Copyright shares a philosophical foundation with traditional property rights and ownership paradigms. Despite the dichotomies between tangible and intangible property, right-holders have gained support for, and control of, overarching monopoly protections using rhetoric based on their co-option of theoretical models. Control has engendered artificial scarcity of cultural products, and the emergence of new content delivery platforms have sustainedly challenged the control model. A global shift towards copyright policy uniformity has resulted in a universally skewed framework that is in need of attention. It is suggested that to achieve optimality within copyright’s parameters, a balancing of all stakeholder interests is crucial. While this view has been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada, persistent challenges to a copyright framework constructed upon balance and inclusivity continue to arise. This includes Parliament’s ongoing struggle to balance the public interest and creators’ rights while aligning Canada’s copyright law with emerging international norms.

Copyright shares a philosophical foundation with traditional property rights and ownership paradigms. Despite the dichotomies between tangible and intangible property, right-holders have gained support for, and control of, overarching monopoly protections using rhetoric based on their co-option of theoretical models. Control has engendered artificial scarcity of cultural products, and the emergence of new content delivery platforms have sustainedly challenged the control model. A global shift towards copyright policy uniformity has resulted in a universally skewed framework that is in need of attention. It is suggested that to achieve optimality within copyright’s parameters, a balancing of all stakeholder interests is crucial. While this view has been recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada, persistent challenges to a copyright framework constructed upon balance and inclusivity continue to arise. This includes Parliament’s ongoing struggle to balance the public interest and creators’ rights while aligning Canada’s copyright law with emerging international norms.

No description available.

Thesis (LL. M.)--University of Toronto, 2005. / Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (M.A.)--University of Wyoming, 2007. / Title from PDF title page (viewed on June 17, 2008). Includes bibliographical references (p. 72-78).

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Potsdam, 2007. / Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (p. 259-275) and index.

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität München.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 1974. / Typescript. Vita. eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Alabama, 1993. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 136-141).

Thèse--Université de Toulouse. / At head of title: Université de Toulouse--Faculté de droit. "Bibliographie": p. [297]-301.