Spelling suggestions: "subject:"ethylhexyl phthalate"" "subject:"ethylhexyloxy phthalate""
1 |
Treatment of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate by integrating adsorption by chitinous materials and photocatalytic oxidation.January 2006 (has links)
by Chan Chui Man. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-94). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Acknowledgements --- p.i / Abstract --- p.ii / 摘要 --- p.iii / Contents --- p.iv / List of Figures --- p.ix / List of Plates --- p.xi / List of Tables --- p.xii / List of Abbreviations --- p.xiv / Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1.1 --- The chemical class of DEHP: Phthalate ester --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1.2 --- Characteristics of DEHP --- p.3 / Chapter 1.1.3 --- Sources of releases and environmental concentration --- p.4 / Chapter 1.1.4 --- Persistence of DEHP --- p.5 / Chapter 1.1.5 --- Routes of exposure --- p.6 / Chapter 1.1.6 --- Toxicity of DEHP --- p.7 / Chapter 1.1.6.1 --- Acute toxicity --- p.7 / Chapter 1.1.6.2 --- Chronic toxicity --- p.8 / Chapter 1.1.6.2.1 --- Adverse effects on reproduction system --- p.8 / Chapter 1.1.6.2.2 --- Carcinogenicity --- p.9 / Chapter 1.1.6.2.3 --- Developmental toxicity --- p.9 / Chapter 1.1.6.2.4 --- Endocrine disruption --- p.10 / Chapter 1.1.6.2.5 --- Hepatotoxicity --- p.10 / Chapter 1.1.7 --- Regulations --- p.10 / Chapter 1.2 --- Treatment of DEHP --- p.11 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- Conventional treatment technologies --- p.11 / Chapter 1.2.1.1 --- Physical method --- p.11 / Chapter 1.2.1.1.1 --- Adsorption --- p.11 / Chapter 1.2.1.1.2 --- Sonolysis --- p.12 / Chapter 1.2.1.2 --- Photochemical method --- p.13 / Chapter 1.2.1.2.1 --- Photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) --- p.13 / Chapter 1.2.1.3 --- Biological method --- p.13 / Chapter 1.2.1.3.1 --- Biodegradation --- p.13 / Chapter 1.2.1.3.2 --- Sewage treatment process --- p.14 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- Integrated treatment method in the present study --- p.15 / Chapter 1.2.2.1 --- Biosorption --- p.15 / Chapter 1.2.2.1.1 --- Definition of biosorption --- p.15 / Chapter 1.2.2.1.2 --- Advantages of biosorption --- p.16 / Chapter 1.2.2.1.3 --- Chitinous materials as biosorbents --- p.16 / Chapter 1.2.2.1.4 --- Advantages of using chitinous materials as biosorbents --- p.17 / Chapter 1.2.2.1.5 --- Modeling of biosorption --- p.19 / Chapter 1.2.2.2 --- PCO --- p.21 / Chapter 1.2.2.2.1 --- Definition of PCO --- p.21 / Chapter 1.2.2.2.2 --- Mechanism of PCO --- p.23 / Chapter 1.2.2.2.3 --- Advantages of PCO --- p.25 / Chapter 2 --- Objectives --- p.27 / Chapter 3 --- Materials and methods --- p.28 / Chapter 3.1 --- Materials --- p.28 / Chapter 3.1.1 --- Adsorbate --- p.28 / Chapter 3.1.2 --- Biosorbents --- p.28 / Chapter 3.1.2.1 --- Pretreatment of biosorbents --- p.29 / Chapter 3.1.3 --- Photocatalytic reactor --- p.29 / Chapter 3.1.4 --- Photocatalyst --- p.30 / Chapter 3.1.5 --- Electron scavenger --- p.31 / Chapter 3.2 --- Methods --- p.31 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Determination of DEHP concentration --- p.31 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Batch biosorption experiment --- p.32 / Chapter 3.2.2.1 --- Screening of biosorbents --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.2.2 --- Optimization of biosorption conditions --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.1 --- Effect of biosorbent concentration --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.2 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.33 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.3 --- Effect of biosorption time --- p.34 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.4 --- Effect of temperature --- p.34 