Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-28T20:13:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2008 - Giuseppa Maria Daniel Spenillo.pdf: 1620863 bytes, checksum: 178ac481d27ca04b2af80abf88e78378 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008-04-17 / This work considers the recent social mobilization to promote the notion of communication as a human right by entities and activists as confrontation to the intergovernmental proposal that approaches contemporary phenomena linked to the uses of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in a global process called World Summit on Information Society (CMSI), approved by ONU in 2001 and carried through two stages, in 2003 and 2005. The necessity to raise the level of communication up to the international and central platforms of debate on which society we want , established on an expectation of change summarized in the expressions another world is possible and another communication is possible has been growing since 2001, in the establishment of World Social Forums. This movement leads entities and activists to articulation CRIS gatherings - Communication Rights on the Information Society, that is perceived as a great world campaign for the right to communication. In Brazil an articulation CRIS was formed in 2003. The social history of the mobilization processes with the purpose of communication changes in Brazil is investigated according to a configurational approach and a sociogenesis perspective (Norbert Elias). There is a dual focus: a) the social relations which are established searching the dynamics for change and the political struggle for the right to communication and b) the habitus that support collective and individual actions, strengthen positions, and freeze certain social dynamics (such as the ones crystallized in laws), while being renewed in the social dynamics (as the search for other forms of political fight), which form social configurations. By studying the fight for the right to communication, needs and expectations have been found, imminently human issues that, for Elias, generate the rhythm and directions of social change. The issues dealt with above underlie our perception that rights, although resulting from political struggles and social power redistribution, meet an ideal of equality as derived from an individualistic conception of society. Therefore, the understanding of Human Right, does not account for less visible social inequalities such as those related to communication and information due to the individualistic framework upholding it. / Tratamos neste trabalho da mobiliza??o social recente para formula??o da no??o de comunica??o como um direito humano, promovida por entidades e ativistas como enfrentamento da proposta inter-governamental de abordar fen?menos contempor?neos ligados aos usos de tecnologias de informa??o e comunica??o (TICs) num processo global denominado C?pula Mundial sobre a Sociedade da Informa??o (CMSI), aprovada na ONU em 2001 e realizada em duas etapas, em 2003 e 2005. A necessidade de elevar a comunica??o ao patamar do debate internacional e central sobre qual sociedade queremos , fundada numa expectativa de mudan?a sintetizada nas express?es um outro mundo ? poss?vel e uma outra comunica??o ? poss?vel vem tomando f?lego desde 2001, nos processos de constru??o dos F?runs Sociais Mundiais. Esse movimento leva ? reuni?o de entidades e ativistas na articula??o CRIS Communication Rights on the Information Society. No Brasil ? formada uma articula??o CRIS a partir de 2003. ? a hist?ria social desses processos de mobiliza??o em fun??o de mudan?as na comunica??o, no Brasil, que investigamos a partir de uma abordagem configuracional e na perspectiva da sociog?nese (Norbert Elias). Para tal, entrevistamos entre 2006 e 2007, participantes da articula??o CRIS Brasil e, ainda, da mobiliza??o por mudan?as na comunica??o no Brasil, e acompanhamos, no per?odo, eventos sobre comunica??o e informa??o. No estudo da luta pelo direito ? comunica??o descobrimos necessidades e expectativas, quest?es iminentemente humanas que, para Elias, produzem os ritmos e as dire??es da mudan?a social. Estas quest?es fundamentam nossa tese de que direitos, embora resultem de lutas sociais e sejam redistribui??es de poder nas estruturas sociais, atendem a um ideal de igualdade proveniente da concep??o individualista de sociedade. A compreens?o de Direito Humano, portanto, n?o d? conta de desigualdades sociais menos vis?veis como as de comunica??o e informa??o pelo pr?prio arcabou?o individualista que a sustenta.