MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression through RNA interference. These small RNAs enact gene silencing by forming a RNA-inducing silencing complex together with the effector protein Argonaute. The function of the Argonautes in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum is not yet fully understood. In this study, we look closer at Argonaute B by investigating if it is possible to extract the protein from the cells by the addition of a polypeptide protein tag called 3xFlag. At the same time, we also look into if Argonaute B is important for cell growth. Sequences of the 3xFlag tag with or without the Argonaute B gene (agnB) attached had previously been cloned into a vector and transformed into Dictyostelium discoideum cell. The 3xFlag::agnB sequence was confirmed in wild type and agnB knock-out strains through polymerase chain reaction. We then verified the expression of the fusion protein in the cells by western blot. The cell growth was measured by how the number of cells changed over time. The experiment suggested that Argonaute B is important for growth. Our result show that the construct 3xFlag::agnB sequenced had correctly been transformed into the strains and is highly expressed under tested conditions. We could also see that Argonaute B is an important factor in cell growth.

Tesis por compendio / Los viroides, los agentes infecciosos más simples de la escala biológica, están constituidos por una molécula circular de RNA monocatenario de aproximadamente 250-400 nucleótios (nt) que no codifica proteína alguna. A pesar de esta simplicidad estructural, los viroides son capaces de replicarse autónomamente, moverse sistémicamente y en muchos casos causar enfermedades en sus plantas huéspedes. Las infecciones producidas por viroides representativos generan la acumulación de pequeños RNAs viroidales (vd-sRNAs) de 21-24 nt con características similares a los pequeños RNA interferentes (siRNAs), la huella dactilar del silenciamiento mediado por RNA. La identificación de los vd-sRNAs implica que los viroides son diana de la primera barrera de silenciamiento mediado por RNA, formada por las RNasas ‘Dicer-like’ (DCLs). Para examinar si los vd-sRNAs se unen a las proteínas AGOs —el componente clave del complejo RISC (‘RNAinduced silencing complex’) que constituye la segunda barrera del silenciamiento mediado por RNA— hojas de Nicotiana benthamiana infectadas por el viroide del tubérculo fusiforme de la patata (PSTVd) se agroinfiltraron con nueve de las diez proteínas AGOs de Arabidopsis thaliana. Inmunoprecipitaciones a partir de los halos agroinfiltrados y análisis ‘Western-’ y ‘Northern-blot’ han mostrado que todas las AGOs se expresaron y, a excepción de AGO6, AGO7 y AGO10, unieron vd-sRNAs: AGO1, AGO2 y AGO3 los de 21 y 22 nt, mientras que AGO4, AGO5 y AGO9 también mostraron afinidad por los de 24 nt. La secuenciación masiva mostró que las AGO1, AGO2, AGO4 y AGO5 agroexpresadas unen los PSTVd-sRNAs en función de su tamaño y nucleótido 5’-terminal, y que los perfiles de los correspondientes vd-sRNAs cargados en las AGOs adoptan una distribución específica a lo largo del genoma viroidal. La agroexpresión de AGO1, AGO2, AGO4 y AGO5 en hojas de N. benthamiana infectadas con PSTVd atenuó la acumulación de los RNAs genómico viroidales, indicando que éstos, o sus precursores, también son diana de RISC. En contraste con los ribovirus, la infección de PSTVd en N. benthamiana no afectó de forma significativa la regulación mediada por miR168 de la AGO1 endógena, que carga vd-sRNAs con especificidad similar a su homóloga de A. thaliana. Mientras se conoce bien la biogénesis de los RNA viroidales, su degradación está restringida a algunos datos que implican al silenciamiento mediado por RNA. En el curso de nuestros estudios sobre el PSTVd, hemos observado consistentemente un patrón de 6-7 RNAs subgénomicos (sgRNAs) de polaridad (+) que aparecen junto con los RNAs monoméricos circulares y lineares en berenjena, un huésped experimental de este viroide. Hibridaciones ‘Northern-blot’ con sondas de tamaño parcial y completo, mostraron que los sgRNAs (+) de PSTVd derivan de diferentes regiones del RNA genómico y que algunos son parcialmente solapantes. Parte de los sgRNAs (+) de PSTVd se observaron también en N. benthamiana y tomate, donde han pasado desapercibidos a causa de su menor acumulación. El análisis por extensión de cebador de sgRNAs (+) de PSTVd representativos excluye que sean productos de terminaciones prematuras de la transcripción, pues carecen del extremo 5’ común que cabría esperar si ésta empezara en una posición específica. Ulteriores análisis mediante 5’- y 3’-RACE indican que los sgRNAs (+) de PSTVd tienen extremos 5’-OH y 3’-P, que probablemente resultan de cortes endonucleolíticos de precursores más largos catalizados por RNasas típicas que generan este tipo de extremos. Análisis de sgRNA (-) de PSTVd, que también se acumulan en berenjena infectada, mostraron que presentan características estructurales muy similares a los sgRNA (+). Nuestros resultados proporcionan una nueva visión de cómo ocurre la degradación in vivo de los RNAs viroidales, posiblemente durante su replicación, y sugieren que síntesis y degradación de las cadenas de PSTVd están conectadas, como se ha observado en los mRNAs. / Minoia, S. (2015). Degradación in vivo de un viroide de replicación nuclear: rutas catalizadas por proteínas Argonauta cargadas con pequeños RNAs viroidales y por otras ribonucleasas que generan RNAs subgenómicos [Tesis doctoral]. Universitat Politècnica de València. https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/48553 / Compendio