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.5 --- Effect of agitation rate --- p.34 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.6 --- Effect of initial DEHP concentration --- p.34 / Chapter 3.2.2.2.7 --- "Combinational effect of initial pH, chitin A concentration and initial DEHP concentration" --- p.35 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- Extraction of adsorbed DEHP from chitin A --- p.35 / Chapter 3.2.3.1 --- Screening of extraction agents --- p.36 / Chapter 3.2.3.2 --- Determination of extraction time --- p.36 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- Batch PCO experiment --- p.36 / Chapter 3.2.4.1 --- Optimization of PCO conditions --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.1 --- Effect of reaction time --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.2 --- Effect of UV-A intensity --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.3 --- Effect of TiO2 concentration --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.4 --- Effect of H2O2 concentration --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.5 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.6 --- Combinational effect of H2O2 concentration and initial pH --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.4.1.7 --- Effect of concentration factor --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.4.2 --- Identification of intermediates/products of DEHP --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.4.3 --- Evaluation for the toxicity of DEHP and the intermediates/products by the Microtox® test --- p.40 / Chapter 4 --- Results --- p.42 / Chapter 4.1 --- Batch biosorption experiment --- p.42 / Chapter 4.1.1 --- Screening of biosorbents --- p.42 / Chapter 4.1.2 --- Optimization of biosorption conditions --- p.42 / Chapter 4.1.2.1 --- Effect of biosorbent concentration --- p.42 / Chapter 4.1.2.2 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.42 / Chapter 4.1.2.3 --- Effect of biosorption time --- p.46 / Chapter 4.1.2.4 --- Effect of temperature --- p.46 / Chapter 4.1.2.5 --- Effect of agitation rate --- p.46 / Chapter 4.1.2.6 --- Effect of initial DEHP concentration --- p.46 / Chapter 4.1.2.7 --- "Combinational effect of initial pH, chitin A concentration and initial DEHP concentration" --- p.51 / Chapter 4.1.2.8 --- Summary of biosorption conditions before and after optimization --- p.54 / Chapter 4.2 --- Extraction of adsorbed DEHP from chitin A --- p.54 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Screening of extraction agents --- p.54 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- Determination of extraction time --- p.55 / Chapter 4.3 --- Batch PCO experiment --- p.56 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Optimization of PCO conditions --- p.56 / Chapter 4.3.1.1 --- Effect of reaction time --- p.56 / Chapter 4.3.1.2 --- Effect of UV-A intensity --- p.57 / Chapter 4.3.1.3 --- Effect of TiO2 concentration --- p.59 / Chapter 4.3.1.4 --- Effect of H2O2 concentration --- p.60 / Chapter 4.3.1.5 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.61 / Chapter 4.3.1.6 --- Combinational effect of H2O2 concentration and initial pH --- p.62 / Chapter 4.3.1.7 --- Effect of CF --- p.63 / Chapter 4.3.1.8 --- Summary of PCO conditions before and after optimization --- p.63 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Identification of intermediates/products of DEHP --- p.64 / Chapter 4.3.3 --- Evaluation for the toxicity of DEHP and the intermediates/products by the Microtox® test --- p.66 / Chapter 5 --- Discussion --- p.68 / Chapter 5.1 --- Batch biosorption experiment --- p.68 / Chapter 5.1.1 --- Screening of biosorbents --- p.68 / Chapter 5.1.2 --- Optimization of biosorption conditions --- p.69 / Chapter 5.1.2.1 --- Effect of biosorbent concentration --- p.69 / Chapter 