Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2001. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 142-147). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.

Mechanical weeders were tested on both mineral and organic soils in 1995 and in 1996, to measure their impact on soil physical properties. The weeders were tested in three crops, carrots in mineral and organic soil, beans in mineral soil, and lettuce in organic soil. Soil bulk density and water content were measured at regular intervals during the weeder trial period, and samples for soil structural analysis were collected in the mineral soil at the beginning and at the end of each season. / No significant results were found in differences in mean weight diameters of dry and water-stable aggregates. Soil moisture did not vary significantly due to treatment. There was significant compaction caused by the first pass in the field (i.e., seeder) in all the crops at both sites in the 0--10 cm layer, and in some cases, to a depth of 25 cm. Additional field passes with the weeders caused some compaction in the tractor wheel at the 0--10 cm depth, and sometimes in the 10--25 cm layer, in all trials in mineral soil, yet no significant effects of treatments were detected in the trials at the organic soil site. No conclusions could be drawn as to the benefits and/or negative impacts of mechanical versus chemical weeding in mineral soil, with respect to the relative compaction caused by the mechanical weeders. This is because in this experiment spraying of herbicides did not involve tractor traffic in the field.

No description available.

Typescript (photocopy). / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

Call number: LD2668 .T4 1986 W23 / Master of Arts / Communication Studies

Photocopy of typescript. / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries

This research project was aimed at investigation of speech communication issues in industrial noise environments where workers utilize hearing protection devices (HPDs). A controlled empirical study was conducted to determine the effects of several independent variables on speech reception and discrimination including: l). subject's hearing configuration (unoccluded or earplug, earcap, earmuff-occluded), 2). ambient noise intensity level (60, 83 dBA), 3). ambient noise spectral type (low, white approximation, high frequency), 4). speaker's voice level (63 or 65 dBA in 60 dBA noise, 82 or 88 dBA in 83 dBA noise), and 5). subject's hearing level (normal hearing, slight loss, or moderate loss) used as a blocking variable. Isophonemic word discrimination, with male-voiced word lists presented through loudspeakers in an anechoic field, served as the experimental task. Twenty-three males and twenty-two females participated in the experiment and a mixed-factors, partial hierarchical design was used for data collection. Analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls multiple-range tests were applied to the data. All main effects, with the exception of hearing level blocks, were significant, in addition to several interactions. These are discussed in detail and depicted graphically. One fundamental finding was that none of the hearing protection devices degraded speech discrimination (in comparison to an unoccluded condition) in the 83 dBA ambient noise level. In fact, the most protective HPD significantly enhanced speech discrimination in the high noise level. In the low ambient noise level, there was some reduction in discrimination due to the wearing of an HPD, but this effect is not of concern because HPDs are not needed at low ambient levels for protection purposes. From the results, it appears that properly selected HPDs can be expected to at least maintain speech discrimination levels (equivalent to unoccluded levels) in moderately-high intensity industrial noises of varied spectral characteristics. / Master of Science

A study was conducted to determine the dependency of sound attenuation capabilities of earmuffs and earcaps on various application instruction techniques including: (1) no instruction, (2) no instruction with 70 dBA auditory feedback, (3) manufacturers' package instruction, (4) detailed instruction, and (5) modeled instruction. The hearing protection devices (HPDs) studied were: two earcaps (Willson #20 Sound-Ban, Flents #055 Peace & Quiet Headband), and four earmuffs (E-A-R model 1000, Siebe Norton Industrial model 4540, Peltor H6A/v, and Willson 365A Sound Barrier). HPD comfort and wearer preferences were also assessed. Furthermore, typical excessive industrial machinery noises were sampled and analyzed across the 1/3 octave frequencies. Finally, an example is provided as to how these machinery noise spectra can be matched with HPD attenuation spectra to ascertain the protector which would afford optimal protection for a given noise situation. Fifty subjects (twenty-five males and twenty-five females) participated in the experiment. Attenuation characteristics of the HPDs were evaluated utilizing the real-ear attenuation at threshold (REAT) method. A three-way mixed factorial design was used for data collection and analysis of attenuation results. Bipolar scales were used to assess individual HPD comfort, and the HPDs examined were ranked to obtain user preferences. In the analysis of attenuation results, analysis of variance CANOVA) and pairwise comparisons were utilized to detect statistical significance. The comfort scales and ranking scores were evaluated using the Friedman one-way block design. Attenuation results for the earmuffs and earcaps tested showed that they were much less susceptible than earplugs (from a previous study by Epps, 1984) to changes in user insertion/donning instruction technique and also not as dependent on user gender. The main effect of gender was not significant, and in general, any instruction was better than no instruction at all but the effects of those instructions did not differ significantly among each other. As expected, there were main effect differences among the HPDs as to their attenuation capabilities, rated discomfort, and user preference. Because the main objective was on assessing donning instruction effects on HPD attenuation, the comfort/preference assessment was based on only a short (25 minutes) wearing time during the attenuation tests. Therefore, the comfort/preference ratings could likely vary given longer wearing periods and different work environments. All results found are discussed on the basis of the sample data obtained and conclusions drawn from these results should be limited to these experimental conditions and subsequent analyses, as actual attenuation achieved in practice may differ. The example of HPD-machinery noise matching illustrates that the attenuation/spectral matching procedure may indeed be a feasible way of selecting optimal protection for workers. / Master of Science

Thesis. 1978. Ph.D.--Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. / MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND ENGINEERING. / Vita. / Includes bibliographical references. / by Jeffrey C. Alexander. / Ph.D.

The need for hearing protection in industry has evolved from the growing awareness of the detrimental effects of noise on hearing and recent legislation enacted to protect the hearing of noise-exposed employees through the use of hearing conservation programs. In lieu of expensive or impractical engineering and administrative controls, personal hearing protection devices (HPDs) are considered to be the most practical and effective means of protecting employees from the damaging effects of noise in industry today.