Master of Science / Department of Architectural Engineering and Construction Science / Kimberly W. Kramer / Reinforced concrete is a common building material used for blast resistant design. Adding fibers to reinforced concrete enhances the durability and ductility of concrete. This report examines how adding steel fibers to reinforced concrete for blast resistant design is advantageous. An overview of the behavior of blasts and goals of blast resistant design, and advantages of reinforced concrete in blast-resistant design, which include mass and the flexibility in detailing, are included in the blast resistant design section. The common uses for fiber-reinforced concrete, fiber types, and properties of fiber reinforced concrete varying with fiber type and length, and concrete strength are discussed in the fiber-reinforced concrete section. Two studies, Very High-Strength Concrete for Use in Blast-and-Penetration Resistant Structures and Blast Testing of Ultra-High Performance Fiber and FRP-Retrofitted Concrete Slabs, are reviewed. Lastly, the cost, mixing and corrosion limitations of using steel fiber-reinforced concrete are discussed. Reinforced concrete has been shown to be a desirable material choice for blast resistant design. The first step to designing a blast resistant reinforced concrete structure is to implement proper detailing to ensure that structural failures will be contained in a way that preserves as many lives as possible. To design for the preservation of lives, a list of priorities must be met. Preventing the building from collapse is the first of these priorities. Adding steel fibers to concrete has been shown to enhance the concrete’s post-crack behavior, which correlates to this priority. The second priority is reducing flying debris from a blast. Studies have shown that the failure mechanisms of steel fiber reinforced concrete aid in reducing flying debris when compared to conventional reinforced concrete exposed to blast loading. The major design considerations in designing steel fiber reinforced concrete for blast resistant design include: the strength level of the concrete with fiber addition, fiber volume, and fiber shape. As research on this topic progresses, the understanding of these factors and how they affect the strength characteristics of the concrete will increase, and acceptance into the structural design industry through model building codes may be possible.

No description available.

Terrorism has been an international threat to high occupancy civilian structures, government buildings, and military installations for many years. Statistical data from past terrorist attacks show that transportation infrastructure has been widely targeted, and a bombing of an ordinary highway bridge is a realistic scenario. Recent threats to bridges in the U.S. confirm this concern and have caught the attention of the bridge engineering community. Given that many ordinary highway bridges in the United States support critical emergency evacuation routes, military transportation plans, and vital economic corridors, the loss of a key bridge could result in severe national security, economic, and socioeconomic consequences. Therefore, in this research, a simplified procedure is developed to predict blast loads on bridge columns, and an understanding of the mechanisms that cause damage and ultimately failure of blast-loaded reinforced concrete bridge columns is advanced. To that end, computational fluid dynamics models are constructed and validated using experimental data. These numerical models are used to characterize the structural loads experienced by square and circular bridge columns subjected to blast loads, which is followed by the formulation of a simplified load prediction procedure. Additionally, nonlinear, three-dimensional, dynamic finite element models of blast-loaded reinforced concrete bridge columns are developed and validated using qualitative and quantitative data from recent experimental tests. The results of these analyses illustrate the fact that circular columns cannot be assumed to experience less base shear demand than a square column simply because they experience less net resultant impulse. Furthermore, the column response models developed in this research are used to identify and explain the mechanisms that lead to the spalling of side cover concrete off blast-loaded reinforced concrete members observed in recent experimental tests. Therefore, the results of this research advance the understanding of the structural loads on and the resulting response of reinforced concrete bridge columns subjected to blast loads, and as such these contributions to the structural engineering community enhance the security of the U.S. transportation infrastructure. / text