5.1.2.2 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.69 / Chapter 5.1.2.3 --- Effect of biosorption time --- p.70 / Chapter 5.1.2.4 --- Effect of temperature --- p.71 / Chapter 5.1.2.5 --- Effect of agitation rate --- p.71 / Chapter 5.1.2.6 --- Effect of initial DEHP concentration --- p.71 / Chapter 5.1.2.7 --- "Combinational effect of initial pH, chitin A concentration and initial DEHP concentration" --- p.73 / Chapter 5.2 --- Extraction of adsorbed DEHP from chitin A --- p.74 / Chapter 5.2.1 --- Screening of extraction agents --- p.74 / Chapter 5.2.2. --- Determination of extraction time --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3 --- Batch PCO experiment --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3.1 --- Optimization of PCO conditions --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3.1.1 --- Effect of reaction time --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3.1.2 --- Effect of UV-A intensity --- p.74 / Chapter 5.3.1.3 --- Effect of TiO2 concentration --- p.75 / Chapter 5.3.1.4 --- Effect of H2O2 concentration --- p.75 / Chapter 5.3.1.5 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.76 / Chapter 5.3.1.6 --- Combinational effect of H2O2 concentration and initial pH --- p.77 / Chapter 5.3.1.7 --- Effect of CF --- p.77 / Chapter 5.3.2 --- Identification of intermediates/products of DEHP --- p.78 / Chapter 5.3.3 --- Evaluation for the toxicity of DEHP and the intermediates/products by the Microtox test --- p.79 / Chapter 6 --- Conclusions --- p.80 / Chapter 7 --- References --- p.83
|
2 |
Permeability analysis for thermal binder removal from green ceramic bodiesYun, Jeong Woo, January 2007 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 2007. / The entire dissertation/thesis text is included in the research.pdf file; the official abstract appears in the short.pdf file (which also appears in the research.pdf); a non-technical general description, or public abstract, appears in the public.pdf file. Title from title screen of research.pdf file (viewed on October 16, 2007) Vita. Includes bibliographical references.
|
3 |
Integrated treatment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate by biosorption and photocatalytic oxidation =: 以生物吸附作用及光催化降解作為鄰苯二甲酸二(2-乙基巳基)酯的綜合處理法. / 以生物吸附作用及光催化降解作為鄰苯二甲酸二(2-乙基巳基)酯的綜合處理法 / Integrated treatment of di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate by biosorption and photocatalytic oxidation =: Yi sheng wu xi fu zuo yong ji guang cui hua xiang jie zuo wei lin ben er jia suan er(2--yi ji yi ji)zhi de zong he chu li fa. / Yi sheng wu xi fu zuo yong ji guang cui hua xiang jie zuo wei lin ben er jia suan er(2--yi ji yi ji)zhi de zong he chu li faJanuary 2002 (has links)
by Chan Hiu-wai. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 123-133). / Text in English; abstracts in English and Chinese. / by Chan Hiu-wai. / Acknowledgements --- p.i / Abstract --- p.ii / List of Figures --- p.x / List of Tables --- p.xiii / List of Abbreviations --- p.xv / Page / Chapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- The chemical class: Phthalate esters --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate --- p.2 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- Characteristics of DEHP --- p.5 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- Production and applications --- p.5 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- Environmental releases and environmental fate --- p.8 / Chapter 1.2.4 --- Toxicity of DEHP --- p.8 / Chapter 1.2.4.1 --- Mammalian toxicity --- p.9 / Chapter 1.2.4.2 --- Toxicity to aquatic organisms --- p.10 / Chapter 1.2.5 --- Regulations --- p.10 / Chapter 1.3 --- Conventional technologies for DEHP removal --- p.11 / Chapter 1.3.1 --- Biodegradation --- p.11 / Chapter 1.3.2 --- Coagulation --- p.11 / Chapter 1.3.3 --- Adsorption --- p.11 / Chapter 1.4 --- Innovative technologies for DEHP removal --- p.12 / Chapter 1.4.1 --- Biosorption --- p.13 / Chapter 1.4.1.1 --- Definition of biosorption --- p.13 / Chapter 1.4.1.2 --- Mechanisms --- p.13 / Chapter 1.4.1.3 --- Selection of biosorbents --- p.17 / Chapter 1.4.1.4 --- Assessment of biosorption performance --- p.21 / Chapter a. --- Batch adsorption experiments --- p.21 / Chapter b. --- Modeling of biosorption --- p.21 / Chapter 1.4.1.5 --- Recovery of biosorbents --- p.23 / Chapter 1.4.1.6 --- Development of biosorption process --- p.23 / Chapter 1.4.1.7 --- Seaweeds as biosorbents --- p.24 / Chapter 1.4.2 --- Advanced oxidation processes --- p.27 / Chapter 1.4.3 --- Heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation --- p.30 / Chapter 1.4.3.1 --- Photocatalyst --- p.30 / Chapter 1.4.3.2 --- General mechanisms --- p.31 / Chapter 1.4.3.3 --- Influencing parameters in PCO --- p.33 / Chapter 1.4.3.4 --- Enhanced performance by addition of hydrogen peroxide --- p.33 / Chapter 2 --- Objectives --- p.36 / Chapter 3 --- Materials and Methods --- p.38 / Chapter 3.1 --- Chemical reagents --- p.38 / Chapter 3.2 --- Biosorption of DEHP by seaweed biomass --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.1 --- Biosorbents --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.2 --- Determination method of DEHP --- p.39 / Chapter 3.2.3 --- Batch adsorption experiments --- p.44 / Chapter 3.2.3.1 --- Screening of potential biomass --- p.44 / Chapter 3.2.3.2 --- Characterization of beached seaweed and S. siliquastrum --- p.44 / Chapter a. --- Total organic carbon (TOC) content --- p.44 / Chapter b. --- Leaching of biomass components --- p.45 / Chapter 3.2.3.3 --- Combined effect of pH and biomass concentration --- p.45 / Chapter 3.2.3.4 --- Effect of retention time --- p.45 / Chapter 3.2.3.5 --- Effect of agitation rate --- p.45 / Chapter 3.2.3.6 --- Effect of temperature --- p.46 / Chapter 3.2.3.7 --- Effect of particle size --- p.46 / Chapter 3.2.3.8 --- Effect of DEHP concentration --- p.46 / Chapter 3.2.4 --- Recovery of adsorbed DEHP from seaweed biomass --- p.47 / Chapter 3.2.4.1 --- Screening for suitable desorbing agents --- p.47 / Chapter 3.2.4.2 --- Multiple adsorption-desorption cycles --- p.47 / Chapter 3.2.5 --- Statistical analysis --- p.43 / Chapter 3.3 --- Photocatalytic oxidation --- p.48 / Chapter 3.3.1 --- Photocatalytic reactor --- p.48 / Chapter 3.3.2 --- Optimization of reaction conditions --- p.48 / Chapter 3.3.2.1 --- Effect of reaction time --- p.48 / Chapter 3.3.2.2 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.51 / Chapter 3.3.2.3 --- Effect of Ti02 concentration --- p.51 / Chapter 3.3.2.4 --- Effect of UV intensity --- p.52 / Chapter 3.3.2.5 --- Effect of H202 concentration --- p.52 / Chapter 3.3.2.6 --- Effect of initial DEHP concentration and irradiation time --- p.52 / Chapter 3.3.2.7 --- Statistical analysis --- p.52 / Chapter 3.3.4 --- Determination of mineralization of DEHP by analyzing total Organic carbon (TOC) content --- p.53 / Chapter 3.3.5 --- Identification of intermediate products of DEHP --- p.53 / Chapter 3.3.6 --- Evaluation for the toxicity of DEHP and intermediate products --- p.53 / Chapter 3.3.6.1 --- Microtox® test --- p.53 / Chapter 3.3.6.2 --- Amphipod survival test --- p.55 / Chapter 3.4 --- Feasibility of combining biosorption and photocatalyic oxidation as an Integrated treatment for DEHP --- p.57 / Chapter 3.4.1 --- Effect of algal extract on photocatalytic oxidation of DEHP --- p.57 / Chapter 3.4.2 --- Determination of mineralization of algal extract by analyzing total organic carbon (TOC) --- p.57 / Chapter 4 --- Results --- p.58 / Chapter 4.1 --- Determination method of DEHP --- p.58 / Chapter 4.2 --- Biosorption --- p.58 / Chapter 4.2.1 --- Batch adsorption experiments --- p.58 / Chapter 4.2.1.1 --- Screening of potential biomass --- p.58 / Chapter 4.2.1.2 --- Characterization of beached seaweed and S. siliquastrum --- p.61 / Chapter a. --- Total organic carbon (TOC) content --- p.61 / Chapter b. --- Leaching properties --- p.61 / Chapter 4.2.1.3 --- Combined effect of pH and biomass concentration --- p.61 / Chapter 4.2.1.4 --- Effect of retention time --- p.74 / Chapter 4.2.1.5 --- Effect of agitation rate --- p.74 / Chapter 4.2.1.6 --- Effect of temperature --- p.74 / Chapter 4.2.1.7 --- Effect of particle size --- p.74 / Chapter 4.2.1.8 --- Effect of initial DEHP concentration: Modeling by Langmuir and Freundlich adsorptin isotherm --- p.79 / Chapter 4.2.2 --- Recovery of adsorbed DEHP by seaweed biomass --- p.84 / Chapter 4.2.2.1 --- Screening for suitable desorbing agents --- p.84 / Chapter 4.2.2.2 --- Multiple adsorption-desorption cycles --- p.84 / Chapter 4.3 --- Photocatalytic oxidation --- p.90 / Chapter 4.3.1 --- Optimization of reaction conditions --- p.90 / Chapter 4.3.1.1 --- Effect of reaction time --- p.90 / Chapter 4.3.1.2 --- Effect of initial pH --- p.90 / Chapter 4.3.1.3 --- Effect of TiO2 concentration --- p.90 / Chapter 4.3.1.4 --- Effect of UV intensity --- p.90 / Chapter 4.3.1.5 --- Effect of H2O2 concentration --- p.95 / Chapter 4.3.1.6 --- Effect of initial DEHP and irradiation time --- p.95 / Chapter 4.3.2 --- Determination of mineralization of DEHP by analyzing total organic carbon (TOC) --- p.95 / Chapter 4.3.3 --- Identification of intermediate products of DEHP --- p.95 / Chapter 4.3.4 --- Evaluation for the toxicity of DEHP and the intermediate products --- p.102 / Chapter 4.3.4.1 --- Microtox® test --- p.102 / Chapter 4.3.4.2 --- Amphipod survival test --- p.102 / Chapter 4.4 --- Feasibility of combining biosorption and photocatalytic oxidation as an integrated treatment for DEHP --- p.102 / Chapter 4.4.1 --- Effect of algal extract on photocatalytic oxidation of DEHP --- p.102 / Chapter 4.4.2 --- Determination of mineralization of algal extract by analyzing total organic carbon (TOC) --- p.103 / Chapter 5 --- Discussion --- p.108 / Chapter 5.1 --- Determination method of DEHP --- p.108 / Chapter 5.2 --- Biosorption --- p.108 / Chapter 5.2.1 --- Batch adsorption experiments --- p.108 / Chapter 5.2.1.1 --- Screening of potential biomass --- p.108 / Chapter 5.2.1.2 --- Characteristic of S. siliquastrum and beached seaweed --- p.109 / Chapter 5.2.1.3 --- Combined effect of pH and biomass concentration --- p.109 / Chapter 5.2.1.4 --- Effect of retention time --- p.111 / Chapter 5.2.1.5 --- Effect of agitation rate --- p.111 / Chapter 5.2.1.6 --- Effect of temperature --- p.111 / Chapter 5.2.1.7 --- Effect of particle size --- p.112 / Chapter 5.2.1.8 --- Effect of initial DEHP concentration: Modeling of Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms --- p.112 / Chapter 5.2.2 --- Recovery of adsorbed DEHP by seaweed biomass --- p.114 / Chapter 5.2.2.1 --- Screening for suitable desorbing agents --- p.114 / Chapter 5.2.2.2 --- Multiple adsorption-desorption cycles --- p.115 / Chapter 5.3 --- Photocatalytic oxidation --- p.115 / Chapter 5.3.1 --- Optimization of reaction conditions --- p.115 / Chapter 5.3.1.1 --- Effect of reaction time --- p.115 / Chapter 5.3.1.2 --- Effect of pH --- p.116 / Chapter 5.3.1.3 --- Effect of TiO2 concentration --- p.116 / Chapter 5.3.1.4 --- Effect of UV intensity --- p.116 / Chapter 5.3.1.5 --- Effect of H2O2 concentration --- p.117 / Chapter 5.3.1.6 --- Effect of DEHP concentration and irradiation time --- p.117 / Chapter 5.3.2 --- Determination of mineralization of DEHP by analyzing total organic carbon (TOC) --- p.117 / Chapter 5.3.3 --- Identification of intermediate products of DEHP --- p.118 / Chapter 5.3.4 --- Evaluation for the toxicity of DEHP and the intermediate products --- p.119 / Chapter 5.4 --- Feasibility of combining biosorption and photocatalytic oxidation as an integrated treatment for DEHP --- p.119 / Chapter 6 --- Conclusions --- p.121 / Chapter 7 --- References --- p.123
