 孝的普世性：孝子尋親故事的互涉 --- p.118 / Chapter 第三節 --- 《萬里圓》作為場上之曲的迴響 --- p.120 / Chapter (一) --- 《綴白裘》的〈跌雪〉與三溪 --- p.124 / Chapter (二) --- 晚清舞台上的〈打差〉 --- p.125 / Chapter 第六章 --- 李玉戲曲的再生產--從《萬里圓打差》說起 --- p.127 / Chapter 第一節 --- 《萬里圓.打差》的政治意識 --- p.129 / Chapter 第二節 --- 《綴白裘》之《清忠譜鞭差》與吳梅鈔本《清忠譜.打差》 --- p.138 / Chapter 第三節 --- 王蒸籠於《翡翠園》的回歸 --- p.147 / Chapter 第四章 --- 餘論：朱素臣戲曲的再生產 --- p.153 / Chapter 第七章 --- 結語 --- p.156 / 參考書目

No description available.

No description available.

The ordering of concept classes under PAC reducibility is nonlinear, even when restricted to particular concrete examples. We construct two effective concept classes of incomparable PAC degrees to show that there exist incomparable PAC degrees, analogous to incomparable Turing degrees. The non-learnability of concept classes in the PAC learning model is explained by the existence of PAC incomparable degrees. It was necessary to deal with the size of an effective concept class thus we propose a method to compute the size of the effective concept class using Kolmogorov complexity. To define the jump operator for PACi degrees the join of effective concept classes is constructed and explores the possibility of embedding known degrees to PACi or PAC degrees. If an embedding exists it will enable proving properties of known degrees for PACi and PAC degrees without explicitly proving them.

The purpose of this thesis is to analyze and discuss the relationship between the images and texts concerning Amazons and warrior-women in the collected works of Christine de Pizan. It evaluates Christine's interpretation of the ancient story in light of her career as an author and publisher, and it compares her imagery to other representations of Amazons and warrior-women. This study indicates that Christine reworked the myth in a way that reflects her positive of women and her desire to influence the queen of France, Isabeau de Baviere, who was the original owner of the manuscript.

No description available.

M.A. (Latin) / This study is focused on the different ways the character of the Emperor Nero is depicted by the biographer Suetonlus and the historiographer Tacitus. The study is Introduced with an historical survey of the life of Nero. Thereupon a discussion follows on the life experiences of the authors, Suetonius and Tacitus, as well as the different style and genre used by each, and suggestions on how their writings could have been influenced by these factors. Two aspects of Nero's life are discussed at length, namely his relationship with his mother (and issues relating to that). as well as his interest in and practising of the arts (focusing on Nero as a poet, singer and charioteer). The discussion of these topics is done in the following manner: firstiy Suetonius' account of the events are given, followed by the account by Tacitus. These versions are then compared and where different, the candidate suggests possible reasons for the difference of opinion or presentation between the authors. Various characteristics of the Emperor Nero are referred to. The main conclusions can be categorised into three sections: - First and foremost the authors had different life experiences. Suetonius held various secretarial positions at the court of Caesar Hadrian which SUbsequently influenced his writings. He Was not however a senator or interested In politics and military affairs, which explains the fact that he does not write about political upheavals and does not contribute political motivations for certain actions of characters under discussion. Tacitus on the contrary, was a senator during the reign of Domitian. The atrocities committed by the Emperor and the slowly diminishing power of the Senate influenced the mind and writings of Tacitus to a great extent.

