1 |
The age of criminal responsibility, which direction? : a comparative study of the United Kingdom and CanadaLees, Charlotte. January 2000 (has links)
The setting of an 'age of criminal responsibility' by States across the international spectrum is a formal recognition that children do not possess the same mental capacity to comprehend the extent of the criminality of their actions, and their implications, as adults. Any such legal threshold which abruptly deems a child 'criminally responsible' upon the dawning of a birthday is inherently arbitrary, yet a necessary legal fiction. The central conundrum addressed by this discussion is "which direction?"---at what age should policy-makers draw the line. Should legislators be advocating low ages of criminal responsibility, or should they be championing higher ages? An examination of the juvenile justice regimes of the UK and Canada provides an informative backdrop against which to base a sound conclusion: higher ages of criminal responsibility should be adopted in order to counteract and safeguard against the current climate of 'zero tolerance' and retributive 'just deserts' currently motivating youth justice policy.
|
2 |
The age of criminal responsibility, which direction? : a comparative study of the United Kingdom and CanadaLees, Charlotte. January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
3 |
La défense culturelle : un moyen de défense non souhaitable en droit pénal canadienRobert, Marie-Pierre January 2002 (has links)
Mémoire numérisé par la Direction des bibliothèques de l'Université de Montréal.
|
Page generated in 0.1157 seconds