Thesis (M.E.)--University of Canterbury, 2009. / Typescript (photocopy). "January 2009." Includes bibliographical references (p. [77]-89). Also available via the World Wide Web.

Title from title page of PDF (University of Missouri--St. Louis, viewed March 3, 2010). Includes bibliographical references (p. 86-99).

Thesis (M.N.(Clinical))--Victoria University of Wellington, 2009. / Includes bibliographical references.

Introduction: Outcome prediction tools have the potential to provide significant adjunctive information for intensivists. Critically ill obstetric and gynaecology patients constitute a unique subset of the general ICU (intensive care unit) population yet, there exists no outcome prediction model developed specifically for these patients. Objectives: To evaluate the APACHE II score, prospectively develop and validate an outcome prediction model, evaluate organ failure (Organ Failure score and SOFA score) and review the SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome) response in a cohort of critically ill obstetric and gynaecology patients. Design: A prospective study conducted over a 2 year period in the Surgical ICU at King Edward VIII Hospital, Durban. Institutional ethics approval was obtained. Patients were allocated to one of the following categories: Obstetric hypertensive group (Group I), Obstetric non-hypertensive group (Group II) and Gynaecology group (Group III). Group III was further subdivided into a pregnant (Group IIIa) and a non-pregnant group (Group IIIb). Data captured included demographic details, clinical assessment, investigations, treatment, variables required for calculating the APACHE II score, organ failure (OF) assessment, SIRS criteria and patient outcome. The APACHE II system, organ failure assessment and SIRS was evaluated in the entire patient subset. For the purpose of the outcome prediction model, the subset was divided into 2 groups: a development group and a validation group. STATA 7 software was utilised for data analysis. Results: The dataset comprised 260 inpatients. Obstetrics and gynaecology cases represented 18.5 % of the total ICU population (n=1408). The majority of the patients were young (mean age 27 ± 10.5 years). The mean ICU stay was 5.5 ± 7.9 days. The observed mortality for Groups I, II, III, IIIa and IIIb was 23.4%, 43.2%, 42.9%, 33.3% and 55.5% respectively. The mean APACHE II score was significantly higher in nonsurvivors compared to survivors for all patient subgroups (p< 0.0001). However the APACHE II system performed variably in each of the 3 groups. The area under the curve for the ROC curves in each of the 3 main subgroups varied from 0.81 to 0.94 for APACHE II. Groups IIIa and IIIb were too small to permit ROC curve analysis. Age, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, the Glasgow Coma Scale score and pH were identified as significant outcome predictors. Using these parameters an obstetric and gynaecology outcome prediction (OGOP) model was developed for Groups I, II and III. The area under the curve for the ROC curves in each of the subgroups was >0.9 for the OGOP Model. A predictive equation could not be developed for Groups IIIa and IIIb (due to a small number of admissions in these two groups.) Duration and the number of organ failures, correlated with outcome. The duration and number of organ failures associated with mortality differed for each group. Three OF exceeding 72 hours, 3 OF exceeding 48 hours and 3 OF equal to 48 hours were invariably fatal in Groups I, II and III/IIIa/IIIb respectively. SOFA scores were significantly higher in nonsurvivors compared to survivors (p<0.0001). A day one SOFA score equal to 18 (Group I), 15 (Group ll) and 13 (Group III, IIIa, IIIb) was also invariably fatal. A SIRS response was noted in 94.2% of the patient cohort (245/260). The SIRS response varied in the subgroups. Sterile shock and septic shock were associated with a high mortality rate. Groups IIIa and IIIb differed with respect to the mean age, duration of hospital and ICU stay and mortality rate. Although these subsets were numerically restricted (24 and 18 admissions respectively), the results suggest that the two subsets are distinctly different in nature. Comment: The OGOP model is easier to calculate and it is superior to the APACHE II System. It needs to be validated in other local and international units. Organ failure assessment as well as the SIRS response provides useful supplementary outcome information. Although current outcome prediction tools are not designed for individual application, continued research and refinement of the available tools, as well as the exploration of novel methods, may one day result in "near-perfect" prediction estimates and further broaden the scope of their utility. / Thesis (Ph.D)-University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2006.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1992.

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 1992.

