Spelling suggestions: "subject:"corticosteroids receptor""
1 |
Corticosterone up-Regulates Expression and Function of Norepinephrine Transporter in SK-N-BE(2)C CellsSun, Zhongwen, Fan, Yan, Zha, Qinqin, Zhu, Meng Y. 01 April 2010 (has links)
Glucocorticoids affect cellular and molecular events in brains by modulating the expression of many genes during stress. In the present study, we examined the regulatory effect of corticosterone on the expression and function of the norepinephrine transporter (NET) in vitro. The results show that exposure of SK-N-BE(2)C cells to corticosterone for 14 days significantly increased mRNA (up to 43%) and protein (up to 71%) levels of NET in the concentration- dependent manner. Longer exposure (21 days) resulted in greater increases in the levels of mRNAs (up to about 160%) and proteins (up to about 250%) of the NET. The up-regulatory effect of corticosterone on NET expression lasted a persistent period after cessation of exposure. Associated with the corticosterone-induced enhancement in NET expression, there was a parallel increase in the uptake of [3H]norepinephrine by SK-N-BE(2)C cells. Increased NET expression and function were abolished after exposure of cells to corticosterone in combination with mifepristone or spironolactone, two specific antagonists of corticosteroid receptors. This is consistent with the hypothesis that corticosterone-induced NET up-regulation is mediated by corticosteroid receptors. Nevertheless, there was no synergistic effect for a combination of both corticosteroid receptor antagonists. A similar up-regulation of NET protein levels was also observed after exposing PC12 cells to corticosterone. The present findings demonstrate that corticosterone up-regulates the expression and function of NET in vitro, indicating the action of corticosterone on the noradrenergic phenotype may play an important role in the correlation between stress and the development of depression.
|
2 |
AvaliaÃÃo clÃnica da corticoterapia intralesional em lesÃo cen-tral de cÃlulas gigantes dos maxilares : relevÃncia da expressÃo dos receptores de corticÃide e calcitonina, Cox-2, p16 e amplificaÃÃo da ciclina D1 / Clinical Assessment of Intralesional Corticotherapy for Central Giant Cells Lesion Of The Jaws â The Relevance Of Steroid Receptor Expression And Calcitonin, Cox-2, P16 and Amplification of Cyclin D1. Author: Ranato Luiz Maia Nogueira. Leader: Prof. Dr. Ronaldo Albuquerque Ribeiro.Renato Luiz Maia Nogueira 30 July 2010 (has links)
CoordenaÃÃo de AperfeiÃoamento de Pessoal de NÃvel Superior / FundaÃÃo de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Cearà / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento CientÃfico e TecnolÃgico / A LesÃo Central de CÃlulas Gigantes dos maxilares (LCCG) à intra-Ãssea, nÃo tem predileÃÃo por sexo, classifica-se em agressivas e nÃo-agressivas, histologicamente consistem tecido fi-broso e celularizado fusiforme associado a cÃlulas gigantes multinucleadas (CGM), focos de hemorragia e neovascularizaÃÃo, tendo na cirurgia seu habitual tratamento. Novas abordagens terapÃuticas foram propostas, sendo a principal delas o uso de corticÃides intralesionais. Este trabalho analisa retrospectivamente 21 pacientes portadores de LCCG que foram tratados por hexacetonido de triancinolona intralesional, atravÃs do seguinte protocolo: injeÃÃo de hexace-tonido de triancinolona 20mg/ml diluÃdo na soluÃÃo anestÃsica de lidocaÃna 2%/epinefrina 1:200.000 numa proporÃÃo de 1:1; infiltrando 1ml de soluÃÃo para cada 1cm3 de lesÃo, totali-zando 06 aplicaÃÃes em intervalos quinzenais. Estabeleceu-se 04 critÃrios clÃnicos para classi-ficar a resposta ao tratamento: 1- estabilizaÃÃo ou regressÃo clÃnica da lesÃo 2- ausÃncia de sintomas 3- aumento da densidade nos controles radiogrÃficos 4- aumento da resistÃncia a infiltraÃÃo intralesional da droga, bem como, fez-se uma anÃlise imunohistoquÃmica quanto à expressÃo dos Receptores de corticÃides (GCR) e Calcitonina (CTR), Cox-2, proteÃna p16 e amplificaÃÃo gÃnica da Ciclina D1 por CISH, comparando quanto a agressividade e a resposta terapÃutica a corticoterapia intralesional. Dos 21 pacientes incluÃdos neste estudo, 11 eram homens e 10 mulheres, 09 tinham lesÃo em maxila, 12 em mandÃbula. Dez eram lesÃes agres-sivas e 11 nÃo-agressivas, 15 (71,4%) apresentaram uma boa resposta ao tratamento, 04(19%) moderada e 02(9,1%) negativa. Das 11 nÃo agressivas, 10(90,9%) apresentaram boa resposta e 01 (9,1%) resposta