陳頌文. / "2002年8月". / 論文 (哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2002. / 參考文獻 (leaves 127-133) / 附中英文摘要. / "2002 nian 8 yue". / Chen Songwen. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2002. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 127-133) / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Chapter 第一章 --- 文學史和文學批評史上的初唐四傑 --- p.1 / Chapter 第一節 --- 問題的提出 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二節 --- 「四傑」名稱的由來 --- p.2 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文學史上的「四傑」 --- p.7 / Chapter 第四節 --- 文學批評史上的「四傑」 --- p.8 / Chapter 第二章 --- 貞觀至武周文學背景和文學思想發展 --- p.11 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論 --- p.11 / Chapter 第二節 --- 貞觀年間朝廷的文學宣言 --- p.12 / Chapter (1) --- 貞觀年間君臣論文的性質 --- p.12 / Chapter (2) --- 貞觀年間朝廷的文學思想´ؤ´ؤ以史家文論爲主 --- p.15 / Chapter (2.1) --- 史家對六朝文學的評價與總結 --- p.15 / Chapter (2.2) --- 史家論文的空間 --- p.17 / Chapter (2.3) --- 史家文論的意義 --- p.19 / Chapter 第三節 --- 貞觀至武周的文學硏究槪況 --- p.21 / Chapter (1) --- 類書和總集 --- p.21 / Chapter (2) --- 《文選》硏究 --- p.24 / Chapter (3) --- 詩學硏究 --- p.25 / Chapter (3.1) --- 上官儀 --- p.25 / Chapter (3.2) --- 元兢 --- p.27 / Chapter (3.3) --- 崔融 --- p.28 / Chapter 第四節 --- 貞觀至武周文人干求與入仕情況 --- p.29 / Chapter (1) --- 以文章進身的問題 --- p.30 / Chapter (2) --- 以文章進用的大臣仕途之升降 --- p.32 / Chapter (3) --- 王府的文學風氣 --- p.34 / Chapter 第三章 --- 王勃文學思想析論 --- p.35 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ王勃生平及著作槪述 --- p.35 / Chapter 第二節 --- 可供考察文學思想的篇章背景分析 --- p.36 / Chapter (1) --- 〈平臺秘略論 〉、〈平臺秘略贊〉：王府修撰的意見 --- p.36 / Chapter (2) --- 〈上吏部裴侍郎啓〉：參選士子的意見 --- p.37 / Chapter (3) --- 詩賦序文之言論：翰墨之客的意見 --- p.39 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文論文本分析 --- p.40 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質與功用 --- p.40 / Chapter (1.1) --- 「甄明大義，矯正末流」、「緣情體物」與「詩以見志」 --- p.40 / Chapter (1.2) --- 文學與王府 --- p.43 / Chapter (1.3) --- 文學與自然 --- p.44 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學作品的要求及規範 --- p.45 / Chapter (2.1) --- 「氣陵雲漢，字挾風霜」辨 --- p.45 / Chapter (2.2) --- 「甄明大義，矯正末流」辨 --- p.48 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的評價 --- p.53 / Chapter (4) --- 寫作態度 --- p.56 / Chapter (5) --- 小結 --- p.59 / Chapter 第四節 --- 王通與王勃 --- p.60 / Chapter 第四章 --- 楊炯文學思想析論 --- p.64 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ楊炯生平及著作槪述 --- p.64 / Chapter 第二節 --- 〈王勃集序〉析論 --- p.64 / Chapter (1) --- 〈王勃集序〉的寫作時間 --- p.65 / Chapter (2) --- 〈王勃集序〉的內容分析 --- p.68 / Chapter (2.1) --- 〈王勃集序〉與王勃文學變革 --- p.69 / Chapter (2.1.1) --- 從「龍朔變體」看王勃文學變革的對象 --- p.69 / Chapter (2.1.2) --- 從王勃之志看王勃文學變革的可能性 --- p.72 / Chapter (2.1.3) --- 〈王勃集序〉對王勃硏究的參考價値 --- p.75 / Chapter (2.1.4) --- 小結 --- p.76 / Chapter 第三節 --- 楊炯的文學思想 --- p.76 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質及作用 --- p.76 / Chapter (1.1) --- 文學與禮樂 --- p.76 / Chapter (1.2) --- 文學與抒情酬唱 --- p.77 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學的要求與規範 --- p.77 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的批評 --- p.79 / Chapter (3.1) --- 唐以前的文學 --- p.79 / Chapter (3.2) --- 隋唐以來的文學 --- p.80 / Chapter (4) --- 小結 --- p.82 / Chapter 第五章 --- 盧照鄰文學思想析論 --- p.83 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ盧照鄰生平及著作槪述 --- p.83 / Chapter 第二節 --- 可供考察文學思想的篇章背景分析 --- p.84 / Chapter (1) --- 〈駙馬都尉喬君集序〉 --- p.84 / Chapter (2) --- 〈南陽公集序〉 --- p.84 / Chapter (3) --- 〈樂府詩集序〉 --- p.86 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文本分析 --- p.88 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質與功用 --- p.88 / Chapter (1.1) --- 文學與政治 --- p.88 / Chapter (1.2) --- 「安可默而無述」 --- p.89 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學作品的要求和規範 --- p.90 / Chapter (2.1) --- 「立體不拘於一塗」 --- p.90 / Chapter (2.2) --- 「聽歌曲而知亡」 --- p.93 / Chapter (2.3) --- 「妙諧鐘律」 --- p.94 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的評價 --- p.96 / Chapter (3.1) --- 對唐以前文學的評價和態度 --- p.96 / Chapter (3.1.1) --- 〈雅〉、〈頌〉 --- p.96 / Chapter (3.1.2) --- 屈宋 --- p.97 / Chapter (3.1.3) --- 兩漢 --- p.99 / Chapter (3.1.4) --- 魏晉 --- p.99 / Chapter (3.1.5) --- 南朝 --- p.100 / Chapter (3.2) --- 對貞觀文臣的批評 --- p.101 / Chapter (3.3) --- 對古今文士評論文學的意見 --- p.102 / Chapter (4) --- 創作態度 --- p.102 / Chapter (5) --- 小結 --- p.104 / Chapter 第六章 --- 駱賓王文學思想析論 --- p.105 / Chapter 第一節 --- 緒論´ؤ´ؤ駱賓王生平及著作槪述 --- p.105 / Chapter 第二節 --- 可供考察文學思想的篇章背景分析 --- p.106 / Chapter (1) --- 上長官書信 --- p.106 / Chapter (1.1) --- 〈和道王閨情詩啓〉 --- p.106 / Chapter (1.2) --- 〈上吏部裴侍郎書〉、〈上吏部侍郎帝京篇序〉 --- p.106 / Chapter (1.3) --- 〈與程將軍書〉 --- p.107 / Chapter (2) --- 飲宴酬唱之作 --- p.108 / Chapter (3) --- 個人抒懷之作 --- p.108 / Chapter 第三節 --- 文論內容分析 --- p.109 / Chapter (1) --- 文學的性質及功用 --- p.109 / Chapter (1.1) --- 事、物、情與文 --- p.109 / Chapter (1.2) --- 文學與求仕 --- p.111 / Chapter (2) --- 對文學的要求及規範：雅與俗的取捨問題 --- p.113 / Chapter (3) --- 對歷代文學的評價 --- p.115 / Chapter (3.1) --- 兩漢以前 --- p.115 / Chapter (3.2) --- 兩漢 --- p.117 / Chapter (3.3) --- 魏晉 --- p.117 / Chapter (3.4) --- 南朝 --- p.118 / Chapter (4) --- 小結 --- p.118 / Chapter 第七章 --- 總結 --- p.120 / 參考書目 --- p.127 / 附錄一 --- p.132