Small silencing RNAs function in almost every aspect of cellular biology. Argonaute proteins bind small RNA and execute gene silencing. The number of Argonaute paralogs range from 5 in Drosophila melanogaster , 8 in Homo sapiens to an astounding 27 in Caenorhabditis elegans. This begs several questions: Do Argonaute proteins have different small RNA repertoires? Do Argonaute proteins behave differently? And if so, how are they functionally and mechanistically distinct? To address these questions, we examined the thermodynamic, kinetic and functional properties of fly Argonaute1 (dAgo1), fly Argonaute2 (dAgo2) and mouse Argonaute2 (mAGO2). Our studies reveal that in fly, small RNA duplexes sort into Argonaute proteins based on their intrinsic structures: extensively paired siRNA duplex is preferentially sorted into dAgo2 while imperfectly paired miRNA duplex is channeled into dAgo1. The sorting of small RNA is uncoupled from its biogenesis. This is exemplified by mir-277, which is born a miRNA but its extensive duplex structure licenses its entry into dAgo2. In the Argonaute protein, the small RNA guide partitions into functional domains: anchor, seed, central, 3' supplementary and tail. Of these domains, the seed initiates binding to target. Both dAgo2 and mAGO2 (more closely related to and a surrogate for dAgo1 in our studies) bind targets at astonishing diffusion-limited rates (~107–108 M−1s−1). The dissociation kinetics between dAgo2 and mAGO2 from their targets, however, are different. For a fully paired target, dAgo2 dissociates slowly (t½ ~2 hr) but for a seed-matched target, dAgo2 dissociates rapidly (t½ ~20 s). In comparison, mAGO2 does not discriminate between either targets and demonstrates an equivalent dissociation rate (t½ ~20 min). Regardless, both dAgo2 and mAGO2 demonstrate high binding affinity to perfect targets with equilibrium dissociation constants, KD ~4–20 pM. Functionally, we also showed that dAgo1 but not dAgo2 silence a centrally bulged target. By contrast, dAgo2 cleaved and destroyed perfectly paired targets 43-fold faster than dAgo1. In target cleavage, dAgo2 can tolerate mismatches, bulged and internal loop in the target but at the expense of reduced target binding affinities and cleavage rates. Taken together, our studies indicate that small RNAs are actively sorted into different Argonaute proteins with distinct thermodynamic, kinetic and functional behaviors. Our quantitative biochemical analysis also allows us to model how Argonaute proteins find, bind and regulate their targets.

No description available.