|
4 |
Contamination of Firefighter Personal Protective GearAlexander, Barbara M. 17 September 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
5 |
Uticaj ftalata iz spoljašnje sredine na neke metaboličke poremećaje / The influence of phthalates at environmental levels on certain metabolic disordersBosić-Živanović Dragana 30 September 2015 (has links)
<p>Uvod. Ftalati su endokrini disruptori, široko se koriste kao plastifikatori, rastvarači i aditivi u mnogim potrošačkim proizvodima. Eksperimentalni podaci i humane studije sugerišu na povezanost ftalata sa gojaznošću i dijabetesom. Cilj. Utvrditi da li su i koji urinami metaboliti ftalata prisutni i da li postoje razlike u njihovim nivoima između bolesnika s tipom 2 šećeme bolesti, gojaznih i kontrolne grupe zdravih osoba; da li postoji povezanost između metabolita ftalata i gojaznosti, lipida i lipoproteina seruma, glikemije, insulinemije i insulinske rezistencije.<br />Metode. Istraživanje je obuhvatilo 305 ispitanika, podeljenih u 3 grupe: gojazni (n=104), dijabetesni bolesnici tip 2 (n=101) i zdrave osobe (n=100), oba pola. U svih ispitanika su izvršena antropometrijska merenja (BMI i obim struka), određivanje serumskih lipida (ukupni holesterol, trigliceidi, HDL i LDL holesterol), te glikemija, insulinemija i izračunat indeks insulinske rezistencije (HOMA IRI). U jutarnjem uzorku urina meren je nivo 10 ftalatnih metabolita: mono-metil ftalat (MMP), mono-etil ftalat (MEP), mono-n-butil ftalat (MnBP), mono- benzil ftalat (MBzP), mono-cikloheksil ftalat (MCHP), mono-n-propil ftalat (MPP), mono-n-amil ftalat (MnAP), mono-izo-amil ftalat (MiAP), mono- n-oktil ftalat (MOP), mono-2-etilheksil ftalat (MEHP). U odnosu na prisustvo ftalata u urinu svaka grupa je podeljena u podgrupe na one sa prisutnim ftalatima i one bez ftalata u urinu, odnosno na podgrupe MEP pozitivne, MEP negativne, MEHP pozitivne i MEHP negativne. Rezultati. Kod polovine ispitanika registrovali smo prisustvo u urinu pojedinih metabolita ftalata. Najčešći su bili MEHP i MEP. Najveća sličnost u nivou MEP-a i MEHP-a je bila između gojaznih i dijabetesnih ispitanika. U odnosu na antropometrij ske parametre uočena je pozitivna korelacija MEP-a sa BMI i obimom struka, a negativna korelacija MEHP-a sa BMI i obimom struka, ali su bile nesignifikantne. Samo kod MEHP pozitivnih kontrolne grupe uočena je statistički značajna pozitivna korelacija MEHP-a i obima struka. Utvrđena je statistički značajna negativna korelaciju MEP-a i HDL holesterola, a pozitivna korelacija MEP-a i triglicerida samo kod gojaznih. Samo u kontrolnoj grupi MEHP pozitivnih postojala je statistički značajna negativna korelacija sa HDL holesterolom. Postojala je pozitivna korelacija MEP-a i HOMA-IRI, a pozitivna korelacija MEHP-a sa glikemijom samo kod MEHP pozitivnih DM tip 2. Zaključak. Potvrđeno je da je kontaminacija ftalatima prisutna u našoj populaciji, a najčešće su prisutni MEHP i MEP, ukazujući na ekspoziciju DEHP i DEP. Indirektno smo stekli uvid da povećana izloženost DEP i DEHP može doprineti nastanku izvesnih poremećaja lipida i lipoproteina, insulinskoj rezistenciji kao i razvoju gojaznosti.