Doctorat en philosophie et lettres / info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished

This thesis addresses Constantine's developments of the Roman province of Palaestina. It analyzes two important Christian bishops, Eusebius of Caesarea and Cyril of Jerusalem, and one nameless Christian traveler, the Bordeaux pilgrim, to illuminate how fourth-century Christians understood these developments. This study examines the surviving writings of these Christian authors: the Bordeaux Itinerary, Cyril's Catechetical Lectures, and Eusebius's Ecclesiastical History, Onomasticon, Preparation of the Gospel, Proof of the Gospel, and the Life of Constantine, and the archaeological remains of several Constantinian basilicas to interpret their views of the imperial attentions that were being poured into the land. Together these accounts provide views of fourth-century Palaestina and Jerusalem that when combined more fully illuminate how Christians understood Constantine's Holy Land policy. This study focuses on Constantine's developments of the city of Jerusalem, primarily the so-called Triad of Churches (The church of the Nativity, the Eleona, and the Holy Sepulchre) built in and around the city. It likewise considers the countryside of Palaestina outside of Jerusalem. While some Christians were resistant to the developments of Jerusalem, our sources reveal how many Christians supported, or at least desired to experience, the newly developing Christian Holy Land. This thesis argues that most of the discrepancies over the city of Jerusalem between our sources, especially Eusebius and Cyril, developed from long-standing political tensions between the cities of Caesarea and Jerusalem. The Bordeaux pilgrim, on the other hand, traveled across the Roman Empire to see and experience the developing sites throughout the land with no interest in local political debates. With this added perspective we can see how Christians, separated from the positions of church fathers, experienced the developing Holy Land.