Thesis (MNutr (Interdisciplinary Health Sciences. Human Nutrition))--University of Stellenbosch, 2010. / ENGLISH ABSTRACT: Introduction Complications of severe infection or acute trauma include a cascade of immunological dysfunctions known as SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome), that affect response to treatment, prolonging and complicating the course of illness and jeopardizing clinical outcome. Timing and the nature of nutritional support in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting may influence this process. Against this background, and despite some trials demonstrating beneficial clinical outcomes for the use of immune-modulating diets (IMD), the findings of the US summit on immune-enhancing enteral therapy concluded that the currently available enteral immune-enhancing formulas are “first-generation products” which may not be appropriate in patients with SIRS or severe sepsis. This highlights a need for alternative nutritional products that target the specific needs of this patient population. As such, Intestamin® is designed for use in severely stressed patients as an immune-modulating enteral feed supplement which aims to improve maintenance of gut barrier integrity and immune response. Aim The aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effect of Intestamin® administration to critically ill patients, and in particular, to determine if administration would impact on nosocomial infections, ventilation days and the length of stay in the ICU. Methods The study design was an open label, retrospective case control, analytical study, of patients admitted to the ICU in The Bay Hospital, Richards Bay, between January 2002 and November 2003, who received Intestamin®. Patients were selected for the study from post-surgery and post-trauma patients at high risk of sepsis and SIRS, and critically ill patients with manifested SIRS or severe sepsis. Development of respiratory and urinary sepsis was used as surrogate markers for progression to severe sepsis and SIRS. Additionally, duration of ventilation and ICU stay were considered representative of the response to treatment and degree of clinical complications. Results The findings of the study demonstrated a significant difference in the rates of respiratory infection(p=0.05), positive sputum and tracheal aspirate cultures(p=0.03) and urinary catheter tip cultures(p=0.04). with statistically lower rates in the intervention group compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in the rates of urinary tract infection, septicaemia or in combined sepsis rates between the two groups. There were statistically significant higher rates of positive pus cell counts in the sputum(p=0.003) and urine(p=0.01) in the intervention group, compared to the control group. No corresponding reduction in ventilation days or ICU stay was observed. Conclusion In this patient population, early enteral nutrition with specially formulated IMD, (Intestamin®), did result in a significant reduction in respiratory infections, but not in other types of sepsis, ICU or ventilator days in critically ill ICU patients. This positive finding in some, but not all endpoints collected, may reflect confounding factors in the small patient population or the choice of clinical endpoints, rather than a genuine limitation in the benefit. IMD remains a tantalizing and scientifically plausible intervention in this patient population, with larger clinical trials necessary to confirm outcomes. The study supports the safe use of Intestamin by the nasojejenal route in this patient population. / AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING:Inleiding Komplikasies van erge infeksie of akute trauma sluit ‘n kaskade van immunologiese disfunsie in, bekend as SIRS (Sistemiese Inflammatoriese Respons Sindroom), wat die respons op behandeling affekteer, die verloop van siekte verleng en kompliseer asook die kliniese uitkoms beïnvloed. Tydsberekening en die aard van die voedingsondersteuning in die Intensiewe Sorg Eenheid (ISE) mag hierdie proses beinvloed. Teen hierdie agtergrond, en ten spyte van sommige studies wat die voordelige kliniese uitkoms vir die gebruik van immuun-modulerende diete (IMD) toon, het die “US summit” oor immuunverbeterde enterale terapie tot die gevolgtrekking gekom dat die huidige beskikbare enterale immuun-verbeterde formules, “eerste-generasie” produkte is, wat moontlik nie toepaslik is vir pasiente met SIRS of erge sepsis nie. Dit beklemtoon ’n behoefte aan alternatiewe voedingsprodukte wat die spesifieke behoeftes van die genoemde pasient populasie teiken. Intestamin® is ontwerp vir gebruik in erge gestresde pasiente as ‘n immuun-modulerende enterale voedingssupplement doelgerig om spysverteringskanaal integriteit te onderhou en immuniteit te verbeter. Doel Hierdie loodsstudie se doel was om die effek van Intestamin® toediening aan kritiek siek pasiente te ondersoek, spesifiek om vas te stel of die toediening impakteer op nosokomiale infeksies, ventilasie dae en dae in ISE. .Metode Die studie ontwerp was ‘n oop, retrospektiewe, geval kontrole, analitiese studie van pasiente opgeneem in die ISE van The Bay Hospital, Richardsbaai, tussen Januarie 2002 en November 2003, wat Intestamin® ontvang het. Pasiënte is geselekteer vir die studie uit post-chirurgies en post-trauma pasiente wat hoë risiko was vir sepsis en SIRS, en kritiek siek pasiente wat reeds manifisteer het met SIRS of erge sepsis. Ontwikkeling van respiratoriese en urinêre sepsis is gebruik as surrogaat merkers vir die progressie na erge sepsis en SIRS. Addisioneel is duur van ventilasie en ISE verblyf beskou as verteenwoordigend vir die respons op behandeling en die graad van kliniese komplikasies. Resultate Die bevindinge van die studie het betekenisvolle verskille aangedui in die voorkoms van respiratoriese infeksies(p=0.05), positiewe sputum en trachiale aspiraatkulture(p=0.03) en urine kateterpunt-kulture(p=0.04) met statistiese laer voorkoms in die intervensie groep in vergelyking met kontroles. Geen statistiese verskille in die voorkoms van urineweg-infeksies, septisemia of in gekombineerde sepsis voorkoms tussen die twee groepe is gevind nie. Daar was statistiese betekenisvolle hoër voorkoms van etterselle hoeveelhede in die sputum(p=0.030 en uriene(p=0.01) van die intervensie groep in vergelyking met die kontrole groep. Geen ooreenkomstige vermindering in ventilasie dae of ISE verblyf is opgemerk nie. Gevolgtrekking In hierdie pasiënt populasie, het vroeë enterale voeding met spesifieke geformuleerde IMD (Intestamin®), ‘n beduidende vermindering in respiratoriese infeksies getoon, maar nie in ander tipes sepsis, ISE of ventilasie dae by kritiek siek pasiente nie. Hierdie positiewe bevindinge in sommige. maar nie al die versamelde eindpunte nie, reflekteer moontlike bydraende faktore in die klein pasiënt populasie of die keuse van kliniese eindpunte, eerder as a ware beperking in die voordele. IMD bly steeds ‘n uitdagende en wetenskapilik uitsonderlike intervensie in hierdie pasiënt populasie, wat groter kliniese studies benodig om die uitkoms te bevestig. Die studie ondersteun die veilige gebruik van Intestamin® via die nasojejenale roete in kritiek siek pasiënte.