moderada, das 10 agressivas 05(50%), 03(30%) e 02(20%) apresentaram boa, moderada e negativa resposta respectivamente, nenhuma apresentou recidiva apÃs o tra-tamento, com preservaÃÃo que variou entre 04 a 08 anos. Os achados histopatolÃgicos mos-traram uma reduÃÃo da densidade e do tamanho das CG, e um estroma fibro-colagenoso das lesÃes. Dentre os marcadores pesquisados, apenas GCR em CG antes do tratamento mostrou significÃncia estatÃstica (p<0,004) com relaÃÃo a uma boa resposta terapÃutica. O CTR ex-pressou-se em cÃlulas gigantes e mononucleares de forma variada. A p16 apresentou-se ex-pressa em 30% da amostra, COX2 nÃo apresentou expressÃo na lesÃo e 33% da amostra apre-sentou amplificaÃÃo gÃnica da ciclina D1. NÃo mostraram significÃncia estatÃstica nem quanto à agressividade, nem quanto resposta ao tratamento, nenhum dos marcadores, exceto o GCR. O estudo mostrou que a corticoterapia intralesional à efetiva e segura para o tratamento das LCCG, com tendÃncia a melhor resposta nas lesÃes nÃo-agressivas do que nas agressivas. Mostrou ainda que a marcaÃÃo para GCR em CG demonstrou ser um parÃmetro confiÃvel para prever a resposta à terapÃutica com a corticoterapia intralesional e que 33% das LCCG tÃm comportamento neoplÃsico pela amplificaÃÃo gÃnica da ciclina D1. / Central Giant Cells Lesion (CGCL) of the jaws is an intra-bone lesion with no predilection for sex and clinically divided into aggressive and non-aggressive subtypes. Histological, it shows as fibrous tissue with fusiform cells, as well as multinucleated giant cells (GC) clusters, he-morrhagic foci and neovascularization. Surgery is the regular treatment option. As new the-rapeutic approaches have been proposed, intralesional glucocorticoid injection is the main option. This paper assesses retrospectively 21 patients presenting CGCL, treated with intrale-sional triamcinolone hexacetonide by using the following protocol: intralesional injection of triamcinolone hexacetonide 20mg/mL, diluted in a solution of lidocain 2% plus epinephrine 1:200000, at a 1:1 proportion; 1mL of this final solution for each 1cm3 of lesion volume was the injected, with a total of 06 injections, one in every 15 days. Four clinical criteria were sta-bilished to evaluate treatment outcome: 1- Clinical regression or stabilization of the lesion; 2- Absence of symptoms; 3- Raising in density on radiographic controls; 4-Increased resistence when injecting the drug intralesionally. It was also performed immunohistochemical assess-ment for glucocorticoid receptor (GCR) expression, calcitonin receptor (CTR) expression, COX-2 expression, p16 expression and Ciclin D1 gene amplification by CISH, making com-parisons related to aggressivity and to therapeutic outcome. Eleven out of 21 patients of this study were women, and 10 were men. Nine of the patients had lesion located in the maxilla, 12 in the mandible. Ten patients showed aggressive lesions and 11 non-aggressive lesions. Fifteen patients showed good treatment outcome, four patients showed moderate outcome, and two patients showed negative answer to the treatment. Among the 11 patients with non-aggressive lesions, ten showed good outcome and the other, moderate outcome. Among the ten aggressive lesions, five patients showed good outcome, three patients showed moderate outcome and the remaining two patients showed negative answer to the treatment. None of them showed reicidive in a four to eight years follow-up period. Morphologic analysis found positive correlation between volume density of GC/mm2 and lesion aggressiveness, as well as significant reduction in number of GC/mm2 after treatment. Among the markers, only GCR in GC showed statistical relevance associated to the treatment. CTR was espresse in GC and in mononuclear cells in a varying way; p16 was expressed in 30% of the sample; COX-2 was not expressed at all in lesion samples and 33% of the sample showed gene amplification in Ciclin D1. None of the markers showed any statistical significant difference related to aggres-siveness nor to treatment outcome, except for GCR. The study showed the feasibility of the adopted treatment, with tendency to better outcomes in non-aggressive lesion, if compared to the aggressive ones. It also showed evidence pointing to GCR expression in GC as a reliable parameter to predict therapeutic responsiveness to glucocorticoids; and it showed that 33% of CGCL have neoplastic behaviour by Ciclin D1 gene amplification.
|
Page generated in 0.1186 seconds