Argonaute proteins play substantial roles in post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression within RNA interference (RNAi) pathways, making them crucial subjects for research, aimed at understanding their interactions with small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and other RNAi components. This study focuses on investigating these properties of Argonaute proteins, particularly Argonaute protein A (AgnA), in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum that is renowned for its broad genetic toolbox and unique life cycle. While previous studies have examined the disruption of three Argonaute genes (agnB, agnC, agnE) and their effect on mRNA levels and small ncRNA expression, this study extends to agnA gene, which remains less studied. Key questions surrounding the influence of AgnA on the cellular processes such as the cell growth rate, development, gene expression, as well as potential targets and small ncRNA binding, remain unanswered. A well-established approach that could provide the necessary answers is the disruption of the gene through traditional homologous recombination, by insertion of a drug-resistance cassette flanked by homology arms complementary to the target locus. However, the emerging CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tool on contrary offers straightforward protocols for disruption of gene expression through efficient induction of genomic knockouts, point mutations and deletions. In this study, both approaches were applied in parallel to knockout the agnA gene, enabling comparison of knockout efficiency and further study of the growth rate, development and gene expression in the knockout strains. Moreover, important information regarding the growth patterns of both wild-type and agnE knockout strains were also elucidated, complementing the previous growth rate analyses. The obtained data from this research could provide valuable insights for future studies ofthe RNAi machinery components and particularly the function of Argonaute proteins in D. discoideum.

Small RNA silencing pathways regulate development, viral defense, and genomic integrity in all kingdoms of life. An Argonaute (Ago) protein, guided by a tightly bound, small RNA or DNA, lies at the core of these pathways. Argonaute uses its small RNA or DNA to find its target sequences, which it either cleaves or stably binds, acting as a binding scaffold for other proteins. We used Co-localization Single-Molecule Spectroscopy (CoSMoS) to analyze target binding and cleavage by Ago and its guide. We find that both eukaryotic and prokaryotic Argonaute proteins re-shape the fundamental properties of RNA:RNA, RNA:DNA, and DNA:DNA hybridization: a small RNA or DNA bound to Argonaute as a guide no longer follows the well-established rules by which oligonucleotides find, bind, and dissociate from complementary nucleic acid sequences. Counter to the rules of nucleic acid hybridization alone, we find that mouse AGO2 and its guide bind to microRNA targets 17,000 times tighter than the guide without Argonaute. Moreover, AGO2 can distinguish between microRNA-like targets that make seven base pairs with the guide and the products of cleavage, which bind via nine base pairs: AGO2 leaves the cleavage products faster, even though they pair more extensively. This thesis presents a detailed kinetic interrogation of microRNA and RNA interference pathways. We discovered sub-domains within the previously defined functional domains created by Argonaute and its bound DNA or RNA guide. These sub-domains have features that no longer conform to the well-established properties of unbound oligonucleotides. It is by re-writing the rules for nucleic acid hybridization that Argonautes allow oligonucleotides to serve as specificity determinants with thermodynamic and kinetic properties more typical of RNA-binding proteins than that of RNA or DNA. Taken altogether, these studies further our understanding about the biology of small RNA silencing pathways and may serve to guide future work related to all RNA-guided endonucleases.

Organisms employ sophisticated mechanisms to silence foreign nucleic acid, such as viruses and transposons. Evidence exists for pathways that sense copy number, unpaired DNA, or aberrant RNA (e.g., dsRNA), but the mechanisms that distinguish “self” from “non-self” are not well understood. Our studies on transgene silencing in C. elegans have uncovered an RNA surveillance system in which the PIWI protein, PRG-1, uses a vast repertoire of piRNAs to recognize foreign transcripts and to initiate epigenetic silencing. Partial base pairing by piRNAs is sufficient to guide PRG-1 targeting. PRG-1 in turn recruits RdRP to synthesize perfectly matching antisense siRNAs (22G-RNAs) that are loaded onto worm-specific Argonaute (WAGO) proteins. WAGOs collaborate with chromatin factors to maintain epigenetic silencing (RNAe). Since mismatches are allowed during piRNA targeting, piRNAs could—in theory— target any transcript expressed in the germline, but germline genes are not subject to silencing by RNAe. Moreover, some foreign sequences are expressed and appear to be adopted as “self.” How are “self” transcripts distinguished from foreign transcripts? We have found that another Argonaute, CSR-1, and its siRNAs—also synthesized by RdRP—protect endogenous genes from silencing by RNAe. We refer to this pathway as RNA-mediated gene activation (RNAa). Reducing CSR-1 or PRG-1 or increasing piRNA targeting can shift the balance towards expression or silencing, indicating that PRG-1 and CSR-1 compete for control over their targets. Thus worms have evolved a remarkable nucleic acids immunity mechanism in which opposing Argonaute pathways generate and maintain epigenetic memories of self and non-self nucleotide sequences.

