The following study looks to examine the effect of an iPad application on the English Language Arts (ELA) skills of listening comprehension for students with significant disabilities. The procedure was evaluated using a multiple probe across participants single case design. Outcomes were measured for improved ELA skills after intervention and were also measured for student engagement. Building upon the research of recent studies that have sought to develop and adapt grade-level literature for students with moderate and severe disabilities, this study seeks to find the effectiveness of an adapted text version of To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee for high school students diagnosed with intellectual disability and/or autism. The implementation of this adapted text included evidenced-based supports such as time delay, the system of least prompts and picture supports taught in conjunction with the use of the iPad application. The need for future research and implications for practice will be discussed.

Doctor of Philosophy / Curriculum and Instruction Programs / Thomas Vontz / Offering a high-quality education to English language learners (ELLs) is a challenge in schools across the United States. Yet, few studies have been conducted to investigate high school English as a second language (ESL) programs. This study provides insights into how a Kansas urban high school ESL program promotes access to the curriculum for ELLs by providing for their social, affective, linguistic, and academic needs. The purpose of this dissertation is to use the premise of educational equity and Catherine Walsh’s (1991) educational needs for ELL school success to explore how structural components of the ESL program in this study promote the access of ELLs to the curriculum. This study offers (1) insights into how urban school districts with high ELL populations might address the issue of access to the curriculum, (2) insights into various perceptions of participant groups—administrators, teachers, and students, and (3) insights into how ESL program components address the educational needs for ELLs to gain access to the curriculum. More specifically, this study emphasizes the following four structural components of the ESL program: (1) student placement, (2) sheltered content courses, (3) teaming, and (4) Spanish for native speakers courses. These structural components are used as a lens to view how social, affective, linguistic, and academic needs of ELLs are addressed. Although the results of this study cannot be generalized to other schools or districts, this study may help other districts, schools, and individual teachers make informed decisions. By demonstrating how four structural ESL program components meet the needs of ELLs in a high school setting, other educators might replicate components on their journey for educational equity within their own venues.

The What Works Clearinghouse guidelines for high-quality professional development were used to develop a Tell, Show, Try, and Apply (TSTA) method of training. This method was used to train teachers to align instruction to grade-level content for students with severe developmental disabilities. A total of 193 teachers of students who participate in alternate assessment based on alternate achievement standards from three states participated in the first 2 days of training. A subset of 37 teachers participated in a 3rd day of training and submitted products from classroom applications. The impact of the TSTA training was evaluated to determine its effect on teachers instructional fidelity across three content areas (e.g., English language arts [ELA], mathematics, science) with their own students. In addition, generalization to new academic content aligned to grade-aligned standards developed by the teachers was taken. Results indicated that the professional development was effective not only in increasing teachers knowledge of alignment but also grade-aligned instruction with generalization across content. Future research questions and practical application also are discussed.

Au Québec, des ressources considérables sont investies pour assurer la réussite scolaire des élèves handicapés et en difficulté, tant au plan des apprentissages, de la socialisation que de la qualification. Pour des raisons évoquées d’équité et d’accès à la formation générale, les politiques éducatives privilégient l’intégration de ces élèves en classe ordinaire (Ministère de l'Éducation, 2008; Ministère de l'Éducation du Québec, 1999, 2004a). Ces politiques appellent de profonds changements dans l’organisation scolaire et conduisent inévitablement les enseignants à adopter des pratiques d’individualisation de leur enseignement. En dépit de l’importance de l’individualisation de l’enseignement pour favoriser la réussite des élèves intégrés, les pratiques pédagogiques mises en œuvre par les enseignants québécois demeurent méconnues. Cette étude vise à obtenir un portrait de ces pratiques. Plus spécifiquement, cette étude vise à obtenir des données sur la fréquence d’utilisation de certaines pratiques, à étudier leur compréhension conceptuelle et appliquée par les enseignants, ainsi qu’à identifier des facteurs personnels et organisationnels pouvant expliquer les différences entre les enseignants. Sur la base de la littérature disponible, une typologie des pratiques d’individualisation a été produite, regroupant quatre pratiques : la différenciation pédagogique, l’enseignement de stratégies, l’accommodation et la modification. Puis, un questionnaire élaboré aux fins de cette étude, permettant d’évaluer empiriquement la prégnance de ces quatre pratiques, a été rempli par 138 enseignants provenant de 35 commissions scolaires du Québec. Parmi ces enseignants, treize ont été sélectionnés et interviewés sur la base des exemples de leurs pratiques mentionnées dans les questions ouvertes du sondage. Fondée sur un devis mixte de type concourant et imbriqué (Creswell, 2003), cette recherche combine une stratégie d’analyse quantitative des données issues du questionnaire à des analyses de contenu des entrevues, de nature qualitative. Les résultats convergent vers trois niveaux de prise en charge de l’hétérogénéité en classe: nuancée, mécanique et réactive. Seuls les enseignants qui ont une prise en charge nuancée démontrent une compréhension et une utilisation des pratiques conformes au cadre conceptuel. Suivant cette hypothèse formulée à partir des données d’entrevue, les résultats d’une ANOVA ont permis de conclure que le tiers des répondants au sondage (n=41) utilisant le plus fréquemment la différenciation pédagogique fait une utilisation significativement peu fréquente de la pratique de la modification. Enfin, des analyses de régression ont révélé que parmi les autres facteurs prédisant l’utilisation des pratiques se trouvent la participation à des activités de formation continue, le niveau d’enseignement, le nombre d’élèves dans le groupe et le nombre d’élèves en difficulté avec des plans d’intervention. Les résultats de cette recherche indiquent un niveau de connaissance inégal des pratiques étudiées chez les enseignants, ainsi qu’une mise en œuvre déficiente des ressources nécessaires à l’intégration scolaire des élèves handicapés ou en difficulté. / Along with the growing number of students with disabilities in regular education classrooms came the need for developing specialized interventions in this setting. Many studies showed that regular education teachers are using only a few individualized adaptations for those children, and that, therefore, many of these students with disabilities don’t have access to curriculum content. This raises the questions of defining appropriate individualized teaching practices, which can be used in regular education class. A review of the literature indicates many individualization options ranging from differentiated instruction to curriculum modification. The aim of the study was to obtain a portrait of use of those practices in the province of Quebec in Canada. The conceptual framework built for this study encompasses four identified individualization options. A web survey along with interviews were conducted to identify individualization practices found in French-language primary schools of Quebec. Carried out using concurrent nested strategy (Creswell, 2003), this mixed method research presents findings regarding frequency and diverse uses of the individualization options by regular teacher. Factors explaining variations were also studied. Study results indicate that the individualization practices most frequently used are those closely resembling regular classroom teaching. Three distinct profiles of teacher response to classroom heterogeneity were identified in the study: nuanced, mechanical and reactive. Only a few teachers among those interviewed had a good conceptual grasp of individualisation practices and were able to use those practices coherently. Results of ANOVA on survey data indicated that teachers who used differentiated instruction frequently—weekly or daily—were significantly less inclined to curriculum and teaching modifications. Regression analysis pointed to in service training as a predictor of frequent use of diffenreciated instruction. Grade level, classroom size and the proportion of students with disabilities were predictors of the use of strategic instruction, accommodation and modification.

No description available.