Spelling suggestions: "subject:"disabled""
1 |
Characteristics of serious and fatal motorcycle accidents and the potential for injury preventionPedder, Jocelyn B. January 1992 (has links)
No description available.
|
2 |
Spasticity after first-ever strokeLundström, Erik January 2009 (has links)
The prevalence of spasticity after first-ever stroke is approximately 20%, but there are no data on the prevalence of disabling spasticity.The reported prevalence of pain after stroke varies between 19% and 74%, whether pain is associated with spasticity is not known. Until now, there is no health economic analysis of patients with spasticity after stroke. Methods: Two groups of patients were studied. Cohort I was a cross-sectional survey. A representative sample of 140 patients was investigated 1 year after their first-ever stroke. Spasticity was defined as ≥ 1 score on the modified Ashworth scale, disabling spasticity was defined as spasticity having such an impact that intervention, e.g. intensive physiotherapy, orthoses or pharmacological treatment, should be offered. Pain was assesed with the Visual Analogue Scale. All direct costs during one year were identified and converted into Purchasing Power Parities US dollar (PPP$). Cohort II was a prospective cohort study. Forty-nine patients were examined at day 2–10, at one month, and at six months after their first-ever stroke. Assessment and definitions were similar as for cohort I. Results: Spasticity occurs within 1 month and disabling spasticity occur within 6 months. After one year, the prevalence of spasticity was 17% and that of disabling spasticity 4%. Disabling spasticity was more frequent in the upper extremity. There was an independent effect of severe upper extremity paresis (OR 22, CI 3.9–125) and age below 65 years (OR 9.5, CI 1.5–60). The prevalence of stroke-related pain was 21% after one year. Stroke-related pain was associated with paresis (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2–7.7), sensory disturbance (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.9) and depression (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.4–13), but not with spasticity as an independent variable. The majority of the direct costs for one year (78%) were associated with hospitalization, whereas 20% was associated with municipality services. Only 1% of all direct costs were related to primary health care and 1% to medication. The mean (median, inter-quartile range) direct cost for stroke patients with spasticity was PPP$ 84 195 (72 116, 53 707) compared to PPP$ 21 842 (12 385, 17 484) for stroke patients without spasticity (P < 0.001).
|
3 |
Mediální stereotypizace a nálepkování zdravotně postižených v českých médiích a jejich dopad na publikum / Media stereotypization and labeling of people with a disability in Czech media and its impact on the audienceBrhláčová, Monika January 2016 (has links)
1 Error! Unknown document property name. Abstract The presented master thesis deals with the topic of stereotypical presentations of disabled people in Czech newspapers and with its impact on the audience. This topic build on previous findings regarding repetitive stereotypical images and frames of disabled which were not only studied on newspapers. Simultaneously with those reoccurring frames and images we can also find positive of negative labels which are used in connection with disabled in newspapers. The work examines whether these phenomena occur also in Czech online and printed news. Using qualitative content analysis phenomena mentioned above were searched in randomly selected one hundred news. Requirement for choosing articles to selection was that the articles content need to be whole about handicapped people. Precisely, based on previous literature the text were analyzed and it was searched for narrative frames or models, stereotypical frames and labels that could be presented in texts. The purpose of this analysis was not only to demonstrate that those frames or labels are present in Czech newspaper articles but also make an attempt to fins new stereotypical frames or labels that those texts may contain. The second part of the analysis is to verify whether the public perceives these...
|
4 |
Dlouhodobý hmotný a nehmotný majetek z pohledu české legislativy a IFRS / Tangible and intangible investment goods based on czech legislature and IFRSSkuhravá, Tereza January 2009 (has links)
Tangible and intangible investment goods, its determination, disposition, evaluation, technical improvements, depreciation, disabling, comparing czech legislature and IAS/IFRS
|
Page generated in 0.0693 seconds