Objective: The survival rates for cardiac arrest patients to hospital discharge are very low. Post-arrest patients have an immune response and usually a period of immunosuppression. When CD3+ T cells activate, they switch from primarily relying on aerobic metabolism to primarily relying on anaerobic metabolism. The goal of this study is to characterize the immune system of post-cardiac arrest patients. The specific objectives are (1) to determine the time period after the occurrence of a cardiac arrest that a patient acquires an infection, (2) to identify the most common types of infections in post-arrest patients, (3) to compare in vitro the cellular oxygen consumption of immune cells post-cardiac arrest with healthy controls, and (4) to compare cell proliferation and ATP production of immune cells post-cardiac arrest with healthy controls. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 170 cardiac arrest patients (Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center) who had return of spontaneous circulation. We measured oxygen consumption rates of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in cardiac arrest patients and healthy controls. We also measured cell proliferation and ATP production of CD3+ T cells in cardiac arrest patients and healthy controls. Results: Of the 170 cardiac arrest patients we reviewed, 42% had at least one incidence of infection. The length of time from cardiac arrest to first positive culture was 4 days, with pneumonia and urinary tract infections the most common diagnoses. The PBMCs of cardiac arrest patients showed a significant decrease in oxygen consumption post arrest compared with healthy controls. When thiamine was added to the PBMC samples of cardiac arrest patients, there was a significant increase in oxygen consumption from baseline. There was no significant difference in cell proliferation or ATP production of CD3+ T cells between the two groups of post-cardiac arrest patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: Many patients suffer from infections post-cardiac arrest, and future research is needed on this subject. Our data support the hypothesis that post-arrest patients have a period of hyperimmune response followed by a period of immunosuppression.

No description available.

M.Cur / According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s(CDC) National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System of 1996, Pseudomonas aeruginosa(P. aeruginosa) can be rated as the number two cause of nosocomial pneumonia(Chen & Rudoy,2006). Nosocomial pneumonia increases hospital cost and morbidity and mortality in patients. Most of the patients in the critical care unit are immune compromised because of underlying illnesses. Antibiotics eliminates the patient’s normal flora which causes opportunity for pathogens to colonise. Indwelling procedures like endotracheal intubation cause a point of entrance for pathogens like P.aeruginosa. The endotracheal tube bypasses the normal physiological processes and inhibits the cough reflex. It is the nurse’s responsibility to remove secretion through endotracheal suctioning. During the past ten years the closed suction method was increasingly implemented to remove secretions because studies showed closed suction caused less infection than open suction. In a spesific critical care unit in a private hospital in Pretoria the nurses are of the opinion that closed suctioning does not effectively remove secretion. Patients are therefore suctioned open which can cause air contamination because the colonised ventilator circuit is opened. The following question can be asked in view of the above arguments and problem statement: Is there a difference in aircontamintion between open and closed suctioning? The aim of the study is to determine whether any difference in air contamination exists between open and closed suctioning in a spesific critical care unit in Pretoria. v A comparitive contextual design with crossover methods was used. Patients are allocated to group 1 or group 2 through random sampling. An air exstractor is used to take airsamples before, during and after suctioning. There was no significant difference in terms of air contamination for open and closed suction. This is probably because of too small a sample. The null hypothesis is accepted and that is there is no significant difference in air contamination between open and closed suction.