No description available.

Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2003. / Dateiformat: zip, Dateien im PDF-Format. Text englisch.

Berlin, Freie University, Diss., 2003. / Dateiformat: zip, Dateien im PDF-Format.

Thesis (doctoral)--Kiel, 1983.

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) is a serine protease, which executes its proteolytic activity by cleaving X-Pro dipeptides from the N-termini of its substrates. Furthermore, DPP-IV exhibits many biological functions independent of its enzymatic aktivity. Previous studies in our laboratory proved increased expression of DPP-IV in high-grade astrocytic tumours. To evaluate the enzymatic and non-enzymatic functions of DPP-IV in a glioma model, clones of asctrocytic cell line U373MG transfected by enzymatically inactive, mutated DPP-IV (mutDPP-IV) and enzymatically active, wild type DPP-IV (wtDPP-IV), were prepared. Enzymatically inactive mutDPP-IV was prepared using point mutation the active site serine residue. Cells U373MG were transfected using a doxycycline inducible Tet-On® system. For further analysis of the transgenic forms of DPP-IV, methods were used for verification of protein expression, enzymatic activity and subcellular localization. Doxycycline induced U373MG mutDPP-IV and U373MG wtDPP-IV cells, expressing mutated and wild type DPP-IV, respectivelly, exhibited increased expression of transgenic DPP-IV in a concentration and time dependent manner. Doxycycline induced U373MG wtDPP-IV cells exhibited both increased expression and enzymatic activity of DPP-IV. In contrast, DPP-IV enzymatic...

Mit der vorliegenden Habilitationsschrift habe ich den Versuch unternommen, die beiden Themenkomplexe meiner bisherigen wissenschaftlichen Tätigkeit als Beispiele für die Rolle von Modellen in der klinischen Forschung zu verwenden. Den Ansto§ dazu gaben Diskrepanzen, die mir in der Auseinandersetzung mit eigenen Ergebnissen und Beobachtungen im Umfeld dieser Themenkomplexe aufgefallen sind: der Rolle kontaminierender Tumorzellen in der Hochdosistherapie maligner Tumoren einerseits und dem Enzym Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPP IV) andererseits. Die beobachteten Diskrepanzen sind Ausdruck konkurrierender pathophysiologischer oder therapeutischer Modelle, und die Präferenz eines bestimmten Modells scheint nicht rein rational erklärbar. Welche Faktoren tragen jedoch zur Entscheidung für oder gegen ein bestimmtes Modell bei? Ich möchte den Umgang mit wissenschaftlichen Modellen anhand der genannten Themenkomplexe aus meiner Sicht erörtern. Anschlie§end soll ein Entwurf skizziert werden, in dem die der Entscheidung für oder gegen ein therapeutisches Modell zugrundeliegende Motivationslage besser verständlich wird und die Intentionalität klinischer Forschung auf den Patienten hin berücksichtigt. / In the thesis presented here, I have taken the challenge to use the topics of my scientific work to discuss the role that models appear to exert in clinical science. This decision arose from discrepancies that became evident in the comparative assessment of my own studies in relation with the surrounding scientific context: the role of tumor cells contaminating peripheral blood or progenitor cell harvests as part of a high-dose chemotherapy regimen on the one hand, and the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP IV) on the other. The observed discrepancies appear to result from competing pathophysiological or therapeutic models, and the preference or rejection of one model apparently cannot be explained solely by rational factors. I will discuss the application of models in the context of the topics which my scientific work has been focusing on, and I will develop a draft proposal which will render the individual motivational status underlying the decision in favor of or against a distinct model easier to understand, with attention to the intentionality of clinical research towards the patient.