</p> / <p>Introduction. Phthalates are endocrine disruptors, widely used as plasticizers, solvents and additives in a wide range of consumer products. Experimental data and human studies suggest that phthalate exposure is linked with obesity and diabetes. Aim. To determine whether urinary phthalate metabolites are present, which ones are present, whether there are differences between their levels among the patients with type 2 diabetes, obesity patients and a control group of healthy individuals; whether there is a link between phthalate metabolites and obesity, lipids, serum lipoproteins, glycemia, insulinemia and insulin resistance. Methods. The research included 305 participants divided into three groups: obesity patients (n=104), type 2 diabetes patients (n=101) and healthy individuals (n=100) in both sexes. Anthropometric measurements were taken from all participants (BMI and waist circumference), as well as measurement of serum lipids (total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL and LDL cholesterol), glycemia, insulinemia and a calculation of insulin resistance index (HOMA IRI). The levels of ten phthalate metabolites were<br />measured in a morning sample of urine: Mono-methyl phthalate (MMP), Mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), Mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP), Mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), Mono- cyclohexyl phthalate (MCHP), Mono-n-propyl phthalate (MPP), Mono-n-amyl phthalate (MnAP), Mono-iso-amyl phthalate (MiAP), Mono-n-octyl phthalate (MOP), Mono-2- ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP). Regarding the presence of phthalates in urine, each group was divided into subgroups, containing phthalates and or not containing phthalates, i.e. subgroups MEP positive and MEP negative, MEHP positive and MEHP negative. Results. In a half of participants, we have registered the presence of certain phthalate metabolites in urine, most often MEHP and MEP. The highest similarity in the levels of MEHP and MEP was between obesity and diabetes participants. Regarding anthropometric measurements, positive correlation has been registered between MEP and BMI and waist circumference, while negative correlation has been registered between MEHP and BMI and waist circumference, but it was insignificant. Only in MEHP positive control group, statistically significant positive correlation between MEHP and waist circumference has been registered. Statistically significant negative correlation between MEP and HDL cholesterol has been registered, while positive correlation between MEP and triglycerides has been registered only in obesity patients group. Only in MEHP positive control group statistically significant negative correlation with HDL cholesterol has been registered. There has been a positive correlation between MEP and HOMA-IRI, while positive correlation between MEHP and glycemia has been registered only in MEHP positive DM type 2. Conclusion. It has been confirmed that our population is contaminated with phthalates, most commonly MEHP and MEP, indicating exposure to DEHP and DEP. Indirectly, we have realized that an increased exposure to DEHP and DEP can contribute to the development of certain lipid and lipoprotein disorders, insulin resistance, as well as the development of obesity.</p>
|
6 |
Uticaj estara ftalne kiseline na tiroidnu funkciju / The influence of phthalic acid esters on thyroid functionBajkin Ivana 20 May 2016 (has links)
<p>Uvod: Poslednjih godina u fokusu istraživača je efekat sintetskih jednjenja na endokrini sistem. Estri ftalne kiseline se koriste u procesu plastifikacije, kao industrijski rastvarači, lubrikanti, aditivi u tekstilnoj industriji, u pesticidima, kozmetičkim proizvodima. Raste broj dokaza da je tiroidna žlezda podložna dejstvu endokrinih disruptora. Tiroidni hormoni imaju važnu ulogu u regulaciji rasta, tkivne diferencijacije, energetskog metabolizma, reprodukcije i formiranja centralnog nervnog sistema. Brojna istraživanja ukazala su da ftalati deluju kao EDs. Ciljevi istraživanja: 1. Procena izloženosti populacije mono-etilheksil-ftalatu (MEHP) i mono-etil-ftalatu (MEP). 2. Evaluacija razlika u nivou pokazatelja tirodine funkcije između ftalat pozitivnih i ftalat negativnih ispitanika i između gojaznih i normalno uhranjenih ftalat pozitivnih ispitanika. 