Submitted by Cássia Santos (cassia.bcufg@gmail.com) on 2014-09-15T11:43:03Z No. of bitstreams: 2 DissertaaoVitor G Miziara.pdf: 1069814 bytes, checksum: 3e761a42d76270f46c7705851459217a (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Luciana Ferreira (lucgeral@gmail.com) on 2014-09-15T13:41:30Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 2 DissertaaoVitor G Miziara.pdf: 1069814 bytes, checksum: 3e761a42d76270f46c7705851459217a (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2014-09-15T13:41:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 DissertaaoVitor G Miziara.pdf: 1069814 bytes, checksum: 3e761a42d76270f46c7705851459217a (MD5) license_rdf: 23148 bytes, checksum: 9da0b6dfac957114c6a7714714b86306 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-03-01 / Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES / This study aims to analyze the Mexican celebrations, particularly the Bicentenary of Independence and Centenary of Mexican Revolution’s celebrations, occurred in the year of 2010, specially those related to the government’s oficial’s visions for civic and patriotic events, that have composed the mexican’s ephemeris, searching for the understanding and to analyze the data collected in the first moment – the period that preceded the celebrations – and those collected during and after the realization of those, in order to contextualize the oficial’s visions, and confront them with another perspectives. In order to, we performed a comparison with the celebrations of the First Centenary of Independence, in 1910, from a theoretical analysis about concepts like Identity, Celebration, Memory and Uses of the Past. / O presente estudo tem por objetivo analisar as celebrações mexicanas, em especial as do Bicentenário de Independência e do Centenário da Revolução Mexicana, ocorridas no ano de 2010, sobretudo com relação às visões oficiais do governo federal para com os eventos cívicos e pátrios, que compuseram as efemérides mexicanas, buscando compreender e analisar os dados levantados no primeiro momento da pesquisa – o período que antecedeu as festas – e aqueles levantados durante e após a realização destas, de forma a contextualizar as visões oficiais, e confrontá-las com outras perspectivas. Para tanto, realizamos uma comparação com as festas do Primeiro Centenário da Independência, em 1910, a partir de uma análise teórica sobre conceitos como Identidade, Comemoração, Memória e Uso do Passado.

Entre 1869 et 2009, Napoléon Bonaparte fait l'objet de manifestations culturelles à l'occasion de la commémoration des grands moments de sa vie ou de sa carrière politique et militaire. Ces commémorations se déroulent dans des contextes politiques nationaux et internationaux différents. Sous Napoléon III, on note une certaine indifférence, voire même beaucoup de recul pour ne pas trop honorer le fondateur de la dynastie dans un contexte politique difficile pour l'Empereur du Second Empire. La Troisième République alterne entre une attitude prudente et un engagement très fort en 1921. Le moment le plus fort de ces commémorations a lieu pour le bicentenaire de la naissance, en 1969. Les autres bicentenaires, de 1993 à 2009, alternent moments de désintérêt, tensions comme celles soulevées par les polémiques de 2005, et regain de publication chez les éditeurs. Napoléon semble donc un personnage historique difficile à commémorer dans un pays où il continue pourtant d'occuper une place importante dans le paysage culturel, et ce, deux cents ans après. / Between 1869 and 2009 Napoleon Bonaparte was much commemorated through cultural events to celebrate the great periods of his life and his political or military career. Those commemorations took place within various national and international contexts. Under the reign of Napoleon the Third, there was a certain indifference, not to say a lot of reluctance to honor the founder of the dynasty, in a difficult context for the Emperor of the Second Empire. During the Third Republic that interest for Napoleon went from a restrained commitment to a very strong undeniably during the bicentenary of his birth in 1969. As for the other bicentenaries between 1993 and 2009, there were times of disinterest alternating with times of tension like that caused by the controversies in 2005, and also times of increased publishing. Napoleon can therefore be seen as a historical character, who cannot be easily commemorated, in a country where he still stands as a very important person in the cultural scene and that even two hundred years after he resigned.