Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-06-30T12:56:20Z No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MARCELO_GARCIA_DA_CUNHA_PARCIAL.pdf: 231793 bytes, checksum: 823ff734904296b7c2f15ff350b8ff4a (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-06-30T12:56:42Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MARCELO_GARCIA_DA_CUNHA_PARCIAL.pdf: 231793 bytes, checksum: 823ff734904296b7c2f15ff350b8ff4a (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-06-30T12:56:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 TES_MARCELO_GARCIA_DA_CUNHA_PARCIAL.pdf: 231793 bytes, checksum: 823ff734904296b7c2f15ff350b8ff4a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-03-21 / The internationalization and homogenization of legal relations, a phenomenon that is inexorably reflected in the framework of contemporary civil process, especially in its collective perspective, converge to the problematization of the theme concerning the recognition of foreign judgments, a procedural means that traditionally makes possible the extraterritorial circulation of judicial acts. The foreign judgment, as a rule, takes effect in Brazil after prior approval by the Superior Court of Justice, through a specific procedure in which predominantly formal requirements will be assessed, which condition the full or partial effectiveness of the sentence in the national territory. However, the jurisprudence on the subject is based on the individual demands. There is no systematic positioning regarding the request for homologation of a collective foreign judgment. The same can be said in relation to legal regulation and doctrine, since they do not present specific topical approach. The study proposal here involves class actions coming from the United States jurisdiction. In this sense, it is proposed to problematize the national jurisdictional action against a request for homologation of a sentence pronounced in the context of class action, covering theoretical and practical aspects that singles out this theme and that present difficulties in solving questions that may emerge in concrete cases. It is considered as a fundamental premise of work that the foreign collective ruling, including that resulting from the american class action, as a general rule, does not find obstacles to homologation in Brazil, since, although there is no specific rule on the matter, admissibility derives from the national process system itself, which welcomes, on a large scale, collective actions, giving them wide functionality in solving big controversy that emerge in today's society. The symmetry between the collective process systems studied (brazilian and american), overlaps with the distinctions, notably due to the characteristic concern of both to grant guarantees to the collective rights under discussion, without this implying any mitigation of the impartiality of the judicial body. This finalistic trait is projected in the homologation process resulting from class action, aiding in the equation of theoretical-practical problems that emerge from matter. / A internacionaliza??o e a homogeneiza??o das rela??es jur?dicas, fen?meno que se reflete de modo inexor?vel nos marcos do processo civil contempor?neo, notadamente na sua vertente coletiva, convergem para a problematiza??o do tema referente ao reconhecimento de senten?as estrangeiras, meio processual que tradicionalmente viabiliza a circula??o extraterritorial dos atos jurisdicionais. A senten?a estrangeira, em regra, produz efeitos no Brasil ap?s pr?via homologa??o pelo Superior Tribunal de Justi?a, mediante procedimento espec?fico no qual ser?o aferidos requisitos predominantemente formais, que condicionam a plena ou a parcial efic?cia do ato sentencial no territ?rio nacional. No entanto, a jurisprud?ncia sobre o assunto est? pautada nas demandas individuais. N?o h? um posicionamento sistem?tico a respeito de pedido de homologa??o de senten?a coletiva estrangeira. O mesmo se pode afirmar em rela??o ao regramento legal e ? doutrina, visto que n?o apresentam abordagem t?pica espec?fica. A proposta de estudo, aqui, envolve as a??es de classe provenientes da jurisdi??o norte-americana. Nesse sentido, prop?e-se problematizar a atua??o jurisdicional nacional frente a pedido de homologa??o de senten?a proferida no ?mbito de class action, abarcando aspectos te?ricos e pr?ticos que singularizam esse tema e que oferecem dificuldades na solu??o de quest?es que poder?o emergir em casos concretos. Considera-se como premissa fundamental de trabalho que a senten?a coletiva estrangeira, incluindo a resultante de a??o de classe norte-americana, como regra geral, n?o encontra ?bice ? homologa??o no Brasil, visto que, embora inexista norma espec?fica acerca da mat?ria, a admissibilidade decorre do pr?prio sistema processual nacional, que acolhe, em larga escala, as a??es coletivas, conferindo-lhes ampla funcionalidade na resolu??o de macrolides que emergem na sociedade atual. As simetrias entre os sistemas processuais coletivos estudados (brasileiro e estadunidense) se sobrep?em ?s distin??es, notadamente pela caracter?stica preocupa??o de ambos de conferir garantias aos direitos coletivos em discuss?o, sem que isso implique qualquer mitiga??o da imparcialidade do ?rg?o julgador. Esse tra?o final?stico se projeta no processo de homologa??o de decis?o resultante da class action, auxiliando no equacionamento de problemas te?rico-pr?ticos que emergem da mat?ria.