3.Utvrđivanje razlika u serumskom nivou leptina gojaznih ispitanika sa i bez pozitivnih ftalatnih metabolita i procena povezanosti leptina sa MEP i MEHP i pokazateljima tiroidne funkcije. Izbor ispitanika i metod rada: Istraživanje je sprovedeno kao studija preseka, obuhvatilo je 201 ispitanika. Ispitanici su podeljeni u grupu MEP/MEHP pozitivnih i negativnih i na podgupe normalno uhranjenih i gojaznih. Od antropometrijskih mera određena je telesna visina, telesna masa, obim struka i indeks telesne mase. Laboratorijske analize: jutarnji uzorak urina za određivanje MEP i MEHP; našte uzet uzorka venske krvi za FT4, FT3, TSH i leptin. Statististička analiza sprovedena je na softverskom paketu SPSS. Rezultati: Polovina stanovništva je izložena ftalatima. MEP dovodi do povišenja FT4 samo u subpopulaciji gojaznih. Nije utvrđen statistički značajan uticaj MEP na FT3. Kod gojaznih MEP pozitivnih osoba ženskog pola povišen je TSH. MEHP uzrokuje sniženje FT4 kod normalno uhranjenih ispitanika, a kod normalno uhranjenih muškaraca snižava FT3. Nije utvrđen uticaj MEHP na tirotropin. U gojaznih nije ustanovljen uticaj DEHP i DEP na leptinsku sekreciju.Uočena je tendencija negativne korelacije leptina i FT4 kod gojaznih, dok uticaja na FT3 i TSH nema. Zaključak: Naša populacija je u velikoj meri izložena ftalatima. Potvrđeno je da MEP i MEHP imaju uticaj na pojedine indikatore tiroidne funkcije. Ftalati u našem istraživanju ne uzrokuju poremećaj leptinske skrecije, a leptin ima blag uticaj jedino na FT4.</p> / <p>Introduction: Effects of synthesized chemicals on endocrine system has been in the focus in the last years. Phthalates are used in plasticization, as industrial solvents, lubricants, textile industry additives, in pesticides and cosmetic products. Evidence for thyroid disruption is growing. Thyroid hormones (TH) have an important role in regulation of growth, tissue differentiation, energy metabolism, reproduction and central nervous system formation. Studies show phthalates can cause endocrine disruption. Aims: 1. Estimation of burden of mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP) and di-2-ethylheksyl phthalate(MEHP) in the population. 2. Evaluation of differences in TH and TSH in MEP/MEHP positive and negative participants, as in obese and lean MEP/MEHP positive participants. 3. Evaluation of differences in leptin in obese MEP/MEHP positive and negative subjects and evaluation of the connection between leptin, MEP, MEHP and thyroid indicators. Patients and methods: This was a cross-sectional study that comprised 201 subjects divided into MEP/MEHP positive and negative group, further subdivided in obese and lean. Anthropometric parameters done: body height, body weight, waist and body mass index. Laboratory tests done: morning urine sample analysis for MEP/MEHP and venous sample analysis for free thyroxine (FT4), free tri-iodothyronine (FT3), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) and leptin. Statistical analysis was done in SPSS. Results: Half of subjects were exposed to phthalates. MEP induced an increase in FT4 in obese participants and had no influence on FT3. TSH was increased in obese MEP positive female subjects. MEHP induced a decrease in FT4 in lean participants and a decrease of FT3 in lean males. There was no correlation between MEHP and TSH. Influence of MEP/MEHP on leptin secretion. A tendency for negative correlation between leptin and FT4 was seen. There was no influence of leptin on FT3 and TSH. Conclusion: Our population is greatly exposed to phthalates. MEP and MEHP influence certain thyroid indicators i.e. cause thyroid disruption. Phthalates do not influence leptin secretion in our study. There is a mild effect of leptin on FT4.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.0707 seconds