During each life cycle, gametes must preserve and pass on both genetic and epigenetic information, making the germline both immortal and totipotent. In the male germline the dramatic morphological transformation of a germ cell through meiosis, into a sperm competent for fertilization, while retaining this information is an incredible example of cellular differentiation. This process of spermatogenesis is inherently thermosensitive in numerous metazoa ranging from worms to man. Here, I describe the role of two redundant AGO-class paralogs, ALG-3/4, and their small RNA cofactors, in promoting thermotolerant male fertility in Caenorhabditis elegans. alg-3/4 double mutants exhibit temperature dependent sterility resulting from defective spermiogenesis, the postmeiotic differentiation of haploid spermatids into spermatozoa competent for fertilization. The essential Argonaute CSR-1 functions with ALG-3/4 to positively regulate target genes required for spermiogenesis by promoting transcription via a small RNA positive feedback loop. Our findings suggest that ALG-3/4 functions during spermatogenesis to amplify a small-RNA signal loaded into CSR-1 to maintain transcriptionally active chromatin at genes required for spermiogenesis and to provide an epigenetic memory of male-specific gene expression. CSR-1, which is abundant in mature sperm, appears to transmit this memory to offspring. Surprisingly, in addition to small RNAs targeting male-specific genes, we show that males also harbor an extensive repertoire of CSR-1 small RNAs targeting oogenesis-specific mRNAs. The ALG-3/4 small RNA pathway also initiates silencing small RNA signals loaded into WAGO vii Argonautes, which function to posttranscripitonally silence their target mRNAs. Silencing WAGO/small RNA-complexes are present in sperm and presumably transmitted to offspring upon fertilization. Together these findings suggest that C. elegans sperm transmit not only the genome but also epigenetic activating and silencing signals in the form of Argonaute/small-RNA complexes, constituting a memory of gene expression in preceding generations.

Small RNAs are single-stranded, 18–36 nucleotide RNAs that can be categorized as miRNA, siRNA, and piRNA. miRNA are expressed ubiquitously in tissues and at particular developmental stages. They fine-tune gene expression by regulating the stability and translation of mRNAs. piRNAs are mainly expressed in the animal gonads and their major function is repressing transposable elements to ensure the faithful transfer of genetic information from generation to generation. My thesis research focused on the biogenesis of miRNAs and piRNAs using both experimental and computational strategies. The biogenesis of miRNAs involves sequential processing of their precursors by the RNase III enzymes Drosha and Dicer to generate miRNA/miRNA* duplexes, which are subsequently loaded into Argonaute proteins to form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). We discovered that, after assembled into Ago1, more than a quarter of Drosophila miRNAs undergo 3′ end trimming by the 3′-to-5′ exoribonuclease Nibbler. Such trimming occurs after removal of the miRNA* strand from pre-RISC and may be the final step in RISC assembly, ultimately enhancing target messenger RNA repression. Moreover, by developing a specialized Burrow-Wheeler Transform based short reads aligner, we discovered that in the absence of Nibbler a subgroup of miRNAs undergoes increased tailing—non-templated nucleotide addition to their 3′ ends, which are usually associated with miRNA degradation. Therefore, the 3′ trimming by Nibbler might increase miRNA stability by protecting them from degradation. In Drosophila germ line, piRNAs associate with three PIWI-clade Argonaute proteins, Piwi, Aub, and Ago3. piRNAs bound by Aub and Ago3 are generated by reciprocal cleavages of sense and antisense transposon transcripts (a.k.a., the “Ping-Pong” cycle), which amplifies piRNA abundance and degrades transposon transcripts in the cytoplasm. On the other hand, Piwi and its associated piRNA repress the transcription of transposons in the nucleus. We discovered that Aub- and Ago3-mediated transposon RNA cleavage not only generates piRNAs bound to each other, but also produces substrates for the endonuclease Zucchini, which processively cleaves those substrates in a periodicity of ~26 nt and generates piRNAs that predominantly load into Piwi. Without Aub or Ago3, the abundance of Piwi-bound piRNAs drops and transcriptional silencing is compromised. Our discovery revises the current model of piRNA biogenesis.

PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNA) are a group of 23–35 nucleotide (nt) short RNAs that protect animal gonads from transposon activities. In Drosophila germ line, piRNAs can be categorized into two different categories— primary and secondary piRNAs— based on their origins. Primary piRNAs, generated from transcripts of specific genomic regions called piRNA clusters, which are enriched in transposon fragments that are unlikely to retain transposition activity. The transcription and maturation of primary piRNAs from those cluster transcripts are poorly understood. After being produced, a group of primary piRNAs associates Piwi proteins and directs them to repress transposons at the transcriptional level in the nucleus. Other than their direct role in repressing transposons, primary piRNAs can also initiate the production of secondary piRNA. piRNAs with such function are loaded in a second PIWI protein named Aubergine (Aub). Similar to Piwi, Aub is guided by piRNAs to identify its targets through base-pairing. Differently, Aub functions in the cytoplasm by cleaving transposon mRNAs. The 5' cleavage products are not degraded but loaded into the third PIWI protein Argonaute3 (Ago3). It is believed that an unidentified nuclease trims the 3' ends of those cleavage products to 23–29 nt, becoming mature piRNAs remained in Ago3. Such piRNAs whose 5' ends are generated by another PIWI protein are named secondary piRNAs. Intriguingly, secondary piRNAs loaded into Ago3 also cleave transposon mRNA or piRNA cluster transcripts and produce more secondary piRNAs loaded into Aub. This reciprocal feed-forward loop, named the “Ping-Pong cycle”, amplified piRNA abundance. By dissecting and analyzing data from large-scale deep sequencing of piRNAs and transposon transcripts, my dissertation research elucidates the biogenesis of germline piRNAs in Drosophila. How primary piRNAs are processed into mature piRNAs remains enigmatic. I discover that primary piRNA signal on the genome display a fixed periodicity of ~26 nt. Such phasing depends on Zucchini, Armitage and some other primary piRNA pathway components. Further analysis suggests that secondary piRNAs bound to Ago3 can initiate phased primary piRNA production from cleaved transposon RNAs. The first ~26 nt becomes a secondary piRNA that bind Aub while the subsequent piRNAs bind Piwi, allowing piRNAs to spread beyond the site of RNA cleavage. This discovery adds sequence diversity to the piRNA pool, allowing adaptation to changes in transposon sequence. We further find that most Piwi-associated piRNAs are generated from the cleavage products of Ago3, instead of being processed from piRNA cluster transcripts as the previous model suggests. The cardinal function of Ago3 is to produce antisense piRNAs that direct transcriptional silencing by Piwi, rather to make piRNAs that guide post-transcriptional silencing by Aub. Although Ago3 slicing is required to efficiently trigger phased piRNA production, an alternative, slicing-independent pathway suffices to generate Piwi-bound piRNAs that repress transcription of a subset of transposon families. The alternative pathway may help flies silence newly acquired transposons for which they lack extensively complementary piRNAs. The Ping-Pong model depicts that first ten nucleotides of Aub-bound piRNAs are complementary to the first ten nt of Ago3-bound piRNAs. Supporting this view, piRNAs bound to Aub typically begin with Uridine (1U), while piRNAs bound to Ago3 often have adenine at position 10 (10A). Furthermore, the majority of Ping-Pong piRNAs form this 1U:10A pair. The Ping-Pong model proposes that the 10A is a consequence of 1U. By statistically quantifying those target piRNAs not paired to g1U, we discover that 10A is not directly caused by 1U. Instead, fly Aub as well as its homologs, Siwi in silkmoth and MILI in mice, have an intrinsic preference for adenine at the t1 position of their target RNAs. On the other hand, this t1A (and g10A after loading) piRNA directly give rise to 1U piRNA in the next Ping-Pong cycle, maximizing the affinity between piRNAs and PIWI proteins.