61 |
Proceedings of the 5th Munich Compliance TalkOrterer, Antonia, Albert, Theresa January 2016 (has links)
The Munich Compliance Talk entitled "Legal Privilege – What is its use actually about?" took place on April 26th, 2016 at the Literaturhaus Munich. At this event, which has been organized together by the Deutschen AnwaltSpiegel – Gruppe and Recommind, compliance professionals, namely lawyers, employees of in-house legal departments, compliance officers and compliance managers have been present. The conference program included impulsive lectures by the experts Dr. Burkhard Schmitt1 (Vice President, Head of EMEIA Compliance at Fujitsu, Munich) and Patrick Späth2, LL.M. (Counsel of WilmerHale in Berlin). Emphasis was – among other things - placed on the legal framework of legal privilege. Moreover the focus was on the company''s point of view, thus the question, how to deal with legal privilege in the company.
|
62 |
Compliance Elliance JournalDeStefano, Michele, Schneider, Hendrik 25 April 2017 (has links)
It gives us great pleasure to introduce you to our fourth edition of the Compliance Elliance Journal (CEJ). We are particularly pleased of a significant innovation, which accompanies our new edition. From now on the CEJ has an Advisory Board, consisting of Derek Six (Compliance Manager at DAW Group, Germany), Marcus Traut (Attorney at and Owner of Anwaltskanzlei Marcus Traut, Germany) and Kenneth Tung (Co-Founder and Chief Strategy Officer at In-Gear Legalytics Limited, China). We are glad that they are willing to support CEJ by their pushing ideas, suggestions and contributions. Thank you for deciding to join CEJ.
|
63 |
Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuer02 October 2020 (has links)
Erste Orientierungshilfe für Bürger zum reformierten Erbschaft- und Schenkungsteuerrecht.
|
64 |
Kinder im Steuerrecht: Kindergeld und weitere steuerliche Möglichkeiten zur Berücksichtigung von Kindern05 October 2020 (has links)
Die 9. Auflage der Broschüre gibt einen Überblick über die wichtigsten Fragen im Zusammenhang mit Kindergeld und weiteren steuerlichen Möglichkeiten zur Berücksichtigung von Kindern.
|
65 |
Compliance Elliance Journal: compliance in digital healthcareDeStefano, Michele, Schneider, Hendrik 26 October 2018 (has links)
The edition features first-rate articles by specialists in the field of healthcare and data security. Apart from that we will face some classical compliance topics and last but not least CEJ Founder Michele DeStefanos new book Legal Upheaval will be introduced and reviewed.
|
66 |
Blockchain in EU e-health - blocked by the barrier of data protection?Gassner, Ulrich M. 26 October 2018 (has links)
Compliance with data protection requirements is always a tricky business and even more
intricate when it comes to cutting-edge technologies such as distributed ledger technology
(DLT), better known as Block Chain Technology (BCT). These difficulties increase even
more when the personal data concerned is accorded a special level of protection, as is the
case with health data. The following article aims to describe and analyze the legal issues
associated with this scenario. The focus here is on the European Union's (EU) General
Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) 1, which took effect on May 25, 2018. Furthermore,
the functionality of BCT and its possible fields of application in healthcare will be outlined.
|
67 |
Data power to the patients! Patient-driven data business, not data-driven patient business: the centrality of the patient in the commerce of digital healthcareHeinemann, Stefan 26 October 2018 (has links)
Data-driven business models make up the medical and healthcare market in large parts, a
trend reinforced by further technological developments and regulation. Care must be taken
to avoid a situation where only a few players benefit. It’s weird the patient has to become a
customer in order to be a human being in the health business: The consistent empowerment
of patients to handle their own data is essential.
|
68 |
Digitization in the health sector in the trade-off between technical and legislative possibilities and legal limits according to German lawKuhn, Anna Kristina, Heinz, Marie-Isabel 26 October 2018 (has links)
In May 2018, the 121st German Medical Association in Erfurt decided to relax the prohibition
of exclusive remote treatment which had previously been standardized in the Model
Professional Code of Conduct for physicians working in Germany (MBO-Ä). With this,
the German Medical Association has responded to the continuing call for progress and
further development in terms of digitization. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered,
such as the implementation and interpretation of the provisions of § 7 para. 4
MBO-Ä in its new wording and their embedding in existing regulations. Data protection,
which defines the legal limits of remote treatment, also plays an important role here.
|
69 |
Digital health regulatory gaps in the United StatesNahra, Kirk J., Corbin, Bethany A. 26 October 2018 (has links)
Digital health in the United States is rapidly and continuously evolving to enhance patient
care and revolutionize health care delivery. This technology offers substantial promise to
both patients and providers, but lacks a comprehensive regulatory structure to ensure adequate
safety and privacy. While the Department of Health and Human Services, the Food
and Drug Administration, and the Federal Trade Commission regulate portions of the
digital health industry, their oversight is incomplete, with numerous digital health companies
falling between the cracks and assuming an unregulated status. This article analyzes
the state of digital health legal and regulatory oversight in the United States, discusses how
state legislatures and industry organizations have worked to fill existing legal gaps, and
presents strategies for encouraging compliance for unregulated entities.
|
70 |
Eliminating bribery - an incentive-based approachTeichmann, Fabian M. 26 October 2018 (has links)
This article discusses the potential role of incentive systems in combating bribery. In particular,
it uses an agency theory approach to show how a combination of bonus and malus
payments could help to eliminate bribery in multinational corporations. Expert interviews
with 35 anti-bribery specialists from Austria, Germany, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland
were conducted and analyzed through qualitative content analysis. It was found that employees
should be rewarded for both productivity and compliance. In addition, performance
should be measured in a matrix and whistleblowers should receive a bonus for reporting
undesired behavior. Conversely, significant risks associated with incentives for whistleblowing
were also identified. Whilst the empirical findings focus on Europe, their implications
could be applied globally.
|
Page generated in 0.0233 seconds