There are different phases in any design activity, one of them being concept generation. Research in automating the conceptual design process in planar mechanisms is always challenging due to the existence of many different elements and their endless combinations. There may be instances where designers arrive at a concept without considering all the alternatives. Computational synthesis aims to arrive at a design by considering the entire space of valid designs. Different researchers have adopted various methods to automate the design process that includes existence of similar graph grammar approaches. But few methods replicate the way humans’ design. An attempt is being made in the thesis in this direction and as a first step, we focus on representing and evaluating planar mechanisms designed using graph grammars. Graph grammars have been used to represent planar mechanisms but there are disadvantages in the methods currently available. This is due to the lack of information in understanding the details of a mechanism represented by the graph since the graphs do not include information about the type of joints and components such as revolute links, prismatic blocks, gears and cams. In order to overcome drawbacks in the existing methods, a novel representation scheme has been developed. In this method, labels and x, y position information in the nodes are used to represent the different mechanism types. A set of sixteen grammar rules that construct different mechanisms from the basic seed is developed, which implicitly represents a tree of candidate solutions. The scheme is tested to determine its capability in capturing the entire set of feasible planar mechanisms of one degree of freedom including Stephenson and double butterfly linkages. In addition to the representation, another important consideration is the need for an accurate and generalized evaluator for kinematic analysis of mechanisms which, given the lack of information, may not be possible with current design automation schemes. The approach employed for analysis is purely kinematic and hence the instantaneous center of rotation method is employed in this research. The velocities of pivots and links are obtained using the instant center method. Once velocities are determined, the vector polygon approach is used to obtain accelerations and geometrical intersection to determine positions of pivots. The graph grammar based analysis module is implemented in an existing object-oriented grammar framework and the results have found this to be superior to or equivalent to existing commercial packages such as Working Model and SAM for topologies consisting of four-bar loop chain with single degree of freedom. / text

Conceptual design is an early stage in the design process, in which functional requirements of a design problem are transformed into solution concepts for satisfying the requirements. It is regarded as a crucial step in design, because decisions made in this stage will strongly affect all the subsequent stages of the design process. Research evidence suggests that inspiration is useful for exploration and discovery of new solution spaces, and exploration of a wide variety of concepts increases the chances of developing more novel, and hence more creative solutions. There are various approaches to providing inspiration, e.g., creativity techniques such as trigger word technique, biomimetics such as Idea-Inspire, and computational synthesis approaches such as compositional synthesis. Computational synthesis tools are used for automated generation of concepts, which can be offered to the designer as triggers for inspiring ideation. The advantage of using solutions from computational synthesis as triggers are the following: the solutions can be produced in a relatively unbiased manner, allowing a variety of directions to be explored, and the solutions are exhaustive within the constraints of the databases or rules used, allowing a multitude of possibilities to be offered. However, computational synthesis has been traditionally used for automating solution generation, rather than creating triggers for designers’ ideation. Notwithstanding their potential for inspiring ideation, current computational synthesis approaches rarely focused on this task. One exception is FuncSION, a compositional synthesis tool, which can automatically synthesize solution concepts for mechanical devices, where a set of input and output characteristics i.e. functional requirements are provided by the user and the computer generates solutions by combining building blocks from a library to satisfy the requirements; these solutions are then used as stimuli for ideation by designers. The focus of this thesis is on evaluating and improving the effectiveness of computational synthesis in triggering ideation during conceptual design, in terms of improving the fluency and variety of the concept space produced. FuncSION has been used as the example synthesis approach on which the work has been focused. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of FuncSION in terms of fluency and variety, a method for assessing variety of a concept space is proposed, and a tool for supporting the assessment process has been developed. However, compositional synthesis research has always assumed that the building blocks are given, and has confined its focus on the process of combining the building blocks. It has not been investigated as to how such building blocks can be automatically identified. If new building blocks can be automatically identified, the resulting change in the library of building blocks would have a substantial effect on the outcomes of compositional synthesis, i.e. the triggers that can be offered to the designers for ideation, with a resulting effect on the concepts generated by the designers. Therefore, in this thesis, an automated method for building blocks synthesis has been proposed, and has been implemented as a computational tool.